Diagnostic Methods

CHAPTER 2 Diagnostic Methods



The systematic approach


Skin diseases are unique in medicine because the lesions and the symptoms are external and potentially visible to the owner and practitioner. This difference offers several unique opportunities for the practitioner. The progression of skin lesions and diseases can often be determined with a good history. Incomplete histories may eventually be amended because the chronic, recurrent nature of many diseases allows the practitioner to instruct clients in what observations they should try to make. The educated client may then add relevant information about the course of the disease. The physical examination reveals the gross pathologic lesions that are present for direct examination. With no other organ system is this great amount of information so readily available.


To benefit optimally from these opportunities, the clinician uses a systematic approach; this greatly increases the probability of determining the correct diagnosis in the most cost-effective manner. Ideally, a thorough examination and appropriate diagnostic procedures are accomplished the first time that the patient is seen and before any masking treatment has been initiated. However, in practice, many clients are reluctant to spend money on diagnostic tests, particularly for the initial occurrence of a problem. This makes a thorough history and physical examination even more important, because they often are the only tools available for arriving at a differential diagnosis.


At the first visit, it is important to establish the client’s reliability as a historian and observer. The least expensive tool available to the practitioner is the education of the client about signs and symptoms to look for. The clinician can develop a better relationship with clients and gain valuable information by training clients in what they should observe and watch for, especially if there is a poor response to treatment or a recurrence. Spending some time educating the client in the value of this information often leads to better acceptance of the costs associated with future treatment.


A rational approach to the accurate diagnosis of dermatologic diseases is presented in Table 2-1.


TABLE 2-1 Steps to a Dermatologic Diagnosis

















































Major Step Key Points to Determine or Questions to Answer
Chief complaint Why is the client seeking veterinary care?
Signalment Record the animal’s age, breed, sex, and weight.
Dermatologic history Obtain data about the original lesion’s location, appearance, onset, and rate of progression. Also determine the degree of pruritus, contagion to other animals or people, and possible seasonal incidence.
Previous medical history Medical history that does not directly seem to relate should also be reviewed.
Client credibility Determine what the clients initially noticed that indicated a problem. Repeat questions and ask in a different way to determine how certain the clients are and whether they understand the questions.
Physical examination Determine the distribution pattern and the regional location of lesions. Certain patterns are diagnostically significant.
Closely examine the skin to identify primary and secondary lesions.
Determine skin and hair quality (e.g., thin, thick, turgid, elastic, dull, oily, or dry).
Observe the configurations of specific skin lesions and their relationship to each other.
Differential diagnosis Differential diagnosis is developed on the basis of the preceding data. The most likely diagnoses are recorded in order of probability.
Diagnostic or therapeutic plan A plan is presented to the client. The client and the clinician together then agree on a plan.
Diagnostic and laboratory aids Simple and inexpensive office diagnostic procedures that confirm or rule out any of the most likely (first three or four) differential diagnostic possibilities should be done.
More complex or expensive diagnostic tests or procedure are then recommended.
Clients may elect to forgo these tests and pursue less likely differential diagnostic possibilities in attempts to save money. Often, this approach is not cost-effective when the expense of inefficient medications and repeated examination is considered.
Trial therapy Clients may elect to pursue a therapeutic trial instead of diagnostic procedures. Trial therapies should be selected so that further diagnostic information is obtained. Generally, glucocorticoids are not acceptable because little diagnostic information is obtained.
Narrowing the differential diagnosis Plan additional tests, observations of therapeutic trials, and reevaluations of signs and symptoms to narrow the list and provide a definitive diagnosis.


Records


Recording historical facts, physical examination findings, and laboratory data in a systematic way is particularly important for patients with skin disease. Many dermatoses are chronic, and skin lesions may be slow to change. For this reason, many practitioners use outline sketches of the patient, which enable the clinician to draw the location and the extent of lesions.


Fig. 2-1 is a record form for noting physical examination and laboratory findings for dermatology cases. Most important, the form leads the clinician to consider the case in a systematic manner. It also enables one to apply pertinent descriptive terms, saves time, and ensures that no important information is omitted. This form details only dermatologic data and should be used as a supplement to the general history and physical examination record. A special dermatologic history form is also useful, especially for patients with allergies and chronic diseases (Fig. 2-2).




The disadvantage of the forms is that many chronic cases have tremendous variations in the type of lesions and their distribution, making a map confusing. Representing several different lesions on a small diagram is difficult or, if done, is often unreadable. This can make a diagram unsatisfactory to use. Therefore, the authors have found that brief written descriptions of lesions in various body regions are preferable to diagrams in complicated cases.



History



General Concepts


The horse’s disease is like an unsolved mystery in which the client is the witness to what has occurred and the veterinarian is the detective who must ascertain what the client observed. As this information is extracted, the veterinarian becomes the lawyer to determine whether the client is a credible or qualified witness. Obtaining a thorough history and being attentive to clues from the client are skills that must be practiced and developed by the clinician in order to develop a tentative diagnosis. A comprehensive history in conjunction with a thorough dermatologic examination is helpful for another practical reason: this is often when the veterinarian initially establishes her or his credibility as a professional with the client. In veterinary dermatology, the client-veterinarian relationship is often important for a successful outcome. Because many chronic diseases necessitate lifelong control and can be frustrating for client and veterinarian alike, it is critical for the client-veterinarian relationship to start well. If the veterinarian is thorough and obtains the most information possible from the history and the dermatologic examination, the client is more likely to recognize the effort and expertise of the veterinarian. These clients are often more agreeable to pursuing diagnostic tests or trial therapies if the information from the initial exhaustive examination is not sufficient for a diagnosis. Cursory examinations leave a sense of insecurity in some clients, making them reluctant to follow recommendations based on such examinations.








Medical History


The clinician should obtain a complete medical history in all cases. In practice, two levels of history are taken. The first level includes those questions that are always asked, and this level is often helped by having the client fill out a history questionnaire before the examination (see Fig. 2-2). Often, the answers on these forms will change if the client is questioned directly, so these form answers should be reviewed and not relied on as initially answered. The first level should initially include questions about previous illnesses and problems. The second level in history taking relates to more specific questions that relate to specific diseases. These more pertinent questions are usually asked once the practitioner has examined the animal and is developing a differential diagnosis or has at least established what some of the problems are. However, it is vital to use a systematic, detailed method of examination and history taking so that important information is not overlooked. A complete history takes a lot of time to obtain and usually is a major component of the initial examination period. In practice, many veterinarians do not take the time to collect a thorough history for the problem. Learning which historical questions are most important for specific problems and being certain to collect this information becomes critical. Often, the history is completed during the examination and once the initial differential diagnosis is determined.


The clinician who can draw out a complete history in an unbiased form has a valuable skill. It is important that the questions presented to the client do not suggest answers or tend to shut off discussion. Some owners purposely or unconsciously withhold pertinent facts, especially about neglect, diet, previous medication, or other procedures they think may not be well received by the examining veterinarian. Other pertinent information may be left out because some owners are not aware of what is normal. Therefore, they may not supply valuable information because they do not perceive the information to be significant or abnormal. In other cases, they may recognize something as abnormal but attribute the observation to some other, unrelated cause.


The clinician must become skillful at extracting all the relevant history and observations, regardless of the client’s perception of their importance. The skillful clinician is ever tuned to listen for side comments by the client or by the children. These may be veritable “pearls” of information in a mass of trivia. They also help to establish the client’s accuracy and credibility.


Next, the following information about the skin lesions should be obtained from the owner: the date and age at onset, the original locations, the initial appearance, the tendency to progression or regression, factors affecting the course, and previous treatment (home or proprietary remedies used, and veterinary treatment). In addition, treatments of other problems should be determined and recorded. The relationships between all treatments and the onset of, or changes in, the disease should be recorded and a possible drug reaction considered. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are diagnosed only when they are suspected, and because they may mimic any disease, the history aids in arriving at this diagnosis.


Almost all animals with skin disorders have been bathed, dipped, sprayed, or treated with one or more medications, and the owner may be reluctant or unable to disclose a complete list of previous treatments. It is important that the types of medication and the dates of application are completely divulged, because a modification of pertinent signs may have resulted.


Although the patient cannot relate subjective findings (symptoms such as itching, burning sensation, and pain), it is possible to determine the degree of pruritus reasonably well. The presence and severity of pain may also be evaluated in some cases by the patient’s response to stimuli: exhibiting shyness, pulling away, and responding with aggressiveness may be manifested when pain is provoked.


Pruritus is one of the most common presenting complaints and, in many cases, is a hallmark of allergy. The presence, location, and degree of itching are important criteria in the differential diagnosis of many skin diseases. The owner’s idea of the intensity of itching, however, may vary considerably from that of the veterinarian. Consequently, it is helpful to ask questions, such as “How many times daily do you see your horse rub, scratch, kick, or chew?” “Does it itch in many sites, or just a few?” “Does it shake its head?” “Does it stomp its feet?” “Does it lick the front legs or other areas?” “Does it rub parts of its body against things?” Because many diseases associated with pruritus are chronic, it may be helpful to have the client initially grade the itching on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being no itching at all, 1 being very mild, and 10 being as bad as the horse has ever itched. This level can be recorded and asked again as therapies or diagnostic procedures are tried to help determine how the horse’s problem changes over time. Also, by obtaining answers to the previous questions about the pruritus, the practitioner establishes a record of the severity of the problem and the symptoms seen when the owner indicates a level of itching. Over time, the client’s perceptions may change, and this approach allows any change to be determined and documented. It is also very helpful to determine, when possible, whether the pruritus involves initially normal-appearing skin (an itch that rashes, typical of allergy) or whether skin lesions precede or appear at the same time as the pruritus (a rash that itches, which may be seen with many disorders).


The same types of specific questions are helpful when discussing diets, because the owner often states the typical feedings and leaves out treats and supplements. Specifically, the clinician asks whether any vitamins, supplements, or treats are given. The clinician also asks about changes in food sources throughout the year.


Because contact irritants or allergens are important contributors to or causes of skin disease, it is necessary to inquire about the animal’s environment. Details about stables, paddocks, fields, bedding, grooming protocols, and so forth may be very important. Do the symptoms improve or resolve when the horse leaves its usual surroundings (travel, show, competition, boarding, and so forth)? Symptoms that resolve in a different environment are highly suggestive of a reaction to an environmental allergen or irritant. Other more organ-specific questions may also be asked, depending on the clinical suspicions of possible diseases.


In determining contagion, one should inquire about the skin health of other animals on the premises, and where the horse has been in the last 6 weeks. The presence of skin disease in the people living with the patient may also be highly significant in some disorders (e.g., dermatophytosis, sarcoptic mange).


At this point, the clinician usually has a general idea of the problem and is ready to proceed with a careful physical examination. In some cases, the clinician may want to come back to the medical history if further examinations indicate a more serious or underlying systemic disease.



Physical examination



General Observations


A good examination necessitates adequate lighting. Normal daylight without glare is best, but any artificial light of adequate candlepower is sufficient if it produces bright, non-color-changing, uniform lighting. The lamp should be adjustable to illuminate all body areas. A combination loupe and light provides magnification of the field and good illumination. Before the clinician concentrates on the individual lesions, the entire animal should always be observed from a distance of a couple of meters to obtain a general impression of abnormalities and to observe distribution patterns. Does the horse appear to be in good health? Is it fat or thin, unkempt or well-groomed? Is the problem generalized or localized? What is the distribution and configuration of the lesions? Are they bilaterally symmetric or unilaterally irregular? Is the hair coat shiny or dull, and if it is dull, what is the pattern of those changes? Is it an appropriate color and pattern of colors for its breed? Are coat changes in quality or color lifelong, or did they develop before or after the symptoms for which the horse is presented?


To answer some of these questions, the clinician must examine the patient more closely. The dorsal aspect of the body should be inspected by viewing it from the rear, as elevated hairs and patchy alopecia may be more obvious from that angle. Then, the head, the lateral trunk, and the extremities should be observed. Next, the clinician should complete a thorough dermatologic examination.



Dermatologic Examination


After an impression is obtained from a distance, the skin should be examined more closely and palpated. It is important to examine every square centimeter of skin and visible mucous membranes. Many subtle clues are located where the client is unaware of problems.


Many observations need to be made. What is the texture of the hair? Is it coarse or fine, dry or oily? Does it epilate easily? A change in the amount of hair is often a dramatic finding, although subtle thinning of the hair coat should also be noted. Alopecia is a complete lack of hair in areas where it is normally present. Hypotrichosis implies partial hair loss and is a form of alopecia. Is the thinning diffuse, or are there numerous small focal areas of alopecia (the latter being often seen with folliculitis)? Hypertrichosis is excessive hair, and it usually has hormonal causes.


The texture, elasticity, and thickness of the skin should be determined and impressions of heat or coolness recorded. There is variation in an animal’s coat density in different body areas, with skin lesions often being discerned more readily in sparsely haired regions. Therefore, the clinician must part or clip the hair in heavily haired areas to observe and palpate lesions that are present but obscured.


When abnormalities are discovered, it is important to establish their morphologic features, configuration, and general distribution. The clinician should try to appreciate the different lesions and their patterns. Together, they often represent the natural history of the skin disease.



Morphology of Skin Lesions


The morphologic characteristics of skin lesions, together with their history, are an essential feature of dermatologic diagnosis. Morphologic features and the medical and dermatologic history are often the only guidelines if laboratory procedures cannot be performed or do not yield useful information. The clinician must learn to recognize primary and secondary lesions. A primary lesion is the initial abnormality that develops spontaneously as a direct reflection of underlying disease. Secondary lesions evolve from primary lesions or are artifacts induced by the patients or by external factors such as trauma and medications. Primary lesions (pustules, vesicles, papules) may appear quickly and then disappear rapidly. However, they may leave behind secondary lesions (such as focal alopecia, epidermal collarettes, scaling, hyperpigmentation, and crusts), which may be more chronic and give clues about the presence of previous primary lesions. Therefore, the identification and the characterization of both primary and secondary lesions are important. Careful inspection of the diseased skin frequently reveals a primary lesion, which may suggest a limited differential diagnosis.


A primary lesion may vary slightly from its initial appearance to its full development. Later, through regression, degeneration, or traumatization, it may change in form and become a secondary lesion. Although classic descriptions and textbooks refer to lesions as primary or secondary, some lesions can be either (e.g., alopecia can be primary [from hereditary disorders] or secondary [from chewing because of pruritus]). Scales and pigment changes may also be primary or secondary.


Secondary lesions may also be informative. A ring of scaling usually follows a point source of inflammation, either a papule or a pustule. This is also true of small focal circular areas of alopecia. Yellow- to honey-colored crusts usually follow the rupture and drying of pustules. In many cases, however, the significant lesion must be differentiated from the mass of secondary debris. Variations of lesions and their configurations are common, because early and advanced stages coexist in most skin diseases. The ability to discover a characteristic lesion and understand its significance is an important aspect of mastering dermatologic diagnoses.


The following illustrations can help the clinician identify primary and secondary lesions. Also, the character of the lesions may vary, implying a different pathogenesis or cause. The definitions and examples in Figs. 2-32-27 explain the relationship of skin lesions to equine dermatoses.
































Different Stages


A skin disease and its individual lesions progress from its earliest appearance to a fully developed state and, in many cases, to a chronic or resolved stage. The distribution, the configuration, and the histologic appearance of lesions change. The evolution of lesions should be determined either by obtaining the history or by finding different stages of lesions on the patient. Papules may develop into vesicles and pustules, which may rupture to leave erosions or ulcers and finally crusts. An understanding of these progressions helps in the diagnostic process.


As lesions develop in specific patterns, they also involute in characteristic ways. The lesions change, along with their histologic appearance. For example, a macule may develop into a papule and then a crust or crusted erosion. It may then spread peripherally, occurring as a ring of lesions; the lesion then appears as a circular patch with multiple papules or crusts on the margins and central alopecia. The fully developed lesions could appear as a large alopecic patch with a central area of hyperpigmentation and multifocal erythematous macules, papules, or crusts intermittently along the leading margin; this lesion could then appear arciform. Scaling may also occur at the leading margins of inflammation. The healing phase of a chronic lesion may appear as a patch of alopecia and hyperpigmentation with no other primary or secondary lesions because they have spontaneously resolved or responded to therapy.


Because diseases and their lesions are evolutionary, the clinician must attempt to learn about all of the stages. The recognition of the different stages and the lesions becomes important when selecting areas to sample for diagnostic tests.



Distribution Patterns of Skin Lesions


The areas of skin involved with lesions or affected by symptoms of the disease help in determining the differential diagnosis because most skin diseases have a typical distribution. It is important to emphasize that the accurate determination of the distribution necessitates detection of all changes in the hair coat or the skin, the location of symptoms related to the disease, and the location of all primary and secondary lesions. An adequate determination of the distribution pattern can be achieved only by a thorough history and dermatologic examination; cursory examinations are often incomplete.


The study of skin diseases involves understanding the primary lesions that occur and the typical distribution patterns. Diseases less commonly present with atypical patterns. The combination of the type of lesions present and their distribution is the basis for developing a differential diagnosis. The distribution pattern may be very helpful by allowing clinicians to establish the differential diagnosis based on the region involved when animals have lesions and symptoms confined to certain regions (Tables 2-3 and 2-4). In some instances, this regional pattern is such a major feature that it is a required aspect of the disease. Cutaneous reaction patterns are also a very useful prompter for establishing a differential diagnosis (Table 2-5).


TABLE 2-3 Regional Differential Diagnosis for Nonneoplastic Dermatosesa



















































































































































































































































Region Common Diseases Uncommon/Rare Diseases
Head
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Besnoitiosis
Black fly bites Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
Dermatophytosis Demodicosis
Dermatophilosis Food allergy
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Forage mites
Photodermatitis (white skin) Multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease
Staphylococcal folliculitis Onchocerciasis
  Pemphigus foliaceus
  Poultry mites
  Sarcoidosis
  Sarcoptic mange
  Stachybotryotoxicosis
  Trombiculiasis
  Vaccinia
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Noninflammatory hair loss Alopecia areata
  Seasonal hypotrichosis
Pinnae
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Food allergy
Black fly bites Psoroptic mange
Dermatophytosis Sarcoptic mange
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Trombiculiasis
Photodermatitis (white skin) Vasculitis
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Neck
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Demodicosis
Black fly bites Erythema multiforme
Dermatophilosis Forage mites
Dermatophytosis Linear keratosis
Horse fly bites Onchocerciasis
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Sarcoptic mange
Pediculosis Sterile eosinophilic folliculitis
Stable fly bites Trombiculiasis
Staphylococcal folliculitis  
Urticaria  
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Noninflammatory hair loss Alopecia areata
  Linear alopecia
Trunk
Dermatitis Dermatophilosis Demodicosis
Dermatophytosis Linear keratosis
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Sterile eosinophilic folliculitis
Pediculosis Unilateral papular dermatosis
Staphylococcal folliculitis  
Urticaria  
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Ventrum (Abdomen, Groin, Axillae, Chest)
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Besnoitiosis
Black fly bites Food allergy
Horn fly bites Louse flies
Horse fly bites Malassezia dermatitis
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Onchocerciasis
Stable fly bites Pelodera dermatitis
  Poultry mites
  Trombiculiasis
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Legs
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Besnoitiosis
Black fly bites Cannon keratosis
Chorioptic mange Food allergy
Chronic progressive lymphedema Forage mites
Dermatophilosis Pemphigus foliaceus
Dermatophytosis Poultry mites
Horse fly bites Strongyloidosis
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Trombiculiasis
Photodermatitis (white skin) Vasculitis
Stable fly bites Zinc-responsive dermatitis
Staphylococcal folliculitis  
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Mane and tail
Dermatitis Atopic dermatitis Food allergy
Chorioptic mange Oxyuriasis
Insect-bite hypersensitivity Psoroptic mange
Pediculosis Seborrhea
Nodules (see Table 15-1)
Noninflammatory hair loss Alopecia areata
Follicular dysplasia
Genetic hypotrichosis
Mimosine toxicosis
Piedra
Selenosis
Trichorrhexis nodosa

a Cutaneous adverse drug reactions can mimic ANY dermatitis (see Chapter 9) and contact dermatitis can affect ANY body region (see Chapters 8 and 13).


TABLE 2-4 Common Localizations of Neoplasms, Cysts, Hamartomas, and Keratosesa














































































Neoplasms  
Viral papillomas Muzzle, lips, pinnae, genitalia
Squamous cell carcinoma Mucocutaneous junctions (especially eyelids and genitalia), nonpigmented/lightly haired areas
Basal cell tumor Distal legs, trunk, face, neck
Epitrichial sweat gland tumor Pinnae, vulva
Sarcoid Pinnae, lips, periocular area, neck, legs, ventrum
Fibroma Periocular area, neck, legs
Fibrosarcoma Periocular area, trunk, legs
Hemangioma Distal legs
Hemangiosarcoma Head, neck, trunk, proximal legs
Lymphangioma Axillae, groin
Lipoma Trunk, proximal legs
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Neck, proximal legs
Mast cell tumor Head, legs
Nonepitheliotropic lymphoma Head, neck, trunk, proximal legs
Melanocytoma Legs, trunk
Melanoma Perineum, ventral tail
Cysts  
Dermoid cyst Dorsal midline
Follicular cyst Distal legs, head
Heterotopic polyodontia Base of ear
Hamartoma  
Linear epidermal hamartoma Caudal cannon bone/pastern area of hind legs
Keratosis  
Actinic keratosis See Squamous Cell Carcinoma above

a See Chapter 16 for details.


TABLE 2-5 Differential Diagnosis for Some Cutaneous Reaction Patterns




































Nodules See Table 15-1
Pastern dermatitis See Table 15-3
Coronary band disorders See Table 15-4
Head shaking See Table 15-5
Mucocutaneous junctions Mucocutaneous pyoderma, candidiasis, Malassezia dermatitis, vesicular stomatitis, Jamestown Canyon virus, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, erythema multiforme, vasculitis, epidermolysis, bullosa (neonates), neonatal ulcerative dermatitis/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia (neonates), zinc-responsive dermatitis, stachybotryotoxicosis, multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease
Gangrene/necrosis External pressure (e.g., pressure sore), internal pressure (e.g., severe edema), burns, frostbite, snake bite, ergotism, vasculitis, clostridial infection, Salmonella septicemia (foals)
Subcutaneous emphysema Tracheal rupture, pneumomediastinum, penetrating wounds, clostridial infection
Exfoliative dermatitis (widespread scale/crust/alopecia) Dermatophytosis, dermatophilosis, pemphigus foliaceus, contact dermatitis, sarcoidosis, multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease, cutaneous adverse drug reaction, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary seborrhea, epitheliotropic lymphoma, dietary deficiency, iodism, arsenic poisoning
Depigmentation Postinflammatory (e.g., viral papillomatosis, pressure sore, ventral midline dermatitis, injury), cutaneous lupus erythematosus, herpes coital exanthema, vesicular stomatitis, dourine, vitiligo, reticulated leukotrichia, spotted leukotrichia, hyperesthetic leukotrichia, copper deficiency
Noninflammatory hair loss Abnormal shedding, anagen defluxion, telogen defluxion, follicular dysplasia (e.g., mane and tail) (young), genetic hypotrichosis (young), seasonal hypotrichosis (especially face), alopecia areata (also mane and tail), selenosis (mane and tail), mimosine toxicosis (mane and tail), trichorrhexis nodosa, piedra
Tail/rump rubbing Atopic dermatitis, insect-bite hypersensitivity, food allergy, pediculosis, chorioptic mange, psoroptic mange, Malassezia dermatitis (groin area), herpes coital exanthema, oxyuriasis, cutaneous adverse drug reaction, behavioral

These tables are useful in the differential diagnosis. However, the clinician must also be aware that other diseases may occur in these regions and that diseases that often affect a certain region can also occur elsewhere and not involve the typical region. Therefore, regional evaluations aid in ranking differential diagnostic possibilities: they do not determine the diagnosis.





Laboratory procedures


This section includes a description of the common laboratory procedures used in the evaluation of equine skin disorders. The busy equine practitioner may not have the equipment and the time necessary to complete the examinations described. However, the following discussions will allow the practitioner to take the appropriate samples and send them to a diagnostic laboratory.



Surface Sampling Plan


The lesions and pathologic changes of a skin disease are often readily available for study, and a variety of laboratory tests are based on this easy access to the skin’s surface. A great deal of information may be obtained by studying microscopically materials collected from the hair and skin. Skin scraping and obtaining an acetate tape impression are techniques used to find microscopic ectoparasites. Hairs may be removed, and exudates may be collected and examined microscopically. Most of these techniques may be done in general clinical practice and rapidly add valuable information to a case work-up. However, practice and study may be necessary to maximize the benefits of many tests. The effort to learn these techniques is well worth the time. The alternatives are not to obtain this information, to do other more expensive and time-consuming tests, or to send samples to a laboratory, which adds cost and time delays.



Skin scraping


Skin scraping is used primarily for the demonstration of microscopic ectoparasites, especially mites. The procedure is quick, simple, and inexpensive, but is of limited value in the horse because mites are an uncommon cause of equine skin disease. It is important to realize that, although testing may accurately confirm diseases, its sensitivity for ruling out a diagnosis depends on the disease and the aggressiveness of sampling. The equipment needed to perform a skin scraping is mineral oil, a scalpel blade (with or without a handle) or a curet, microscope slides, coverslips, and a microscope. For some superficial parasites (e.g., Chorioptes, chiggers, lice), sampling can be accomplished by combing. A fine-toothed comb, such as a flea or louse comb, can be used to comb surface debris into a plastic Petri dish.


Not all skin scrapings are made in the same way. Success in finding parasites is enhanced if the technique of scraping is adapted to the specific parasite that the clinician expects to find. No matter which type of scraping is made, a consistent, orderly examination of the collected material should be done until a diagnosis is made or all the collected material has been examined. It is easiest to start the examination at one end of the scraped material, which has been mixed with oil, and move the microscope stage straight across the slide in either a horizontal or a vertical direction. At the end of the slide, the examination moves over one field of vision and goes back in the opposite direction. This is continued back and forth until all the scraped material on the slide has been examined.


The following discussions elaborate on the special techniques needed to enhance the effectiveness of scraping for specific parasites.



Deep skin scrapings


Deep skin scrapings are used to diagnose demodectic mange and Pelodera dermatitis. Generally, multiple scrapings from new lesions should be obtained. The affected skin should be squeezed between the thumb and the forefinger, if possible, to extrude the mites or nematodes from the hair follicles. The obtained material is scraped up and placed on a microscope slide. It is helpful to apply a drop of mineral oil to the skin site being scraped, or to the scalpel blade or curet, to facilitate the adherence of material to the blade. Then, additional material is obtained by scraping the skin more deeply, until capillary bleeding is produced. It is important that true capillary bleeding is obtained and not blood from the laceration. Generally, two or three drops of mineral oil are added to the usual amount of scraped material on the microscope slide. The oil is mixed with the scraped material to obtain an even consistency. Placing a coverslip on the material to be examined ensures a uniform layer that is more readily examined. Lowering the condenser causes more light diffraction and contrast, resulting in easier recognition of the mites.


Diagnosis of demodicosis is made by demonstrating multiple adult mites, finding adult mites from multiple sites, or finding immature forms of mites (ova, larvae, and nymphs). Horses harbor two species of Demodex mites, Demodex caballi, and D. equi (see Chapter 6). Scrapings taken from a normal horse, especially from the face, may contain an occasional adult mite. If one or two mites are observed, repeated scrapings should be done. Multiple positive results of scrapings from different sites should be considered abnormal. Observing whether the mites are alive (mouthparts or legs moving) or dead is of prognostic value while the animal is being treated. As a case of Demodex infestation responds to treatment, the ratio of live to dead mites decreases, as does the ratio of eggs and larvae to adults. If this is not occurring, the treatment regimen should be reevaluated.


Diagnosis of Pelodera dermatitis is made by demonstrating any Pelodera strongyloides nematodes (see Chapter 6).



Superficial skin scrapings


Superficial skin scrapings are used to diagnose chorioptic mange, psoroptic mange, sarcoptic mange, trombiculiasis, and forage and poultry mite infestations. It may be necessary to clip long-haired areas (e.g., fetlock) before sampling. Multiple superficial scrapings are indicated. Skin that has not been excoriated, preferably skin with raised papules and crusts on top, should be scraped. The more scrapings are performed, the more likely is a diagnosis. However, even with numerous scrapings, sarcoptic mange cannot be ruled out because of negative results.


Extensive amounts of material should be accumulated in the scrapings and spread on microscope slides. Double-sized coverslips are sometimes useful. Alternatively, a second microscope glass slide may be used instead of a normal coverslip to compress the thick crusts. The clinician examines each field until a mite is found or all material has been examined; one mite is diagnostic. Dark brown, round or oval fecal pellets or ova from adult mites, if found, are also diagnostic. In difficult cases, it may be useful to accumulate an even larger amount of hair and keratin debris from scrapings. The material is placed in a warm solution of 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) for 20 min to digest keratin, and the mixture is then stirred and centrifuged. Mites are thus concentrated and can often be picked off the surface film and identified with a microscope. Chorioptes equi is a fast-moving mite, and it is a good idea to add an acaricidal or insecticidal agent to the mineral oil before sampling.


The most common chigger mite is Eutrombicula alfreddugesi (see Chapter 6). These mites can be seen with the naked eye. They appear as bright orange objects adhering tightly to the skin or centered in a papule. They are easily recognized by their large size, relatively intense color, and tight attachment to the skin. They should be covered with mineral oil and picked up with a scalpel blade. A true skin scraping is not needed. However, when removed from the host for microscopic examination, they should immediately be placed in mineral oil, or they may crawl away. Only the larval form is pathogenic, and these have only six legs.


Dermanyssus gallinae is a mite that attacks poultry, wild and cage birds, horses, and humans. It is red when engorged with blood; otherwise, it is white, gray, or black. When the animal shows evidence of itching and the history indicates exposure to bird or poultry housing, a skin scraping for this mite is indicated. The best place to find the mites is at excoriated sites. The clinician collects the debris, scales, and crusts that harbor the mites. The materials are placed on a microscope slide, and several drops of mineral oil are added. The slide is covered with another glass slide instead of a coverslip. The two slides are squeezed together firmly to crush any crusted material. The acetate tape method of collection may be used successfully.




Hair Examination


Plucking hairs from the skin and examining them under the microscope is referred to as trichography and is helpful for diagnosing self-inflicted alopecia, dermatophytosis, piedra, nutritional or congenital hair dysplasias, trichorrhexis nodosa, anagen defluxion, telogen defluxion, and pigmentary disturbances of hair growth. Trichography is performed by grasping a small number of hairs with the fingertips or rubber-covered hemostats, epilating them completely in the direction of their growth, laying them in the same orientation on a microscope slide with mineral oil, and examining them with the low-power objective of the microscope. Epilating hairs in other directions or with uncovered hemostats can produce confusing artifacts. If abnormalities are detected during scanning, closer examination will be necessary to categorize the defect.


Hairs will have either an anagen or telogen root (bulb). Anagen bulbs are rounded, smooth, shiny, glistening, and often pigmented and soft, so the root may bend (Fig. 2-28). Telogen bulbs are club- or spear-shaped, rough-surfaced, nonpigmented, and generally straight (Fig. 2-29). A normal hair shaft is uniform in diameter and tapers gently to the tip. All hairs should have a clearly discernible cuticle and a sharply demarcated cortex and medulla. Hair pigmentation depends on the coat color and breed of horse, but should not vary greatly from one hair to the next in regions where the coat color is the same.




Normal adult animals have an admixture of anagen and telogen hairs, the ratio of which varies with season, management factors, and a variety of other influences (see Chapter 1). No normal animal should have all of its hairs in telogen (Fig. 2-30); therefore, this finding suggests a diagnosis of telogen defluxion or follicular arrest (see Chapter 10).



Examination of the hair shaft follows bulbar evaluation. Hairs that are inappropriately curled, misshapen, and malformed suggest an underlying nutritional, metabolic, or hereditary disease (Fig. 2-31). Hairs with a normal shaft that are suddenly and cleanly broken (Fig. 2-32) or longitudinally split (trichoptilosis) indicate external trauma from excessive rubbing, chewing, licking or scratching, or too vigorous grooming. Breakage of hairs with abnormal shafts can be seen in congenitohereditary disorders (see Chapter 14), trichorrhexis nodosa (see Chapter 10), anagen defluxion (see Chapter 10), alopecia areata (see Chapter 9), and dermatophytosis (Figs. 2-33 and 2-34; see Chapter 5). Abnormalities in hair pigmentation have not been well-studied. When unusual pigmentation is observed, external sources (e.g., chemicals and topical medications, sun bleaching) or conditions that influence the transfer of pigment to the hair shaft (e.g., drugs, nutritional imbalances, endocrine disorders, idiopathic pigmentary disorders) must be considered. Hair casts are usually seen in diseases associated with follicular keratinization abnormalities, such as primary seborrhea and follicular dysplasia. Hair casts should not be confused with louse nits (Fig. 2-35).








Cytologic Examination


An enormous amount of vital diagnostic data can be obtained by microscopic examination of stained material, such as smears of tissues or fluids, during a clinical examination. It is possible to accomplish this with minimal equipment and in less than 5 min. The cost is much less than that for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing or biopsy. Although the same information as obtained by these more expensive tests is not really gathered, microscopic examination often supplies sufficient data to narrow a differential diagnosis and develop a diagnostic plan.


The type of inflammatory, neoplastic, or other cellular infiltrate; the relative amount of protein or mucin; and the presence of acantholytic keratinocytes, fungi, and bacteria can be determined by cytologic evaluation. It is the most common and most rewarding office test performed by the authors. The equipment includes a clean microscope slide, a coverslip, a stain, and a microscope.



Specimen collection


Materials for cytologic examination can be gathered by a variety of techniques. Those most commonly used by the authors include direct smears, impression smears, swab smears, and fine needle aspiration. In most situations, clipping the hair should be the only preparation of the surface. Scrubbing and applying alcohol or disinfectants are used only in areas where a fine needle aspirate of a mass lesion is to be done.


Direct smears are usually performed for fluid-containing lesions. A small amount of material is collected with the tip of a needle. The material is then smeared on the microscope slide.


Impression smears are often obtained when lesions are moist or greasy. This technique is also used after removing crusts, expressing fluid from lesions, or gently opening the surface of papules, pustules, or vesicles. The microscope slide is pressed directly against the site to be examined.


Swab smears are most often used to obtain specimens from draining tracts or sinuses, intertriginous areas, and ear canals. The cotton-tipped applicator is moistened and inserted into the tract, the sinus, the fold, or the ear canal. After the lesion has been sampled, the cotton tip is rolled over the surface of the microscope slide.


Fine-needle aspiration is most commonly used to sample nodules, tumors, and cysts, although pustules, vesicles, or bullae may also be sampled this way. Fluid-filled lesions can be aspirated with 20- to 23-gauge needles and a 3-mL syringe. Firm lesions should be aspirated with 20-gauge needles and 6- or 10-mL syringes to obtain better suction. Fibrotic or dense masses may necessitate the use of an 18-gauge needle to get an adequate sample. For small lesions, a 25-gauge needle may be necessary. The needle is introduced into the lesion, and then suction is gently applied by withdrawing the plunger of the syringe. Little withdrawing is necessary for fluid-filled lesions, and the material within the needle is sufficient. In mass lesions, the plunger is withdrawn one-half to three-fourths of the syringe volume. Suction is then interrupted while the needle is redirected into another area of the mass. Suction is again applied, and this procedure is repeated for a total of three or four times. Suction is then released, and the needle is withdrawn from the lesion. The syringe and the needle are then separated, air is introduced into the syringe, the needle is reattached, and the contents of the needle and hub are expelled onto the surface of a glass slide. The material is then streaked across the surface with another glass slide or the needle.




Cytologic findings


Cytologic study is helpful to distinguish between bacterial skin infection and bacterial colonization, to determine the relative depth of infection, to conclude whether the pustule contains bacteria or is sterile, to discover yeasts and fungi, to identify various cutaneous neoplasms, or to find the acantholytic cells of the pemphigus diseases. Samples obtained by impression smears or swabs usually contain variable numbers of keratinocytes. Typically, the keratinocytes are anuclear corneocytes. Many corneocytes will be rolled-up, deeply basophilic, and spiculelike. Corneocytes contain variable amounts of melanin granules (brown or black in Diff Quik-stained specimens), reflecting the animal’s normal pigmentation. If the skin is parakeratotic, nucleated corneocytes will be present. Occasionally, cells from the stratum granulosum are recognized by their keratohyalin granules (blue or purple in Diff Quik-stained specimens). Keratohyalin granules vary in size and shape and should not be confused with bacteria.


Bacteria are a frequent finding in impression smears from skin and can be seen as basophilic-staining organisms in specimens stained with new methylene blue or Diff Quik. Although identification of the exact species of bacteria is not possible with a stain (as it is in a culture), it is possible to distinguish cocci from rods and often to institute appropriate and effective antibiotic therapy without performing a culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Generally, when cocci are seen, they are Staphylococcus pseudintermedius or S. aureus. If no bacteria are found in the stained fluid, the clinical condition is probably not a bacterial pyoderma. If neither granulocytes nor intracellular bacteria are seen, even large numbers of bacteria are not likely to be of etiologic significance.


It is also possible to obtain some clues as to the type of bacterial pyoderma or the underlying condition. In general, deep infections have fewer bacteria present, with the vast majority being intracellular. In addition, deep infections have a mixed cellular infiltrate with large numbers of neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. The presence of these cells suggests that longer-term antibiotic therapy is necessary. Large numbers of intracellular and extracellular cocci are seen more commonly in superficial bacterial infections (Figs. 2-36 and 2-37), and the inflammatory cells are almost exclusively neutrophils.



Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 8, 2016 | Posted by in EQUINE MEDICINE | Comments Off on Diagnostic Methods

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access