Ultrasonographic Assessment of Thawing in Sea Breams (Sparus aurata)

 

1 Fresh

2 After the first thawing

3 After the second thawing

Mean (± SD)

12.79 (±5.06)

19.56 (±5.07)

27.23 (±3.64)

Median (± SD)

9.29 (±6.01)

18.17 (±5.76)

23.26 (±3.59)

P*

1 vs. 2

2 vs. 3

1 vs. 3

Mean

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

Median

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001


*Significance level P < 0.05




Table 28.2
Mean (± SD) of SOS, BUA, BMD, and QUI values and P values of the ANOVA comparison among the three groups of sea breams






























 
1 Fresh
2 After the first thawing
3 After the second thawing

SOS (± SD)
1,552.11 (±6.2)
1,556.68 (±16.3)
1,550.83 (±9.7)

BUA (± SD)
13.31 (±22.1)
57.48 (±37.9)
76.81 (±16.8)

BMD (± SD)
0.37 (±0.05)
0.50 (±0.11)
0.53 (±0.05)

QUI (± SD)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Related posts:

  1. Nucleofection of Ovine Amniotic Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  2. Serum Amyloid A, Fibrinogen, and Haptoglobin as Inflammation Markers in the Horse: Preliminary Results
  3. Association Analysis Between DNA Markers and Number of Functional Teats in Italian Large White Pigs
  4. Study of the Resistance Variability of Anisakis Larvae to Some Technological Stressors

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Tags:
Sep 17, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Ultrasonographic Assessment of Thawing in Sea Breams (Sparus aurata)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

 Get Clinical Tree app for offline access