Treatment – behavior modification techniques

Chapter 7 Treatment – behavior modification techniques





Education of the family


The ultimate success of treating the problem is directly related to the degree of owner comprehension and compliance. Since family members themselves will carry out the behavioral modification in most cases, they must understand their roles and the techniques they will be required to perform.


The family must understand normal needs and behavior for cats and dogs. Providing pets with appropriate outlets for play, exercise, elimination, chewing, and digging may be all that is required to solve some problems. It is also necessary to provide some explanation of how animals communicate and learn. The use of some behavior modification tools will also likely need to be discussed.


With education, clients can understand more clearly which problems are most likely to be completely eliminated, which are likely to be only decreased, and which are unlikely to be changed. Once the family is well informed about the situation and treatment options, the decision may be made to live with the problem rather than institute the necessary steps for corrections, while others may decide that rehoming or euthanasia are safer, more appropriate choices for their circumstances (Table 7.1).


Table 7.1 Examples of problems and information for owners



























Problem Owner education required
Fear-related aggression
Canine housesoiling
Feline inappropriate toileting
Feline spraying
Unruly dog
Canine destructive behavior
Feline play aggression


Modification of the environment


Environmental modification involves managing various aspects of the pet’s environment in order to diminish the performance or intensity of the behavior. A number of variables can be controlled, including confinement areas, exposure to eliciting stimuli, access to people, access to other animals, access to targets of the behavior, and modification of targets (Table 7.2).


Table 7.2 Ways to modify the environment to encourage desirable and prevent undesirable behavior













































Change Example
Identify and remove the cause


Reduce the opportunity to misbehave





Provide an environment conducive to the pet’s needs




Change the behavioral function of an area
Make the area or object aversive



Modification of the pet’s behavior



Change the behavior with surgery


Castration decreases gonadal hormones which might decrease sexually dimorphic behaviors, including sexual arousal, masturbation, urine marking, mounting, and perhaps some forms of aggression.13 However, the results of neutering studies have been somewhat conflicting. For example, one recent study found no effect of neutering on intermale aggression, roaming, or mounting.4 Another study suggested that neutering does not appear to decrease the likelihood of aggression in male dogs with perhaps the exception of some cases of territorial and intermale aggression.5 In yet another study, the odds ratio of biting a member of the household was highest for neutered male dogs followed by neutered female dogs, intact male dogs, and intact females. Some studies also suggest that spayed females are more likely to display certain types of aggression when compared with intact females.68 While the cause has not been determined, it may be due to a decrease in estrogen and oxytocin concentrations, both of which may have some antianxiety effects.9 Ovariohysterectomy of dogs and cats eliminates behaviors associated with estrus cycles and pseudocyesis in dogs and reduces risk of mammary cancer if before 2nd or 3rd heat cycle. In dogs, castration is useful in the prevention or treatment of prostatic disease, testicular cancer, perianal tumors, and perineal hernias (Table 7.3).


Table 7.3 Potential behavioral benefits of castration13























Behavior Effects of castration
Undesirable sexual behavior


Urine marking
Aggression



1Hart BL. Effects of neutering and spaying on the behavior of dogs and cats: questions and answers about practical concerns. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;198:1204.


2Hart BL, Eckstein RA. The role of gonadal hormones in the occurrence of objectionable behaviours in dogs and cats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997;52:351.


3Hopkins SG, Schubert TA, Hart BL. Castration of adult male dogs: effects on roaming, aggression, urine marking, and mounting. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976;168:1108–1110.


Other surgical procedures that have been used for certain behavior problems include olfactory tractotomy for refractory spraying cases, dental disarming, declawing, and devocalization. Many of these procedures are only considered as a last-resort alternative to euthanasia, and in some countries are deemed to be inhumane or even illegal. Surgery or medical therapy might also be necessary when an underlying medical condition (e.g., hyperthyroidism, anal sacculitis, chronic otitis) is causing or contributing to the behavioral signs.




The use of behavior products to modify behavior


There are a wide variety of products that can be useful in the prevention and management of undesirable behavior in pets. Products have been developed for control and training (head halters, body harnesses), positive reinforcement (clicker, Manner’s minder), environmental enrichment, deodorizing soiled areas, desensitization and counterconditioning (e.g., CDs and DVDs for noise desensitization). In addition, new tools have been designed that might play a role in reducing anxiety (calming music CDs, anxiety wrap, Thundershirt) or for reducing the stimuli that might cause anxiety (Thunder band, Mutt Muffs, calming cap, Storm Defender cape). These are described throughout the text and a list of some of the product manufacturers can be found in Appendix B. Although the focus of behavior therapy should be placed squarely on the training and reinforcement of what is desirable, pet owners also need strategies for prevention, interruption, and avoidance of undesirable behaviors. Therefore, a brief overview of these products is provided in Box 7.1.



Box 7.1


Products to manage undesirable behavior (client handout #21, printable version available online)


There are a wide variety of products that can be useful in correcting or managing undesirable behavior in pets. Devices that are activated by the owner can be used to interrupt a behavior so that the desirable response can be achieved or may serve as a punisher so that the pet is less likely to repeat the act in the future. However, behavior is likely to continue in the owner’s absence, especially if it is rewarding (e.g., garbage raiding), comforting (e.g., sleeping on the couch) or brings relief (e.g., elimination) since there are no unpleasant consequences associated with the behavior when the owner is not watching. Therefore remote punishment or avoidance devices (booby traps) might be more effective, so that the pet associates the punishment with the act, and not with the owner. Since pain, discomfort, and excessive fear compromise the pet’s welfare, the minimum level of intensity required to achieve the desired outcome should be used and they should immediately be stopped if they cause excessive fear. However, before any of these devices are considered as a means of deterring undesirable behavior, you must first focus on: (1) how to train and reinforce alternative desirable behaviors; (2) how to cease rewarding undesirable behaviors; and (3) how to prevent rather than punish. Since positive punishment causes a decrease in behavior by making the pet fearful of repeating the behavior, punishment should not be used to “correct” behaviors that are motivated by fear or anxiety. In addition, if any of these products or techniques: (1) are ineffective in interrupting or stopping the undesirable behavior after the first or second attempt; (2) cause undue fear or anxiety; or (3) lead to threats or aggression, they should be immediately discontinued.






Disruptors and punishment devices




Pet-activated devices




1. Outdoor devices. Electronic containment systems can be used to keep dogs within selected boundaries, or away from selected areas. A transmitter wire is buried along the boundary, and a radio transmitter sends a signal that is received by the collar. As the pet approaches, there is first a warning tone, and then activation of a spray collar if the pet does not retreat out of range. Motion-activated alarms and sprays, ultrasonic deterrents, a motion-activated water sprinkler, and pet repellents can keep pets out of selected areas on the property (e.g., gardens) or stray animals off the property.


2. Indoor devices. Devices designed to keep pets away from areas (i.e., avoidance) include indoor electronic containment systems that activate a spray collar as the pet approaches as well as motion-activated sprays and alarms. Alarms and detectors designed for home security may also be effective. You might also find that a pet may avoid an area if you place down less appealing substrates (e.g., aluminum foil, plastic, or rubber mats) or uncomfortable substrates (e.g., upside-down vinyl carpet runners, double-sided tape) or spray the area with a pet repellent or chew deterrents such as hot sauces, menthol, oil of eucalyptus, cayenne pepper, or commercially available antichew sprays. Some pets, especially cats, may avoid areas with strong perfumes or citrus odors.


3. Dog and cat doors have been developed that will only open for the pet wearing the activation collar or “key.” In fact, some can be programmed to be activated by the pet’s microchip. Child safety locks, secure trash bins, barricades, and crates or dog pens can be used to prevent and avoid problems.


4. Bark deterrents: for a bark-activated device to be effective, it must immediately interrupt the barking, be sensitive enough to detect each undesirable vocalization, and specific enough that it is not activated by extraneous stimuli. Bark-activated, audible, and ultrasonic devices can be placed in areas where the pet might bark (window, front hall, cage). Bark-activated collars that deliver a spray of air or citronella can be worn by the dog at times it might bark. There are also ultrasonic and audible deterrent bark collars but these seldom appear to be effective. Bark-activated products should only be applied if they effectively stop the barking and the owner is present to reward the quiet behaviors that precede and follow barking. Vocalization that is due to anxiety (e.g., storm phobia, separation anxiety) should not be suppressed by a bark collar since, even if effective at reducing barking, it will likely increase, not decrease, the pet’s anxiety.



Shock and discomfort


Most pets quickly learn to avoid situations or locations that cause fear or discomfort. To this end some training devices use varying levels of discomfort or shock. These products fall into the categories of electronic avoidance devices, including outdoor wiring and transmitters that activate a “shock” collar, intended to keep pets within the boundaries of a property; indoor transmitters that activate a shock collar, intended to keep pets out of selected areas of the home; mats that produce a static electric type of stimulation that are designed to sit on counters, furniture, windowsills or around plants; and collars that emit shock when a dog barks. In addition there are remote-activated shock collars that have even greater potential for misuse and abuse since they are activated by humans and not the behavior itself. On a similar note, collars with prongs also act by causing discomfort and pain. Shock devices are considered inhumane and are illegal to use in many countries, but are still widely available in North America.


One argument for the use of these products is that when all other practical solutions have been exhausted, and less intense deterrents have been ineffective, these products offer an alternative that may quickly and effectively resolve problems by teaching the pet to avoid an area or cease a behavior. Therefore, their use might be limited to situations where safety is a factor (to people, other pets, or the pet itself), the problem might otherwise lead to relinquishment (e.g., a barking dog in a high-rise apartment), and to allow dogs the freedom to run free on a large unfenced property. However, in reality most of these problems can be prevented, managed, or improved without the need for undue pain or discomfort. In addition, since these products deter behaviors by causing fear and pain, they can condition new fear responses and further intensify underlying fear and anxiety, leading to emotional issues for the pet and the development of new behavior problems (e.g., defensive or redirected aggression or intense avoidance responses). At the other extreme, despite the level of discomfort, many pets will not be deterred and will continue to bark with a shock collar or run off the property with electronic fencing. Other concerns specific to electronic fencing are that it does not keep people or other animals off the dog’s property and that if the dog escapes the property it will get shocked if it tries to return. Therefore, since the use of any product that causes pain, discomfort, or fear compromises the pet’s welfare, their use cannot be condoned except to consider whether there is any justification for their use if they might spare a pet from relinquishment.


Where the products are legal, practitioners should advise clients of the potential harm these products might cause to the pet and its welfare, and provide alternative options that might effectively address the clients’ concerns. Under no circumstances, however, is there any need to resort to these products for dog training.



Modify the pet’s behavior with psychoactive drugs, pheromones, and alternative remedies


Although medications can be used for a wide variety of behavioral applications, very few have been labeled for the applications in which they are being used (see Chapter 8). Synthetic pheromones and other complementary therapeutics have been less rigorously tested but data are emerging on the possible efficacy of some of these products in the treatment of urine marking and scratching in cats, and as adjunctive treatment for anxiety disorders in dogs and cats (see Chapter 9).




Behavioral modification techniques and terms


While environmental modification, drugs, pheromones, supplements, diet, behavior products, and surgery may all be useful in the treatment of behavior problems, the pet’s behavior will also need to be modified through proper application of learning principles and training techniques. The behavior modification techniques discussed below are utilized throughout the text to treat a variety of behavior problems.




Avoidance and escape


In avoidance conditioning the animal learns to avoid the aversive stimulus, while in escape conditioning the correct response terminates an aversive stimulus. To be effective, the stimulus must be of sufficient intensity to produce the desired response. Timing is the critical element. If the aversive stimulus is applied as soon as the behavior begins, the pet can learn that escape terminates the stimulus. On the other hand, if the aversive stimulus is immediately preceded by a brief neutral (warning) stimulus (e.g., a buzzer, tone), the animal may learn to avoid the neutral stimulus (signaled avoidance). Avoidance learning depends on both classical conditioning of fear (warning stimulus plus aversive stimulus) and negative reinforcement since escape terminates the event.


Motion detector alarms and noxious tastes and odors can be used to teach animals to avoid particular objects or areas. A dog that jumps off a couch to avoid a spray device is escaping from the aversive stimulus itself. However, if an unpleasant event (taste, alarm, spray) is paired with a warning stimulus (tag odor such as vinegar, visual cue such as a warning flag, or audible cue such as a neutral tone), the pet can learn to avoid objects that are paired with the warning stimulus without having to experience the unpleasant event repeatedly. It is interesting to note that, although early in avoidance training the warning sound or odor will provoke fear, when the pet learns how to avoid the outcome, anxiety generally diminishes (since the situation becomes predictable and under the pet’s control).


Avoidance conditioning is most likely to be successful when the desired response to the fear-evoking stimulus is compatible with the animal’s expected defensive or survival reaction (fight, flight, or freeze). The response of a dog or cat is likely to differ from the reaction of a pigeon or a hedgehog. These instinctive responses, which are often referred to as species-specific defensive reactions, are related to the species, the stimulus, and the environment. Behaviors that are compatible with the animal’s innate defensive reactions are learned most quickly. In practice, most applications for avoidance involve training the pet to avoid or retreat from an object (couch, garbage can) or an area of the home (windowsill, dining room). However, attacking the fear-eliciting stimulus might be displayed, especially if the strategy can successfully remove the stimulus, which is why human intervention in punishment should be avoided.



Classical conditioning


This type of learning begins with an unconditioned stimulus that elicits a reflex behavior called an unconditioned response. A neutral stimulus that has no influence on the reflex is repeatedly paired (just prior to the unconditioned stimulus) until it becomes a conditioned stimulus that is able to elicit the response by itself. The response to a conditioned stimulus is referred to as a conditioned response.


This type of conditioning is also known as pavlovian conditioning, after the scientist who conditioned dogs to salivate when they heard a bell. Salivation is a reflex response (unconditioned response) to the stimulus of food (unconditioned stimulus). Pavlov conditioned the response by repeatedly ringing the bell (neutral stimulus) just as the dogs were about to be fed. In time, they began to salivate whenever they heard the bell, even when no food was present. At that point, the sound of the bell became a conditioned stimulus which triggered salivation (conditioned response). The experiment is duplicated daily in many households whenever a pet hears the sound of a can opener or the food cupboard being opened. Similarly, the dog may become either excited or anxious each time the doorbell rings (depending on what association has been made) or may become anxious when taken in the car, or on arriving in the parking lot of a veterinary clinic (if there have been previous unpleasant experiences). Dogs with separation anxiety will soon identify cues that are predictive of being separated from the owner (e.g., getting car keys, picking up a purse), and these become conditioned stimuli for anxiety. Dogs fearful of thunder may begin to appear anxious with the onset of darkening sky, rain, lightning, or perhaps even a drop in barometric pressure. An inhibitory conditioned stimulus is a stimulus that is predictive of the absence of the unconditioned stimulus. Using a clinical example, if a neutral stimulus such as music, tag odor, or piece of owner clothing is associated with reward training and relaxation exercises, then this formerly neutral stimulus becomes both pleasant and predictive of the owner being at home (an absence of owner departures). Therefore, counterconditioning to anxiety-evoking stimuli as well as developing a set of inhibitory stimuli can be valuable retraining tools in separation anxiety.


Classical conditioning can be used to enhance training by creating conditioned stimuli for rewards and conditioned punishments.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in SMALL ANIMAL | Comments Off on Treatment – behavior modification techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access