Exhibiting Amphibians

Chapter 20


Exhibiting Amphibians



Many people underestimate the difficulties in creating successful amphibian exhibits, assuming it is merely a matter of understanding amphibian husbandry. However, exhibiting anything is more challenging than maintaining it off-display, and this is especially true of amphibians. Many species are delicate and shy, and balancing their needs with the needs of the visiting public is both an art and a science. There are at least four major challenges to overcome: keeping the animals visible; keeping the animals comfortable; buffering the internal environment against rapid changes, and making the exhibit easy for keepers to maintain. Failing to meet any of these challenges can be a recipe for disaster.


Good exhibit design is largely a matter of predicting the behaviors and needs of the animals, the visiting public, and the exhibit keepers. One must approach it with a realistic mindset. Hoping that visitors will take time to search for hidden amphibians is naïve. Assuming that keepers will consistently attend to every husbandry detail is dangerous. Successful exhibit designs anticipate likely problems and mitigate human errors. They usually include a good deal of hidden infrastructure and a great deal of hidden planning.


In 2001, Peeling Productions, the exhibit arm of Clyde Peeling’s Reptiland, a zoologic park in Allenwood, Pennsylvania accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), began planning a large-scale traveling exhibition called Frogs—A Chorus of Colors. Having exhibited amphibians on a small scale at our permanent facility in Pennsylvania, we knew that a big, complex project would require forethought. We began by visiting public and private amphibian facilities to learn from the experiences of others. Our goal was to emulate the successful aspects of existing exhibits and improve on their weaknesses. Over the next 2 years our exhibit team designed, prototyped, and fabricated the exhibition at our production facility in Pennsylvania, learning along the way. The finished exhibition premiered in 2003 and has been on a nationwide tour of museums, zoos, and science centers ever since (Figure 20-1). Building Frogs—A Chorus of Colors affected the trajectory and interests of our company. We created a second copy of the exhibition in 2005 and have since built a series of custom amphibian exhibits for other clients. Each of these projects has left us with strong opinions about what works and what does not. While this chapter is primarily about creating public exhibits, the principles can be applied to amphibian displays of any kind.




What to Avoid


The most common mistake in public amphibian exhibits is over planting. It is tempting to create a beautiful, lush habitat that closely mimics an animal’s native environment and call it an exhibit, but planting with abandon ensures that the subjects of the exhibit—the amphibians—will rarely be seen. Nothing frustrates visitors more than an animal exhibit without animals, even if it is a stunning botanical display. Of course, the solution to overplanting is not to eliminate the plants; there is no reason to sacrifice aesthetics or naturalism. However, planting, arranging props, and all other aspects of decorating an exhibit must be done strategically to keep the animals in view (Figure 20-2).



Another common misstep is selecting species that interest keepers or curators but do not exhibit well. The most obvious example of this is the iconic Red-eyed tree frog (Agalychnis callidryas). While stunningly beautiful when active, these frogs are strictly nocturnal. They perch on glass or under leaves by day with their eyes closed and all of their colorful parts tucked beneath their green bodies. From a visitor’s perspective they look like small green blobs stuck to various surfaces. Although it is possible to exhibit Red-eyed Tree frogs under reversed lighting conditions, their splendid colors cannot be appreciated in dim or blue light. This is not to suggest that exhibitors avoid experimenting with difficult species but only that some species lend themselves to exhibits far more than others. Amphibians are charming animals, and people are captivated by the chance to see one up close. Displaying dormant or hidden specimens wastes an opportunity to captivate an audience. Save the ultra-shy species for backroom collections and stick with those that are engaging to watch.


The third mistake common to many amphibian exhibits is a labor-intensive design. It is easy to make an exhibit look pretty for opening day, but keeping it beautiful over the long term depends on functionality. Many exhibit designers are out of touch with the needs of keepers and the realities of daily maintenance. Exhibits with limited access, inadequate filtration, or minimal automation are difficult to care for and usually suffer neglect over time. Ease of maintenance should be a design imperative on par with aesthetics, durability, and cost.



One Approach to Exhibit Design



Species Selection


The natural starting point for designing an amphibian exhibit is species selection, and the range of possible species is often dictated by the overarching message or theme of the project. Whatever the theme is, choosing a species that will engage visitors should be a priority. Otherwise, why bother with an exhibit? Defining the qualities of a good exhibit species is subjective, but a few basic questions are worth asking. Is the species nocturnal or diurnal? Does it perch in the open or prefer to stay hidden? Is it colorful or unusual enough to catch a layperson’s eye? Is there an interesting or important story to tell? How large is it? Can multiple specimens be kept together? Has anyone else exhibited it successfully?


Practical concerns should also temper species choices. Some of the most spectacular amphibians, like West African Goliath Frogs (Conraua goliath), are unavailable or very difficult to maintain. Weigh the skill of exhibit keepers against committing to fragile species or those with unknown husbandry requirements. Consider whether the species is available now and likely to be available in the foreseeable future. Is it being bred in captivity or is it only available through importation? Does it have unusual or costly dietary requirements? Are specimens expensive to replace?


One of the hidden costs of exhibiting amphibians is maintaining a backup colony. Most species are sensitive to subtle environmental changes and can decline quickly if something goes wrong. In addition, the potential for introduced epidemic diseases like chytridiomycosis and ranavirus can quickly ravage a colony or an entire collection. Sooner or later, some specimens will probably need to be removed from exhibit because of illness, social stress, or death. It can be difficult to find replacements in a pinch because many species are only available seasonally. Furthermore, adult specimens of many species come at a premium, if breeders are willing to give them up at all. The obvious solution is to raise backups. Exhibiting amphibians requires allocating space, staff, and budget to continually maintain at least as many animals off display as needed on exhibit. We maintain 400 amphibian specimens off exhibit at Reptiland to support approximately 200 display animals in our various exhibitions (Figure 20-3). Of course, quarantine of newly acquired specimens takes even more space and time.





Enclosures


The outer structure, or tank, that contains an amphibian exhibit may be invisible to the viewing public, but everything inside the exhibit depends on it. The tank must be waterproof and durable and sturdy enough to support the weight of the internal components. Off-the-shelf glass aquaria are the least expensive option, but they are fragile, heavy, difficult to modify, and often the wrong shapes and sizes for functional amphibian exhibits. Custom-built tanks allow the exhibit to be designed around the animals, keepers, and visitors. A variety of materials are commonly used in constructing exhibit tanks including glass, epoxy-covered wood, acrylic, polyethylene, polypropylene, and fiberglass-reinforced plastics (FRP).


Each of these materials has its place, and choosing one depends on the overall scope of the project. In general, glass is the most desirable viewing surface because acrylic and similar transparent plastics scratch and warp over time. However, glass is too heavy and fragile for use in the overall structure. Plywood is probably the most versatile material for hidden structures, but it takes skill and care to properly envelop the wood in a reliable epoxy coating. Plastic shops can quickly fabricate acrylic tanks in nearly any shape and size, and they are relatively lightweight. Acrylic is fragile: the surface scratches under normal wear, and stress cracks often form where fasteners penetrate it. Polypropylene and polyethylene are available in sheets (typically opaque white) that can be heat-welded into watertight containers with specialized equipment. These plastics are rugged and easy to machine, but they are relatively costly and do not accept adhesives well (i.e., to bond glass or interior décor). FRP is available in sheet form, or it can be built up by hand by laying resin-impregnated fiberglass sheets over a removable form. FRP is incredibly strong, lightweight, and versatile, but the resins are toxic when uncured and require a good deal of safety equipment and skill to use.


Exhibit enclosures should be proportional in shape and size to the species and number of specimens they will house. Bigger is not always better. Most amphibians are secretive and will stay in the farthest corners of an enclosure if given the option. It is usually better to provide adequate living space and security with complex interior terrain rather than a large footprint. In general, limit the depth of enclosures to keep animals relatively close to viewing surfaces, creating cover with gentle cutbacks and careful plantings. Of course, the raw enclosure must be large enough to accommodate the interior décor while still leaving enough room for the animals.


One of the most important considerations in enclosure design is keeper access. It is tempting to think that tall enclosures can be serviced from above or that keepers can reach through small openings to provide care. The reality is that tanks that are difficult to enter will not be cared for as well as those that have easy access. Make doors large enough to allow an adult person to lean inside and locate doors so that shorter people can reach all corners of the enclosure. Consider how difficult it will be to reach around branches and other obstructions to clean glass or tend plants. If possible, include front access to enclosures, so keepers can see the exhibit from a visitor’s perspective while cleaning—working in reverse is far more difficult (Figure 20-4). All doors should be designed to avoid accidentally squashing an amphibian when closing, and perimeter gaps should be small enough to limit insect escapes.



Do not skimp on hardware associated with the exhibit. Anything metallic (i.e. hinges, latches, or wire screens) should be aluminum or stainless steel. Moisture quickly leads to corrosion of ferric metals, even plated or galvanized versions, and the initial cost savings is offset over time by the need for replacements. Metallic structures directly exposed to tank water should be high-grade stainless steel. Other noncorrosive metals (e.g., brass, copper, and bronze) may leach into water and become toxic to amphibians.



Interior Landscapes


Interior decor puts exhibit animals in context and provides a visual backdrop. Its complexity depends on the project’s scope and budget. Low cost scenes can be constructed with the use of real rocks, substrates, and branches. Completely “naturalistic” scenes, cast in concrete or resins, are much more costly but provide the illusion of a “slice of nature” (Figure 20-5). Well-designed fabricated interiors are also lower maintenance and can include hidden infrastructure such as contained planting pockets, plumbing, and conduit for electric cables.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 3, 2016 | Posted by in SUGERY, ORTHOPEDICS & ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Exhibiting Amphibians

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access