Only a few studies treating diarrhea in dogs with tylosin have been published. Van Kruiningen (1976) reported more than 30 years ago that tylosin was effective in the treatment of unspecific canine diarrhea. Recently the author’s study group performed three prospective clinical trials to obtain more information on TRD (Kilpinen et al, 2011; Westermarck et al, 2005). The first study consisted of 14 adult client-owned dogs of 12 different breeds. Each dog’s diet remained unchanged throughout the study. All dogs had chronic or intermittent diarrheal signs for a period of longer than 1 year. All dogs previously had been treated successfully with tylosin for at least 6 months. Tylosin had been discontinued at least twice, but the diarrhea always recurred. These dogs then were considered to have TRD. When the study commenced, all dogs had been on tylosin for at least 1 month and were healthy and free of diarrhea. Tylosin then was discontinued, and the dogs were monitored for a period of up to 1 month to determine whether signs of diarrhea would reappear. Diarrhea reappeared in 12 of 14 dogs (85.7%) within 30 days. Tylosin, prednisone, or a probiotic treatment trial was initiated when diarrhea was present. Tylosin resulted in resolution of diarrhea in all dogs within 3 days of initiation of therapy, with most resolving within 24 hours. In contrast, prednisone did not completely resolve diarrheal signs, and the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG did not prevent the relapse of diarrhea in any of the dogs.
In a second study seven beagles with chronic diarrhea for at least 1 month were identified from an experimental dog colony. Treatment trials of antibiotics, prednisone, and diet were applied. Tylosin was administered for 10 days, and during that time the feces became significantly firmer, although they remained unacceptably loose. When the treatment was discontinued, diarrhea reappeared within 3 weeks. Next treatment trials with other antibiotics (metronidazole, trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, or doxycycline) and prednisone had almost no effect on fecal consistency in these dogs. The diet was then changed for a 10-day period from a highly digestible moist pet food to a dry food developed for normal adult dogs. The feces again became significantly firmer, although the fecal consistency remained loose in some dogs. The dry food feeding period was then extended to 3 months, and the fecal consistency continued to fluctuate from ideal to diarrhea. Because the consistency was not satisfactory on diet alone, tylosin was added to the therapy for 10 days. The fecal consistency became normal and remained so throughout the entire 3-month follow-up time of this study. The study demonstrated that, in this group of experimental dogs having chronic diarrhea, the fecal consistency became significantly firmer using tylosin in conjunction with dietary modification. Neither treatment alone was sufficient to obtain ideal fecal consistency, but when the dogs were treated simultaneously with both regimens, ideal fecal consistency was achieved and maintained. The study suggests that tylosin and feeding regimens had a synergic effect.
In the author’s latest placebo-controlled randomized, double-blinded, prospective clinical trial on dogs with suspected TRD the effect of tylosin on fecal consistency is assessed compared with a placebo treatment. In addition, the author wanted to determine whether tylosin in dogs with recurrent diarrhea is as effective as empiric studies and anecdotal reports suggest. The proportion of dogs with normal fecal consistency at the end of the 7-day treatment period was 85% in the tylosin group and 29% in the placebo group. These findings indicated that tylosin was significantly more effective than the placebo in treating recurrent diarrhea in dogs.