Veterinary Challenges of Mixed Species Exhibits

Chapter 4 Veterinary Challenges of Mixed Species Exhibits



Modern zoos like to show larger groups of animals, preferably in natural habitat–like mixed species exhibits, but it is not always easy to combine different species in one exhibit. The size of an exhibit is essential when mixing animals, especially when mixing larger mammals. Aviaries and aquaria are examples with a long-standing experience of combining various species, but in mammals this experience is often poor. Most often, zoos still show single species exhibits because of lack of space or simply to prevent problems associated with mixing different species. Safari parks in Europe were very popular in the 1960s, showing more natural displays of animals. However, because of the difficulties of handling animals in mixed exhibits, many of these parks later closed their gates. The parks that remained and still exist gained experience regarding which species may be kept together with others and which species shouldn’t be mixed. The main advantage of mixed species enclosures is behavioral enrichment (Fig. 4-1) and the obvious educational value. There are even mixed species exhibits of carnivores. For example, Dierenrijk in Nuenen, The Netherlands, combines European grey wolves (Canis lupus) with European brown bears (Ursus arctos; Fig. 4-2) and Gelsenkirchen Zoo, Germany, combines arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) with Kodiak bears (Ursus arctos middendorffi; Fig. 4-3).





In this chapter, an incomplete listing of diseases and problems is presented to make the reader aware of the broad variety of veterinary challenges of mixed species exhibits. It is meant to encourage ideas and suggest further reading in veterinary literature about specific diseases and problems when mixing different species of animals. Veterinary problems arising because of keeping different species together may be categorized as trauma, nutrition-related problems, infectious diseases, and parasitic diseases.



Trauma


In mixed species exhibits, trauma is the most frequent and serious cause of health problems (Fig. 4-4).6 Competition for nesting sites in birds, establishment of territories, and competition for food and watering stations in all taxa may provoke fighting and trauma in mixed exhibits such as aviaries and large exhibits of mammals. For example, young antelopes born outside will be chased in the beginning of their lives by curious zebras, leading to death or a fatal myopathy, as has also been seen in young or newborn giraffes1 and antelopes. Play of young animals may not be understood by other species (Fig. 4-5). Pinioned birds fly in unrecognizable ways in the eyes of other animals and may become victims of other birds or mammals. Another factor is that when animals are frightened because of thunder or other events, or when animals are chased by other animals because of unexpected or differing circumstances, fleeing against fences or walls may cause fatal trauma.




Seasonal aggression, especially in deer (rut), may lead to interspecies conflicts, but different males of the Artiodactylae family will fight intraspecifically over their territory or interspecifically with other animals to protect their herd (Fig. 4-6). Antlers and horns are weapons capable of causing stab wounds, fractures, or even immediate death. Capping horns and cutting of antlers may limit the severity of trauma.6



After traumatic injuries, pathologic studies should always be carried out. For example, when birds kill one another, pathology often reveals underlying disease and explains the noticed aggression.6


To prevent trauma, next to appropriate size of the exhibit, pole gates (creeps), where small animals can flee from larger animals, creation of large obstacles in exhibits so animals may circle around these when chased, hiding places, and provision of multiple feeding and watering sources are workable preventive measures when planning mixed exhibits.6 There is no definition of an appropriate size, but for animal welfare reasons and to avoid trauma, exhibits should be as large as possible.




Infectious Diseases


Various herpesviruses are known to be responsible for disease outbreaks in mixed species exhibits. Other viruses such as rabies or bacteria (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex) or a variety of endoparasite, ectoparasite, or fungal infections (e.g., aspergillosis) may each be detrimental in mixed exhibits, because not only one species will be infected, as in single-species exhibits. Measures to control these diseases may have an enormous impact on a collection and demands for an effective preventative veterinary protocol. Decisions about which species are to be housed together should be made based on this information.



Mammals


Malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) is probably the first infectious disease that a zoo veterinarian thinks of when asked about the risks of mixed exhibits. The gammaherpesvirus hosted by wildebeest (Connochaetes spp.), topi (Damaliscus spp.), hartebeest (Alcelaphalus spp.); (Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 [AIHV-1]), sheep (subfamily Ovinae; ovine herpesvirus 2 [ OvHV-2]) and goats (subfamily Caprinae; caprine herpesvirus 2 [CpHV-2]) is shed (mostly) around parturition and may infect other species. Giraffes (Giraffa camelopardis), muskox (Ovibos moschatus), European and American bison (Bison bonasus and Bison bison), muntjac (Muntiacus species), Pere David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus), moose (Alces alces), kudu (Tragelaphus spp.) and other deer (Cervidae spp.), gaur (Bos gaurus), and banteng (Bos javanicus) are especially susceptible to these diseases.4,5 In white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a new MCF virus has been recognized that causes classic MCF. Do not mix wildebeest with giraffes and preferably get rid of all sheep and goats in a zoo collection. Carrier species should at least not be in breeding situations in direct contact or close to susceptible species. There are examples of zookeepers owning sheep at home that transmitted the virus to giraffes, resulting in high mortality.7 It is questionable whether zookeepers should be allowed to take care of household sheep and goats at home.


Equine herpesvirus 1 has led to problems with Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus), llama (Lama glama), and a Thompson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsoni).6 The virus is shed by infected horses (Equus caballus), zebra (E. grevyi, E. zebra, E. quagga), and onager ( E. hemionus) during respiratory infection, parturition, and abortion. Vaccination is no guarantee for preventing an outbreak. When introducing equids into mixed exhibits, it is advisable to use only seronegative equids.


Mixed exhibits with ruminants should be monitored serologically for diseases such as leptospirosis, brucellosis, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR; bovine herpesvirus 1 [BHV-1]), bovine virus diarrhea (BVD), tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. bovis), paratuberculosis (M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis), leucosis (enzootic bovine leucosis, bovine leukemia virus), neosporosis (Neospora caninum), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV; e.g., ovine lentivirus, Maedi–Visna)—because most of these diseases spread between different ruminant species. Brucellosis, leptospirosis, and tuberculosis will also affect numerous other mammalian species.4


The following are other mammalian diseases4:


Aug 27, 2016 | Posted by in EXOTIC, WILD, ZOO | Comments Off on Veterinary Challenges of Mixed Species Exhibits

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access