Ultrasonographic Assessment of Thawing in Sea Breams (Sparus aurata)

 

1 Fresh
2 After the first thawing
3 After the second thawing
Mean (± SD)
12.79 (±5.06)
19.56 (±5.07)
27.23 (±3.64)
Median (± SD)
9.29 (±6.01)
18.17 (±5.76)
23.26 (±3.59)
P*
1 vs. 2
2 vs. 3
1 vs. 3
Mean
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Median
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
*Significance level P < 0.05
Table 28.2
Mean (± SD) of SOS, BUA, BMD, and QUI values and P values of the ANOVA comparison among the three groups of sea breams
 
1 Fresh
2 After the first thawing
3 After the second thawing
SOS (± SD)
1,552.11 (±6.2)
1,556.68 (±16.3)
1,550.83 (±9.7)
BUA (± SD)
13.31 (±22.1)
57.48 (±37.9)
76.81 (±16.8)
BMD (± SD)
0.37 (±0.05)
0.50 (±0.11)
0.53 (±0.05)
QUI (± SD)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 17, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Ultrasonographic Assessment of Thawing in Sea Breams (Sparus aurata)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access