Endoscopic Instrumentation and Documentation for Flexible and Rigid Endoscopy

Chapter 1 Endoscopic Instrumentation and Documentation for Flexible and Rigid Endoscopy



Most endoscopic instrumentation is produced for human medicine and surgery. There are literally thousands of products designed for every possible application of endoscopy in people. From this overwhelming array of sometimes cost-prohibitive choices, the savvy veterinary practitioner must carefully select the most versatile products that provide an efficacious solution to the medical and surgical challenges best addressed by a minimally invasive approach. This chapter presents a general and practical overview of the most popular flexible and rigid instrumentation—its proper care, economic implications, and common applications in veterinary medicine.




Flexible Endoscopes


The two basic types of flexible endoscopes are the fiberscope and the video endoscope. The difference between the two is in the method of sensing and transmitting images. In a fiberoptic endoscope, the image is carried from the distal tip of the endoscope to the eyepiece via bundles of optical glass fibers. In a true video endoscope, the image is transmitted electronically to a video monitor from the distal tip of the endoscope where it is “sensed” by a charge-coupled device (CCD) chip.


Video imaging offers distinct advantages in terms of operator comfort, client relations, teaching, and documentation. Video imaging also enables the endoscopist to work more effectively with any assistants who are helping with the procedure. For these reasons, it is advised that all practices performing endoscopy have at least some type of video imaging capability, as will be described later on.


The ability to view the endoscopic image on a video monitor and record or print this information is not unique to video endoscopes. Indirect video endoscopy can be accomplished by attaching an endoscopic CCD video camera to the eyepiece of a fiberscope or rigid endoscope (see “Endoscopic Imaging Systems” later in this chapter, Figure 1-25). Although true video endoscopes are preferred for superior visualization in gastrointestinal endoscopy, CCD video cameras are still necessary for use with rigid endoscopes (e.g., laparoscopes and arthroscopes), as well as smaller diameter fiberscopes. Fortunately, the combination of a good quality video camera and fiberoptic endoscope can provide very good images. The smallest flexible video endoscopes currently available for medical use are approximately 5 or 6 mm in outer diameter, depending on chip technology and mechanical functions, such as channel size and deflection capability. Until the technologic limitations on the miniaturization of CCD chips are overcome, the production of very small diameter video endoscopes is not feasible.


Although fiberscopes are less expensive than video endoscopes, the cost of the latter has recently come down and the image quality of video endoscopes is far superior to that of fiberscopes (Figure 1-3). Because the image produced by a video endoscope is not fiberoptic, it will never contain the honeycomb pattern or broken fibers seen as black dots in a fiberoptic image. The features of fiberscopes and video endoscopes are compared in Table 1-1.



Table 1-1 Features of Fiberscopes versus Video Endoscopes



























Feature Fiberscope Video endoscope
Image quality Good Excellent
Broken fibers seen as “black dots” Likely over time N/A (image is electronic, not fiberoptic)
Cost Moderate High
Diameters available Wide range available Smaller diameters not available
Video capability Requires attachable charge coupled device (CCD) camera Integral

Due to limitations on chip miniaturization.


Flexible endoscopes are available in diameters ranging from 14 mm to less than 1 mm. Most flexible scopes greater than 2 mm in diameter are equipped with an accessory channel and a deflectable tip. The working channel is the section of the endoscope through which ancillary instruments like biopsy forceps (Figure 1-4) are advanced into the patient. Because of their versatility, the most popular endoscopes in small animal practice are gastroscopes, which have four-way tip deflection. The tip’s two-plane deflection capability (i.e., up, down, left, and right) is crucial to the successful navigation of the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in the most challenging maneuvers through the pylorus and ileocolic orifice. A gastroscope less than 9 mm in diameter and at least 130 cm in length is suitable for both upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in most cats and dogs, as well as tracheobronchoscopy in medium and large size dogs.



Because most gastroscopes have an outer diameter of 7.8 mm or greater, they cannot be used in smaller dogs and cats for such procedures as bronchoscopy, rhinoscopy, and urethrocystoscopy. Consequently, the second and third most popular flexible endoscopes in small animal practice are small-diameter fiberscopes that are used primarily for endoscopy of the airways and urinary tract (Figure 1-5). These smaller diameter fiberscopes, ranging from 2 mm to 6 mm, generally have limited tip deflection capability (one-way or two-way) and smaller working channels.




Basic Construction and Handling


A flexible endoscope has three major sections (Figure 1-6): the insertion tube, the handpiece, and the umbilical cord. Construction of the insertion tube is the most complex and technically challenging aspect of gastroscope design because this portion of the instrument contains fiberoptic bundles; channels for suction, irrigation, and insufflation; four deflection cables; and several layers of protective materials along the entire length of the tube. All of these components must be contained within an insertion tube that has the smallest possible diameter, largest possible accessory channel, and maximal tip deflection capabilities. Because of the complexity of construction and the fragile nature of some components, damage to the insertion tube is the most expensive type of repair performed on gastroscopes. Most insertion tube damage can be prevented by observing the following:






If these rules are consistently followed, the life span of an endoscope can be significantly prolonged and repairs can be minimized.


The last several centimeters of an endoscope with tip deflection capability is called the bending section. Controlled by the deflection knob(s) in the handpiece, this portion of the insertion tube may be deflected in one or two planes. Deflection in a single plane (one-way or two-way angulation) is common in small-diameter endoscopes used for procedures such as bronchoscopy and urethroscopy. However, endoscopes designed for gastrointestinal use (gastroscopes) are equipped with four-way angulation (i.e., up, down, left, and right), which allows the endoscopist to deflect the tip in any direction by coordinating the simultaneous movement of the up/down and left/right control knobs. Two-plane deflection capability is essential for a thorough endoscopic examination of the gastrointestinal tract. The degree of tip deflection varies among models, but complete retroflexion (180 degrees or greater) in at least one direction is desirable.


A close-up inspection of the distal tip of an insertion tube shows the cross-sectional location of several of the internal structures (Figure 1-6, see “Distal Tip” box). The insufflation channel allows room air to be blown into the gastrointestinal tract, distending the viscus and enabling clearer and more thorough examination of the mucosa. The water jet exiting the irrigation nozzle is directed over the distal objective lens to remove debris and mucus when necessary. The accessory channel is used for suction of air and fluids, as well as the passage of flexible instruments into the patient (see Figure 1-4). Because of this fact, the effectiveness of suction is greatly reduced when an instrument is inside the channel.



The handpiece contains the air/water and suction valves; deflection control knobs and locks; the opening to the accessory channel; and, in some models, programmable buttons that control various functions such as light gain and image freeze. The handpiece of a fiberscope also contains the eyepiece with its diopter adjustment ring, for direct viewing without video. The handpiece is designed to be held in the left hand (see Figure 1-6, B). The index finger controls suction by fully depressing the first valve. The air/water valve can be controlled by the index or middle finger. Insufflation is activated when the fingertip is placed on the hole in the top of the valve without depressing it, and irrigation is activated when the valve is fully depressed. The thumb of the left hand is used to control the up/down deflection knob, which is the larger, inner knob. The right hand controls the left/right deflection knob (smaller, outer knob), inserts channel accessories, and advances the insertion tube into the patient, applying rotational torque when necessary. Excessive torque should not be applied to the insertion tube, and care should be taken to ensure that deflection locks are in the unlocked position before deflection knobs are used. The deflection locks are the two levers that lock each of the deflection knobs in position. Theoretically, they could be used to lock the deflected tip in a desired position during a procedure; however, in practice they are rarely used, and it is generally recommended that they be left in the unlocked position. (More information on the handling and maneuvering of gastrointestinal endoscopes is provided in Chapter 2.)


The umbilical cord contains the portion of the fiberscope that connects to the light source, including connectors for insufflation and irrigation in gastroscopes. Although the umbilical cord is not as fragile as the insertion tube, it still contains light-carrying fiber bundles and therefore should be handled with caution. Light sources for gastrointestinal fiberscopes may contain an integral air pump that provides air for insufflation. The same air pump provides the positive pressure that forces water from an attached bottle through the irrigation channel when the irrigation button on the handpiece is depressed. A separate connector for suction allows a tube to be attached to an independent suction pump. A pressure compensation valve in this region prevents damage from external pressure changes that may occur during ethylene oxide (ETO) gas sterilization or shipping by air when the pressure compensation cap is attached to the valve. A manometer-type pressure tester attached to this valve is used to check for internal leaks in the endoscope. When the pressure tester is attached (Figure 1-8), the bulb is repeatedly squeezed until the desired pressure is reached according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The needle of the pressure gauge should remain stable if the system is free of leaks. Pressure testing is quick and easy and should be done as a matter of routine before and after each procedure. Early detection of leaks may prevent costly water damage to the internal components of a fiberscope.




Fiberscope Optics


The image- and light-transmitting components of a fiberscope consist of bundles of optical fibers. Each fiber, typically 8 to 12 μm in diameter, has a core of optical-quality glass. This core is surrounded by glass cladding that must have a lower refractive index than the core. The differential in refractive indices results in a state of nearly total internal reflection, which allows the fiber to transmit light with only negligible losses.


Because each fiber is only capable of transmitting a spot of uniform color and brightness, several thousand fibers must be arranged in a coherent order to transmit an image. Coherent bundles are formed by fusing the individual fiber faces of each end of the bundle in exactly the same pattern (Figure 1-9, A). The resolution and size of a fiberoptic image are determined in part by the number and size of individual fibers. Naturally, the possible size of an image bundle is limited in smaller diameter fiberscopes; consequently, the image size is reduced in these models. The optical benefits of reducing individual fiber diameter are also limited. With a reduction in fiber diameter, the ratio of cladding to core glass increases, resulting in reduced light transmission and a prominent honeycomb pattern that is more easily seen by the viewer.



In addition to the image bundle (also called an image guide, IG), a fiberscope typically contains one or two light guide (LG) bundles that transmit light from the light source to the distal tip of the fiberscope to illuminate the area being examined. Although the fibers in the LG bundles may be similar to those in the IG bundles, they are not arranged in any particular pattern because they do not need to transmit an image. These fiber bundles are called incoherent bundles (see Figure 1-9, B).


The lens systems in an endoscope, which are located at each end of the fiber bundles, also contribute significantly to image quality. The objective lenses are at the distal tip and serve to focus the image of the mucosa on the distal face of the IG bundle. The focal point of this lens system determines the depth of field, which is the range of distances over which the image is in focus. Modern fiberscopes commonly have a depth of field from about 3 to 100 mm. The ocular lenses are in the eyepiece of a fiberscope. Their basic purpose is to magnify the image transmitted to the proximal face of the IG bundle so that it can be comfortably seen by the viewer. Several factors contribute to the overall magnification of structures seen through an endoscope, but perhaps the most important one is the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the subject.


Illumination lenses at each end of the LG bundles maximize the amount of light carried to the object being illuminated. The development of higher quality illumination lens systems and improvements in fiberoptic technology have been crucial in providing adequate brightness in the newer endoscopes with smaller diameters and greater fields of view.




Flexible Instruments


A variety of flexible instruments are available for use with endoscopes that have an accessory channel (see Figure 1-4). Both flexible and rigid endoscopes may accommodate the passage of flexible instruments, depending on their design. The most widely used instruments are for biopsy and foreign body retrieval. Biopsy instruments are described in detail in Chapter 8, and foreign body retrieval instruments are described in Chapter 7. Other popular flexible instruments include cytology brushes (Chapter 8), aspiration tubing, injection/aspiration needles, polypectomy snares, and coagulating electrodes. A vast number of styles and sizes are available; user preference and experience generally dictate which models work best.


Most flexible instruments are classified as either “reusable” or “disposable” (i.e., designed for single use). Reusable instruments are more expensive and durable, although veterinarians frequently reuse disposable instruments. Quality does vary, however, and it is advised that instruments be selected carefully for best function and durability rather than allowing cost to guide which instruments are selected. Caution should be used when instrumentation made by a manufacturer other than that of the endoscope itself is selected, as it is not uncommon to damage the working channel of an endoscope with the use of instruments that are not compatible with a particular scope.


To prevent costly damage to the accessory channel of a flexible endoscope, the endoscopist should observe the following general recommendations:







Rigid and Semirigid Endoscopes


Flexible endoscopes are needed to thoroughly examine the depths of tubular structures that turn corners (e.g., intestine, bronchial tree, and male canine urethra), but rigid endoscopes are more convenient for examining nontubular structures, such as the abdominal cavity, thoracic cavity, or joint spaces. Rigid endoscopes, also known as telescopes, are also much simpler in design and less expensive than flexible endoscopes (Figure 1-10). Although they do contain glass lenses and fiberoptics, they do not contain the moving parts, flexible materials, and instrument channel of a flexible endoscope and can therefore easily last for many years with proper care.



The original rigid endoscope was simply a hollow tube through which light was directed into a body cavity. The conventional telescope lens system (Figure 1-11, A) was first developed by Nitze in 1879. The next crucial breakthrough occurred in 1966, when Hopkins invented the rod lens system (Figure 1-11, B), which is still recognized as the gold standard of the industry. By employing complex optical physics algorithms, high-quality optical glass lenses, and robust manufacturing practices, a state-of-the-art rod lens system offers several significant improvements in image quality, including better light transmission, higher resolution and contrast, greater magnification, and a wider field of view. The wide variety of available rigid endoscopes and the visual access provided by even the smallest models open up an enormous field of minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities to veterinary practitioners. Indeed, the use of this technology in veterinary practice has expanded considerably since the mid-1990s.



When trying to determine the optical quality of an endoscope, it is tempting to refer to seemingly objective specification data (i.e., degree of magnification, resolution, and brightness). These specifications may be helpful, but it is much more useful to evaluate and compare complete endoscopy systems in a controlled clinical setting. The reason for this is that the end results important to the operator will vary widely depending on numerous variables such as the anatomy being examined, distance from the subject, light source, video camera, monitor, cables, and many other factors. For example, an endoscope supplier may report that his or her endoscopes magnify structures “up to 20 times,” but this means very little without knowing which endoscope, used at what distance from the subject, and with which camera and what size monitor. Isolated specifications can often be misleading, as they do not take into account the many variables that contribute to the final image seen on a video monitor during clinical endoscopy.


Rigid and semirigid endoscopes have outer diameters ranging from about 1 to 10 mm. Larger scopes have greater light-carrying capacity and produce larger images. Smaller scopes are less invasive and fit into smaller areas (e.g., nasal passages, female urethras, and joints). Some of the more common applications of rigid endoscopy in small animal medicine include laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, urethrocystoscopy, rhinoscopy, laryngoscopy, arthroscopy, vaginoscopy, otoscopy, and avian and exotics endoscopy. As with flexible endoscopes, no one size of rigid or semirigid endoscope is suitable for all procedures in all patients. The appropriate-sized telescope should be selected on the basis of the procedures most commonly performed (Table 1-2). Although smaller telescopes tend to be more versatile, they are also more prone to breakage and illumination is limited when these scopes are used in larger, more light-absorptive cavities (e.g., thorax and abdomen).



The viewing angle of a telescope is an important consideration because it affects both orientation and visual access (Figure 1-12). Forward-viewing telescopes (0 degrees) provide the simplest orientation but a relatively limited viewing field, centered on the axis of the telescope. A 25- or 30-degree viewing angle allows the endoscopist to view a larger area by simply rotating the telescope on its longitudinal axis. Spatial orientation becomes more challenging with an oblique-viewing scope, but as more experience is gained, the operator can become quite proficient in its use. Some telescopes are available in even more acute angles of view (e.g., 70, 90, and 120 degrees), but these instruments are rarely used in veterinary practice. The choice of telescope largely depends on the procedure being performed and the experience of the endoscopist.



Rigid endoscopes are typically used in conjunction with some type of sheath or cannula, which serves several purposes: it provides access to the anatomic site, protects the telescope and patient, and facilitates the ingress or egress of fluids or gas, as well as the introduction of diagnostic or surgical instruments. By convention, a sheath is usually locked onto the telescope, as in the case of an arthroscope sheath (Figure 1-13) or cystoscope sheath. A cannula, on the other hand, usually refers to a tube through which the telescope or instrument passes freely (without locking), as in the case of a laparoscope cannula (Figure 1-14) or arthroscope instrument cannula.




The most popular telescope used today in small animal practice is the 2.7-mm Multi-Purpose Rigid endoscope. Frequently referred to as an arthroscope, this versatile telescope is ideally suited for many other procedures including urethrocystoscopy in females, rhinoscopy, otoscopy, and avian celioscopy. The popular “operating sheath” for this telescope, originally designed for human pediatric cystoscopy, accommodates 5F flexible instruments and allows the introduction of fluids or gas (Figure 1-15). A variety of sheaths and cannulae are available for the Multi-Purpose Rigid endoscope (Figure 1-16), each designed to suit the anatomy and functional requirements of different procedures.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 10, 2016 | Posted by in SMALL ANIMAL | Comments Off on Endoscopic Instrumentation and Documentation for Flexible and Rigid Endoscopy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access