Feline Cardiac Arrhythmias

Chapter 173


Feline Cardiac Arrhythmias



Like other species, cats may have cardiac arrhythmias that range in importance from harmless variations to life-threatening disorders. The decision-making process that determines the degree of concern and intervention warranted for a cat’s arrhythmia—triage—should focus on at least five factors: (1) type of arrhythmia; (2) presence, type, and severity of structural heart disease; (3) reversible contributing factors; (4) presence or absence of syncope; and (5) heart rate during the arrhythmia.


The type of arrhythmia can be known only by analysis of an electrocardiogram (ECG), which may be obtained via standard ECG in the hospital or, for intermittent arrhythmias, via ambulatory ECG (Holter or event monitoring).


The presence or absence of structural heart disease is not suspected reliably from physical examination findings alone: depending on the criteria used, as few as 18% of cats with heart murmurs have evidence of left ventricular concentric hypertrophy on an echocardiogram (Paige et al, 2009; Wagner et al, 2010). The suspicion of structural heart disease may be increased or decreased by the results of thoracic radiography with or without N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide testing (Côté et al, 2011b, 2011c; Ettinger, 2010; Fox et al, 2011), and confirmation requires echocardiography.


Reversible contributing factors to an arrhythmia are identified through routine laboratory tests. For example, hypokalemia, anemia, and hypoxemia can induce premature ventricular complexes and potentially render these refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment (Côté et al, 2011a). Such abnormalities may be identified or suspected via basic clinical testing (Figure 173-1).



The presence or absence of syncope is described by the owner; however, many owners cannot recognize the features of syncope. Since some cats produce subtle signs that could be explained either by syncope or by such nonsyncopal disorders as behavioral or metabolic disturbances, obtaining information during an episode can be enormously helpful. Owners may be instructed to record episodes on video at home for review by the veterinarian or to record an ECG during an episode via Holter or event monitoring. The information obtained is especially valuable when episodes are infrequent or ambiguous in their expression. It is also important to recognize that cats with syncope often are misdiagnosed with a seizure disorder because facial twitching and tonic-clonic motion are common signs of feline syncope. In feline medicine, it remains unresolved whether cats with clinical signs caused by bradyarrhythmias have cerebral hypoxia leading to an epileptic focus and true seizure activity or whether physical manifestations of syncope closely resemble seizure activity (Penning et al, 2009).


Finally, the heart rate generated during the arrhythmia may provide an indication that the cardiac output is too low because of inadequate diastolic filling time (tachycardias) or simply because of too few heartbeats per minute (bradycardias). Either extreme can produce similar signs of presyncope (transient ataxia and/or disorientation) or syncope, which emphasizes the need for an ECG diagnosis of the heart rhythm during such episodes for appropriate treatment selection and determination of an accurate prognosis.



Sinus Tachycardia


Normal sinus rhythm in the cat is evident when spontaneous automaticity in the sinoatrial node produces a heart rate of 110 to 180 beats/min. Each atrial depolarization leads to a ventricular depolarization. Therefore, on the ECG, each P wave is followed by a QRS complex at a fixed PR interval. The R-R interval is unchanging and thus the rate is constant, or if it changes, it does so gradually over a few heartbeats, not immediately from one beat to the next. These features are identical in sinus tachycardia, the equivalent of normal sinus rhythm but with a rate of more than 180 beats/min in cats (see Figure 173-1).




Particularities in Cats


A number of key points can be made regarding sinus tachycardia in cats:




Premature Atrial Complexes, Atrial Tachycardia, and Atrial Fibrillation


It may seem paradoxical that diseased heart tissue tends to fire more than normal, not less. The paradox is clarified by contrasting normal and abnormal cardiac cells. Healthy cardiomyocytes maintain a stable, inactivated state until triggered to depolarize, like dominos in a tumbling series, by each heartbeat’s advancing wave of normal electrical activity. Disruption of myocardial tissue interferes with this organized, sequential pattern of cardiac depolarization. In cats, myocyte stretch and myocardial interstitial fibrosis, in particular, are common atrial lesions that are associated with such disruptions (Boyden et al, 1984). These alterations render a cell less stable and more prone to depolarizing inappropriately. To continue the analogy, a single domino topples out in the periphery, creating a rogue heartbeat (ectopy) that propagates outward and commands the rhythm of the heart for that beat. A premature depolarization may not occur if it begins too prematurely, when the adjacent myocardium is refractory because all the dominos have tumbled and have not yet been prepared for the next tumble (i.e., have not yet repolarized).


This concept of premature depolarization applies to all chambers of the heart. In humans, these arrhythmias involve various substrates and mechanisms, like the origin of atrial fibrillation from the pulmonary venous-atrial junction, but these mechanisms have not been investigated in vivo in the cat. In the atria of cats, premature, spontaneous atrial depolarizations may occur singly (premature atrial complexes or PACs; synonyms include atrial premature complexes, atrial premature contractions, and premature atrial depolarizations), in a series of four or more from the same focus in the atrium (atrial tachycardia or AT), or as a series of chaotic, seemingly randomly generated atrial impulses (atrial fibrillation or AF) (see Figure 173-1). The ECG characteristics of these rhythms can be summarized as follows:



• PACs: Shorter R-R interval (i.e., the heartbeat occurs prematurely), with the P wave of the PAC (called P′ or P-prime) often superimposed on the normal T wave of the preceding beat. The morphology of the QRS complex is identical or nearly identical to that of a normal sinus QRS complex. The next sinus beat generally occurs at an interval that is not in phase with the expected timing of normal sinus rhythm had the PAC not occurred. This creates a noncompensatory pause following the PAC, which suggests that the PAC penetrated and reset the sinoatrial nodal cycle.


• AT: As described for PACs, but consisting of four or more consecutive PACs. The QRS following the initial PAC of the sequence occasionally may be different in morphology owing to abnormal ventricular conduction (aberrancy).


• AF: Absence of P waves in all ECG leads. The morphology of the QRS complex is identical or nearly identical to that of the normal sinus QRS complex, often with subtle variation in the QRS complexes. Fine baseline undulations (atrial fibrillation waves) are seen. The rhythm is irregularly irregular; that is, the R-R interval has no discernible consistency or pattern through the ECG tracing.


Since PACs, AT, and AF are associated so commonly with underlying structural heart disease, their detection should trigger an investigation of underlying cardiac structure through thoracic radiography and echocardiography.



Treatment


Specific antiarrhythmic treatment of PACs (individual, pairs, or triplets) is not necessary. They are considered markers of structural or electrical atrial disease, and treatment consists of managing the underlying disorder, if warranted (e.g., treatment of congestive heart failure if it is present; anticoagulation if there is marked atrial enlargement; correction of hypokalemia).


Specific treatment of AT and of AF in cats is similar and considered necessary if the resulting heart rate is excessive and persistent. A healthy cat in a veterinary examination room may have a heart rate of 260 beats/min because of anxiety, but such a heart rate (from sinus tachycardia) normally would decrease after several hours of hospitalization or after the cat returned home. A cat with AT or AF whose heart rate remains consistently at or above 280 beats/min in the hospital, or certainly while at home, can be expected to have reduced diastolic ventricular filling because of the tachycardia, and targeted treatment is warranted. In addition to treating any predisposing condition, management of atrial tachyarrhythmias can include either controlling the heart rate by suppressing the ectopic focus or blocking conduction down the AV node, or actually converting the ectopic activity back to normal. Sometimes spontaneous conversion is observed regardless of drug therapy, but AT and AF often are persistent or permanent rhythm disturbances.


In most cases, initial therapy for the cat with AT or AF involves a β-blocker, typically atenolol 6.25 to 12.5 mg per cat every 12 to 24 hours PO. A logical approach in the cat whose AT or AF is not producing overt signs of hemodynamic compromise (e.g., syncope) is to prescribe atenolol 6.25 mg every 24 hours PO, administered in the evening and followed up with a daytime appointment. If reevaluation reveals AT or AF with a persistently elevated heart rate (e.g., >200 beats/min) despite β-blockade, then the therapy can be surmised either to be ineffective or to last less than 24 hours (the case in about three quarters of cats by anecdotal observation). In this case the atenolol dosage is increased to 6.25 mg per cat every 12 hours PO. If a subsequent recheck identifies persistence of AT or AF with a ventricular response of more than 200 beats/min, the atenolol dosage may be increased to up to 12.5 mg every 12 hours PO, but excessive suppression of the heart rate must be avoided, especially in cats with impaired systolic function or congestive heart failure (see later). A recheck appointment always is warranted when higher dosages of atenolol are prescribed, to identify sluggishness or dyspnea and to document the heart rate and rhythm by ECG. Sotalol 20 mg per cat every 12 hours PO can be used as an alternative to atenolol, particularly if ventricular arrhythmias also are present.


β-Blockers potentially are dangerous in some settings. Excessive bradycardia can induce congestive heart failure in cats previously in stable condition. Importantly, in cats with congestive heart failure, β-blockers should be prescribed only after the reduction or elimination of pulmonary edema or voluminous pleural effusion with injectable diuretics or thoracocentesis, respectively, to avoid worsening any fluid retention.


An alternative to β-blockers for AT or AF is the calcium channel blocker diltiazem. This drug can block the AV node to reduce ventricular response rate to AT or AF. As with β-blockers it is sometimes associated with suppression of the rhythm disturbance. However, in the author’s opinion, the ability of oral calcium channel blockers to control the heart rate of cats with AT or AF is inferior to that of β-blockers.


Less commonly, when AT or AF with rapid ventricular rate is associated with an eccentrically hypertrophied or grossly dilated ventricle, such as that caused by ventricular septal defect or dilated cardiomyopathy, digoxin (0.01 mg/kg q48h PO) may be prescribed. This dosage typically corresponds to image of a 0.125-mg tablet every 48 hours PO and is preferred to the pediatric elixir, which many cats dislike. A β-blocker, or alternatively diltiazem, may be added if rate control is insufficient with digoxin alone. Diltiazem is dosed at 1 mg/kg every 8 hours PO, although current tablet sizes make this more difficult, and typically image of a 30-mg tablet per cat is given; extended-release versions also are available and typically are dosed at 15 mg per cat every 12 hours PO, although adverse gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary effects, and unpredictable pharmacokinetic effects, make these versions undesirable in the cat.


The prognosis for cats with PACs, AT, or AF is governed by the underlying cause. These three arrhythmias do not appear to confer a prognosis that is better or worse than the prognosis associated with the cat’s underlying structural heart disease (Atkins et al, 2001).

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 18, 2016 | Posted by in PHARMACOLOGY, TOXICOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS | Comments Off on Feline Cardiac Arrhythmias

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access