Chemical Restraint of Camelids

Chemical Restraint of Camelids

Camelid patients may, at times, be difficult to work on. The level of patient cooperation may play a significant role in the quality of care that can be provided. Physical restraint is generally required when working with camelid patients. Adding a degree of chemical restraint may make many procedures more pleasant for both practitioner and patient. The enhanced level of patient cooperation improves efficiency, offsetting the modest additional paperwork and cost involved.

This chapter focuses primarily on llama and alpaca patients. To date, the author has not used all of the techniques presented in this chapter on camels. Of the techniques that have been used on camels, the dosing protocols discussed here have proven effective. Patient preparation, positioning, monitoring, and recovery are covered in other chapters in this text.

Chemical restraint techniques used in camelids range from mild sedation of standing patients to semianesthetized recumbency. When selecting a chemical restraint technique, we should first consider whether the patient must remain standing or recumbent for optimal performance of the procedure. Patient cooperation and systemic analgesia are generally greater with techniques that reliably produce recumbency. Instances in which either situation will facilitate successful performance of the procedure allow more latitude with regard to technique and doses.

Many of the drug combinations used to produce field anesthesia in camelids are also used in chemical restraint. Drug doses are typically smaller when used in chemical restraint techniques, but the difference between these two applications is, at times, modest. The level of analgesia produced by chemical restraint varies with the technique and doses administered. Analgesia may approach surgical levels in some situations, but local anesthetic blockade should be used, whenever feasible, to reduce the risk of patient awareness and stress.

Unfortunately, things do not always go as planned. Should chemical restraint prove inadequate for the intended procedure, being prepared to convert to injectable or inhalation maintenance anesthesia increases the likelihood of a successful outcome. An anesthetic bolus of intravenous (IV) ketamine may be sufficient for shorter situations. Infusion of Double Drip or Ruminant Triple Drip provides a more stable plane of anesthesia when an extended duration is required. Butorphanol (0.05–0.1 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg], IV or intramuscular [IM] in llamas and alpacas; 0.02–0.05 mg/kg, IV or IM, in larger camels) or morphine (0.05–0.1 mg/kg, IV or IM) may be administered to augment the level of analgesia of chemical restraint techniques. Onset time for butorphanol and morphine is slow (peak effect is approximately 10 minutes post-IV and 20 minutes post-IM administration). Additional information on these methods is provided in Chapter 46.

Camelids tend to be patient during recovery from recumbent chemical restraint and anesthesia. They typically do not attempt to stand until they are awake and functional. Patient demeanor and the level of sensory stimulation (pain, environmental) influence the quality of recovery. Supplemental xylazine administration is rarely required but may be necessary in exceptionally unruly patients to prevent premature attempts to stand. Preemptive analgesic support should be used in painful procedures.

Ketamine Stun

The Ketamine Stun is basically the addition of a small dose of ketamine to any injectable chemical restraint technique. I initially developed the Ketamine Stun technique in the early 1990s to cover my limited handling abilities with regard to cats. My first exposure to camelid patients occurred when I left equine practice to teach at Ohio State. Their frequent recalcitrant behavior quickly led to experimentation with low-dose ketamine protocols to improve the level of patient cooperation during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Success was immediately evident, and the technique became wildly popular with the food animal clinicians, residents, and students charged with the care of these patients.1 Because of the success in camelid patients, the Ketamine Stun technique was adjusted for use in ruminants (lower dose of xylazine) and proved to be just as useful.2 Equine applications have proven more challenging. Dramatic improvement in cooperation evident a minute or two after an IV bolus of ketamine is administered to patients that were totally uncooperative under the prior detomidine–morphine sedation suggests the potential of the Ketamine Stun technique in horses.3,4 Unfortunately, the effective chemical restraint levels of ketamine are not far removed from those that produce instability in horses. The Ketamine Stun technique has been shown to reduce stress response to castration and dehorning in calves.5,6

The term Ketamine Stun (or “Ket Stun”) was derived from the stunned effect the technique produced in patients when administered at doses that produce recumbency. These patients appear to be awake but seem oblivious to their surroundings and the procedure being performed. The IV effect is quite brief (approximately15 minutes), and patients typically stand and appear fairly normal at that time. I initially referred to this state as semianesthetized, but perhaps chemical hypnosis is a more appropriate description.

α2-adrenergic agonists possess potent sedative and analgesic effects. Opioids are typically thought of as analgesic drugs, but they possess central nervous system (CNS) effects, which, when combined with a tranquilizer or sedative, produce a greater level of mental depression. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that possesses potent analgesic effects at subanesthetic doses.7 Ketamine was initially included in the stun technique for its analgesic properties but likely contributes to the mental aspects of the enhanced cooperation exhibited by patients under the influence of the Ketamine Stun technique. By combining drugs, smaller doses of the individual components can be used while still achieving the desired level of patient control. Dosing must be more conservative when using the ketamine stun technique in standing patients. This limits the degree of systemic analgesia relative to what can be achieved in recumbent patients but still provides improved patient cooperation when compared with more traditional methods of standing chemical restraint in both ruminants and horses.

In ruminants and camelid patients, I use a combination of xylazine, butorphanol, and ketamine. In equine patients, I use detomidine, morphine, and ketamine. Morphine is used to provide analgesic relief in food animal patients and is much less expensive than butorphanol. I have used morphine (0.05–0.06 mg/kg) in ruminant stuns. In standing adult cattle stuns, a similar level of cooperation is achieved with either opioid, but patients appear less obtunded when morphine is used. Some practitioners may find the obtunded appearance useful because it allows them to monitor decay over time in the level of chemical restraint. Deterioration in the level of patient cooperation also may be used to determine when supplemental drug administration would be required. The systemic analgesia provided by the Ketamine Stun technique is not limited to purely chemical restraint applications. Small doses of ketamine (0.22 mg/kg, IV) layered over a mild level of xylazine sedation provide dramatic short-term (15 minutes) relief from moderate colic pain in horses.8

Ketamine Stun techniques can be divided into two broad categories: (1) standing and (2) recumbent techniques. The standing Ketamine Stun is used primarily in large ruminants and horses. The recumbent Ketamine Stun is used primarily in small ruminants, camelids, and foals. The level of effect achieved is determined by three variables: (1) dose, (2) route of administration, and (3) initial demeanor of the patient. The stun cocktail may be administered by the IV, IM, or subcutaneous (SQ) route, depending on the systemic analgesia, patient cooperation, and duration desired (Box 45-1).

Aggressive dosing increases not only the level of systemic analgesia and patient cooperation but also the risk of instability, unintended recumbency, or the duration of intended recumbency. In patients that must remain standing, balance between the α2-adrenergic agonist and ketamine is crucial. Greater levels of sedation require lower peak blood levels of ketamine to avoid producing a transient period of instability in equine patients and recumbency in ruminant and camelid patients. Obtaining maximum benefit from the Ketamine Stun technique requires pushing up against the limits of this balancing act. The rapid rise in blood levels produced by IV administration of ketamine presents the greatest challenge. Titrated administration of IV ketamine may be used to minimize risk of untoward responses.

An endless number of permutations are possible when using the Ketamine Stun technique. Many years of experimentation in many different species have provided a great deal of insight into the potential of this technique but have not produced a definitive combination for all situations in each species. The dosage protocols for the Ketamine Stun techniques are deliberately conservative. Results obtained over several years in camelid patients with “mid-range” behavior were used to develop the recommendations to ensure that the most sensitive individuals are not overly affected. IV administration has been used more extensively, so IM dosage recommendations are not as highly refined. I generally use the upper end of the recommended dosage ranges in most normal, healthy patients. Extremely anxious or unruly individuals may require somewhat more aggressive dosing or supplemental administration to achieve the desired effect. I find the lower end of the recommended dosage ranges useful for quick or less invasive procedures. The xylazine component of the Ketamine Stun technique is smaller than the xylazine doses used to produce recumbent sedation in camelid patients, but it is large enough to pose a risk in severely compromised patients; the dosage should therefore be reduced accordingly when using the IV Ketamine Stun technique in these patients. The following examples are provided as a guide, and practitioners are encouraged to experiment with adjustments in doses.

Intravenous Ketamine Stun

The camelid IV Ketamine Stun technique is designed to provide a potent but brief level of chemical restraint. It was designed for short procedures requiring a high level of patient cooperation, systemic analgesia, or both. The enhanced degree of patient cooperation provided by the IV Ketamine Stun technique improves the quality of patient care that can be provided, which has made it very popular with practitioners who have tried it. The thick skin and fiber of the camelid neck may make jugular venipuncture somewhat challenging. The veins on the external surface of ears of some camelids are relatively large and accessible, providing a useful alternative site for IV administration. Most camelid patients require only modest head restraint when a 25-gauge needle and good technique are used. Percutaneous injections via the ear vein should be limited to small volumes.

A combination of xylazine, ketamine, and butorphanol is administered intravenously (Table 45-1). A graceful transition to recumbency occurs approximately 1 minute after IV administration of the Ketamine Stun combination. Patients continue to appear surprisingly “alert” but are typically oblivious to their surroundings and the procedures being performed. Systemic analgesia peaks 1 to 2 minutes after the IV Ketamine Stun administration and diminishes over time. The initial level of systemic analgesia is typically fairly profound. Patients typically are ready to stand and walk with minimal residual effect evident approximately 15 minutes after IV administration of the Ketamine Stun. The clinician should plan ahead and work fast when using the IV Ketamine Stun.

Mar 27, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Chemical Restraint of Camelids
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes