Cardiac Blood Tests

CHAPTER 38 Cardiac Blood Tests




The assessment of feline cardiac function relies traditionally on electrocardiography, radiography, and echocardiography. These diagnostic modalities are relatively time-consuming, expensive, and in the case of echocardiography, may be of limited availability. Blood-based cardiac testing is an emerging field offering important advantages over traditional diagnostic tests, including lower financial cost and wide availability. The clinical utility of blood-based testing relies on the specificity and sensitivity of the assay to detect underlying heart disease and provide information regarding disease severity, response to treatment, and prognosis. Sensitivity refers to the ability of a test to detect affected individuals, whereas specificity refers to the ability to detect individuals not affected by the condition in question. A clinical test that yields a yes or no (binary) result represents a conflicting balance between sensitivity and specificity. That is, gains in sensitivity typically are offset by losses of specificity and vice versa. Tests that yield continuous (e.g., numerical) results can provide additional information regarding severity of the disease (i.e., higher assay values signify more severe disease), allow risk stratification and prognostication, as well as the ability to guide therapy.


Cardiac blood testing is widely accepted in human medicine. In fact, blood-based detection of cardiac “biomarkers” represents the diagnostic standard for detection of acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure.1,2 A biomarker is defined as a substance elaborated by a specific tissue, detected in circulation, released in proportion to a particular disease process that provides information regarding presence and severity of disease, and is relatively stable and easy to detect by routine clinical laboratory methods. Detection of biomarkers for disease of organs other than the heart is both familiar and routine. For example, bilirubin is a commonly used biomarker to detect hepatic disease. In cats B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and cardiac troponin have demonstrated the greatest potential as cardiac biomarkers.




DETECTION OF UNDERLYING HEART DISEASE


Circulating concentrations of C-ANP and C-BNP are elevated in cats with heart disease,8 and plasma C-ANP concentrations correlate strongly with left atrial pressure in cats.9 NT-proANP and NT-proBNP are similarly elevated in affected cats.10 Median (95% CI) concentration of NT-proANP in healthy control cats, cats with heart disease without heart failure, and cats with heart disease and heart failure was 682 (530 to 834) pmol/L, 1176 (810 to 1543) pmol/L, and 1865 (1499 to 2231) pmol/L, respectively.10 Using a cutoff value of 960 pmol/L, NT-proANP assay possessed a sensitivity of 84 per cent and specificity of 82 per cent in distinguishing healthy controls from cats with heart disease or heart failure. Overall, NT-proANP assay classified 83 per cent of the 78 cats correctly in the study. In the same study10 median (95% CI) concentration of NT-proBNP in healthy control cats, cats with heart disease without heart failure, and cats with heart disease and heart failure was 34 (11 to 56) pmol/L, 184 (111 to 257) pmol/L, and 525 (437 to 612) pmol/L, respectively. Using a cutoff value of 49 pmol/L, NT-proBNP assay possessed 100 per cent sensitivity and 89 per cent specificity, and 96 per cent of all cats were classified correctly. Thus every cat with heart disease or heart failure (n = 50) was detected by NT-proBNP assay. The detection of heart disease in cats using NT-proBNP assay is further supported by a study of 80 healthy control cats and 86 cats with asymptomatic heart disease.11 In this population an NT-proBNP cutoff value of 40 pmol/L yielded 90 per cent sensitivity and 85 per cent specificity for detecting cats with asymptomatic heart disease. These results indicate that detection of asymptomatic or occult cardiomyopathy is possible using natriuretic peptide assay, and in particular NT-proBNP assay. Cats with preclinical cardiomyopathy are a particularly important subpopulation, because by definition they demonstrate no clinical signs referable to their underlying disease. Cats with preclinical disease frequently escape detection until overt sequelae (i.e., pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, systemic thromboembolism) develop, at which time prognosis is very poor.


In general, screening tests are most useful when the assay in use is highly sensitive and is applied to a high-risk population with a relatively high prevalence of disease.12 In a feline population this may include breeds at high risk (e.g., Maine Coon), older cats, or cats with heart murmurs or gallop rhythms. This combination of high sensitivity and relatively high prevalence maximizes the predictive power of the test by reducing the number of false-positive and false-negative results.



ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE SEVERITY


In cats with cardiomyopathy, circulating NT-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations correlate with traditional indices of disease severity, such as vertebral heart size, left ventricular wall thickness, and left atrial size.10,13 These results agree with findings in human beings with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).14,15 It should be noted, however, that the precise clinical utility of circulating BNP concentrations for quantification of disease severity in any individual patient is still a subject of great debate.16,17 Importantly NT-proBNP may not detect very early and mild disease (i.e., a false-negative result). More studies in this specific population are needed. The importance of detecting very early disease can be viewed in different ways. On the one hand, a false-negative result would allow a cat with mild disease to remain undetected, and this may negatively impact breeding decisions made for animals young enough to still be bred. In this regard identification and screening for specific causative genetic mutations remains the gold standard (see Chapter 39). On the other hand, proponents of cardiac blood testing argue that the impact of a false-negative result on any individual animal outside of breeding considerations is relatively low, such that very mild disease is not typically associated with clinical signs, nor are there proven medical interventions that alter the course of disease at this early stage. Thus no practical intervention other than rechecking disease at a later date is typically performed in cats with very mild disease. Based on previous studies indicating a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in cats with moderate to severe disease,10,11,13 one could reasonably expect that serial NT-proBNP assay in these cats could be used to detect progressive disease.



DETECTING HEART FAILURE IN THE CAT WITH RESPIRATORY SIGNS


In cats with respiratory signs BNP assay helps to differentiate causes of dyspnea. In a study of 137 cats who presented with respiratory signs, plasma NT-proBNP higher than 265 pmol/L yielded a sensitivity of 91 per cent and specificity of 85 per cent in detecting those cats with heart failure (n = 84) versus those with primary respiratory diseases such as asthma, pneumonia, or neoplasia (n = 53).13 Similarly, Connolly et al10 reported that NT-proBNP higher than 220 pmol/L possessed 94 per cent sensitivity and 88 per cent specificity, whereas NT-proANP higher than 986 pmol/L possessed 94 per cent sensitivity and 80 per cent specificity, in 41 cats with respiratory disease and 33 cats with heart failure. Finally Wess et al18 reported that NT-proBNP higher than 277 pmol/L achieved 95 per cent sensitivity and 85 per cent specificity in 21 cats with respiratory disease and 20 cats with heart failure. Thus the cumulative results of these studies suggest that NT-proANP, and in particular, NT-proBNP, are useful as part of the diagnostic evaluation of cats who present with respiratory signs. Those cats with elevated NT-proBNP concentrations likely suffer from congestive heart failure, whereas those with lower values are more likely to have primary respiratory disease. The value of such testing is especially pertinent to patients who are not stable enough for routine diagnostic tests (e.g., thoracic radiography, echocardiography, transtracheal wash). The development of rapid pet-side assays is needed to fulfill the potential of these tests maximally for use in the emergent patient.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 6, 2016 | Posted by in INTERNAL MEDICINE | Comments Off on Cardiac Blood Tests

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access