Diagnosis and Management of Sacroiliac Joint Injuries

Chapter 51Diagnosis and Management of Sacroiliac Joint Injuries

Anatomical and Functional Features

The sacroiliac joint is a synovial articulation located at the junction between the ventral aspect of the wing of the ilium and the dorsal aspect of the wing of the sacrum (Figure 51-1). The sacroiliac joint functions in pelvic attachment to the axial skeleton, providing support during weight bearing and helping to transfer propulsive forces of the hindlimb to the vertebral column. The sacroiliac joint is an atypical synovial articulation because of hyaline cartilage on the sacral articular surface and a thin layer of fibrocartilage on the ilial articular surface.1 The articular surfaces of the sacroiliac joint are nearly flat and closely apposed to support gliding movements. The sacroiliac articular surfaces diverge cranially at about 40 degrees from a transverse plane and are angled craniodorsally to caudoventrally at about 60 degrees from the horizontal plane. The joint capsule is thin and closely follows the margins of the sacroiliac articular cartilage. The sacroiliac joint capsule is reinforced ventrally by the ventral sacroiliac ligament.2 A small amount (<1 mL) of synovial fluid is normally present in the joint.1 Because of articular surface remodeling, the size and shape of the sacroiliac joint margins vary considerably according to age and body weight.3 Typically the sacroiliac joint outline is L-shaped, with the convex border directed caudoventrally.

The pelvis is firmly attached to the axial skeleton by sacroiliac and sacrosciatic ligaments, which form a strong ligamentous sling (see Figure 51-1). The weight of the caudal aspect of the vertebral column is suspended from the sacroiliac ligaments, which function similarly to the fibromuscular sling found between the proximal aspect of the forelimb and the lateral thoracic body wall. Subsequently the sacroiliac articular cartilage may never be fully weight bearing, unlike most articular cartilage. The sacroiliac joint is supported by three pairs of strong ligaments: the dorsal, interosseous, and ventral sacroiliac ligaments. The dorsal sacroiliac ligament consists of dorsal and lateral portions (Figure 51-2). The dorsal portions form two round cords that span from the dorsal aspects of the tubera sacrale to the dorsal apices of the sacral spinous processes. The lateral portion forms a sheet of connective tissue that spans from the caudal margin of each tuber sacrale and iliac wing to the lateral border of the sacrum. The lateral portion of the sacroiliac ligament is continuous ventrally with the sacrosciatic ligament. The interosseous ligament of the sacroiliac joint is robust and consists of a series of vertical fibers that connect the ventral aspect of the wing of the ilium to the dorsal aspect of the wing of the sacrum (see Figure 51-1). The interosseous sacroiliac ligament provides the major resistance to vertically oriented weight-bearing forces acting on the sacrum. The ventral sacroiliac ligament interconnects the ventral aspects of the wings of the ilium and sacrum. The ventral sacroiliac ligament is thin and closely applied to the ventral margins of the sacroiliac joint capsule.

Neurovascular structures adjacent to the sacroiliac joint include the sciatic nerve, cranial gluteal nerve, and cranial gluteal artery and vein. These structures collectively travel through the greater sciatic foramen, ventromedial to the sacroiliac articulation (see Figure 51-2). The cranial gluteal artery and vein arise from the internal iliac vessels and travel over the ventral sacroiliac ligament and the caudomedial aspect of the sacroiliac joint before emerging at the greater sciatic foramen. The cranial gluteal artery and vein continue dorsally into the gluteal musculature. The middle and accessory gluteal muscles originate from the dorsal aspect of the ilial wing and have attachments near the caudomedial aspect of the sacroiliac joint. Within the pelvic canal, a portion of the internal obturator and iliacus muscles covers the ventral sacroiliac joint margins.

The robust sacroiliac and sacrosciatic ligaments limit motion at the sacroiliac articulations.4 Shear forces would be expected at the sacroiliac articular surfaces more than compressive forces, which are common in most limb articulations.5 Sacroiliac joint movements are restricted to small amounts of approximately 1 degree during flexion (nutation) and extension (counternutation), with an apparent axis of rotation oriented transversely near the caudomedial aspect of the joint.6,7 As a result of coupled sacroiliac joint motion of flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation combined with concurrent pelvic deformation, motion at the sacroiliac joints is complex.8 Lateral movements at the sacroiliac articulations are severely restricted, primarily because of lateral attachments of the ventral sacroiliac ligaments and, to a lesser degree, the lateral portion of the dorsal sacroiliac ligaments and the sacrosciatic ligaments. The wings of the ilium overlay the sacral articular surfaces dorsally and laterally, which precludes any axial rotation from occurring at the sacroiliac joint. Dorsal displacement of the ilial wings is limited by the robust interosseous ligament, the ventral sacroiliac ligament, and lateral portion of the dorsal sacroiliac ligaments.9 Propulsive forces of the hindlimb are transmitted dorsally and cranially to the vertebral column by the articular configuration of the overlapping and divergent ilial wings over the sacrum and by reinforcement from the dorsal and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The dorsal sacroiliac ligament also provides resistance against contraction of the powerful longissimus muscle and robust thoracolumbar fascia, which attach along the cranial border of the ilial wing.

Pathological Conditions

The antemortem diagnosis of sacroiliac joint injury in horses is difficult and often based on a diagnosis of exclusion.10 Diagnosis is complicated by anatomical inaccessibility, mild chronic clinical signs so that opportunities for correlation with necropsy findings are uncommon, and ongoing controversies over the clinical relevance and prevalence of pathological conditions of the articular surface and ligaments.4 Terms used to describe pathological conditions of the sacroiliac joint include sacroiliac sprain or instability,11,12 sacroiliac joint subluxation,13 and sacroiliac arthrosis.14,15 The prevalence of pathological conditions of the sacroiliac joint in performance horses is probably high, and many may go undiagnosed.4,14,16 In a necropsy survey of 36 Thoroughbred (TB) racehorses with no known back or sacroiliac joint problems, we observed various degrees of degenerative sacroiliac joint changes in all specimens.17 The clinical importance of osseous sacroiliac joint pathological conditions is difficult to determine because many presumed normal horses have osteoarthritic changes similar to horses with known back or sacroiliac problems.1,4 Possibly the majority of sacroiliac joint pathological conditions are subclinical; however, if similar findings were noted in any other musculoskeletal location, the articular changes would be considered clinically relevant and a likely contributing cause of lameness. A more likely scenario is that deep sclerotogenous pain (e.g., vertebral or sacroiliac joint osteoarthritis [OA]) is often poorly localized and perceived as deep aching pain, based on reports of similar pathological conditions of the sacroiliac joint in affected people. Clinically the most common reported signs of sacroiliac joint disorders in horses are poor performance, lack of impulsion, and a mild, chronic hindlimb lameness, which can easily be overlooked or dismissed as not clinically relevant.4,18 Obvious signs of lameness and localized pain or inflammation are not typical clinical characteristics of sacroiliac joint or pelvic injuries, unless pelvic fractures or substantial joint disruption is present.

OA of the sacroiliac joints is usually a bilateral condition and may be present despite symmetry of the tubera sacrale.19 Degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint include (in apparent order of increasing severity) articular surface lipping, cortical buttressing, articular recession, osteophytes, and intraarticular erosions (Figure 51-3). In our survey of 36 TB racehorses, sacroiliac degenerative changes were classified as mild in 8% of specimens, moderate in 61%, and severe in 31%. Age was not associated with overall prevalence or severity of sacroiliac joint degenerative changes.17 Osseous changes are usually bilaterally symmetrical and most commonly located at the caudomedial aspect of the articulation.1,17 The pathogenesis of proliferative sacroiliac joint changes is uncertain, but it is thought to be related to chronic instability resulting in gradual remodeling and subsequent enlargement of the caudomedial joint surfaces. Histologically the caudomedial extensions consist of apparently normal cancellous bone.4 Articular cartilage erosion is a lytic process of articular surfaces that presumably leads to eventual sacroiliac joint ankylosis.17 However, ankylosis of the sacroiliac joint is rare, which is surprising based on the limited joint motion and the potential severity of osseous pathological conditions present.1,17,20 Fibrous interconnections between the articular surfaces have also been reported in presumed normal sacroiliac joints.1 Articular cartilage discoloration, a presumed indicator of sacroiliac joint degeneration, is common in racehorses, but it has a reported higher prevalence in Standardbreds (STBs) compared with TBs.14 One theory is that these changes are caused by differences in pelvic and sacroiliac joint biomechanics associated with pacing and trotting (i.e., lateral bending or shear forces) in STBs compared with galloping (i.e., flexion and extension movements) in TBs.21 Biomechanical studies are warranted to support or refute these claims.

Sacroiliac desmitis, the most common soft tissue injury, was documented by ultrasonography in the dorsal portion of the dorsal sacroiliac ligament.22 A diagnosis of sacroiliac desmitis is based on loss of normal echogenicity on a transverse image and a decrease in parallel fiber pattern on a longitudinal image. Sacroiliac ligament injuries usually occur because of acute trauma, but few horses with documented injury were reported.17,23

Complete sacroiliac ligament disruption is most likely caused by substantial trauma, such as flipping over backward, or catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries associated with race training.17 Post mortem findings associated with traumatic sacroiliac ligament injuries include either unilateral or bilateral joint capsule disruption, avulsion fractures of the sacroiliac ligament attachment sites, and noticeable sacroiliac joint laxity. Dorsal or ventral sacroiliac ligaments can be affected, depending on the inciting mechanism of injury.9,17,23 Complete sacroiliac ligament disruption may produce unilateral or bilateral dorsal displacement of the tubera sacrale, depending on the extent of injury (Figure 51-4).

Acute sacroiliac ligament injuries have been reported to contribute to development of chronic sacroiliac joint instability.11,23 However, the presence and relevance of chronic sacroiliac ligament injury and sacroiliac joint laxity are controversial. Rooney et al23,24 documented chronic sacroiliac joint injuries of the cranial portion of the ventral sacroiliac ligaments, which were found to be elongated or torn on the affected side. Desmitis of the insertion site of the dorsal portion of the dorsal sacroiliac ligament at the insertion on the tuber sacrale was reported.9 In other studies osseous changes were found at the caudomedial sacroiliac joint margins in horses suspected of having chronic sacroiliac injury; however, no obvious sacroiliac ligament laxity was observed.4,11,12 Radiologically some of these horses had an apparent increase in the sacroiliac joint space; however, no visible sacroiliac ligament injury, joint laxity, or subluxation was observed at necropsy.4,12 In our necropsy survey of 36 TB racehorses, no evidence of chronic ligament injury or sacroiliac joint subluxation was observed.17 However, this could be related to the previous removal of horses from race training with poor performance or hindlimb lameness associated with chronic sacroiliac joint injury.

The pathogenesis of apparent spontaneous or insidious differences in tuber sacrale height needs to be further researched.4 Unilateral or bilateral dorsal displacement of the tubera sacrale is often a presumed indication of sacroiliac subluxation.25 In my opinion, variable degrees of tubera sacrale height asymmetry occur frequently and may be caused by chronic asymmetric muscular or ligamentous forces acting on the malleable osseous pelvis and not by direct sacroiliac ligament injury.26 Tubera sacrale height asymmetries are common in horses without documented sacroiliac joint injuries (see Figure 51-4). In only a few horses have tubera sacrale height asymmetries been associated with chronic sacroiliac ligament injuries or joint laxity.24 In a study of 4-year-old STB trotters with tubera sacrale height asymmetries of more than 1 cm, associations were found with poor performance, but otherwise the asymmetry was of questionable clinical importance.16 If substantial tubera sacrale height differences are identified, which side is affected is unclear and difficult to determine: the seemingly dorsally displaced tuber sacrale or the less prominent tuber sacrale on the opposite side.4,16 Presumed sacroiliac joint subluxation produces an elevated tuber sacrale on the affected side, whereas complete ilial wing fractures (the most common type of pelvic fracture) typically produce a palpably depressed tuber sacrale on the affected side.27

Jun 4, 2016 | Posted by in EQUINE MEDICINE | Comments Off on Diagnosis and Management of Sacroiliac Joint Injuries
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes