Bedside Laboratory and Microbiologic Procedures

Chapter 67


Bedside Laboratory and Microbiologic Procedures




Assessment of Urine



Obtaining a Urine Specimen


Several methods are available for obtaining a urine specimen. They can be found in Table 67-1 and are listed in order of increasingly precise collection techniques, which comes at the cost of increasing difficulty, patient discomfort, or both.




General Considerations regarding Urine Collection


The advantages and disadvantages of each of the techniques listed in Table 67-1 can be determined only by the purpose of the urine test and the clinical context. The clinical context influences interpretation of the results. For the great majority of clinical scenarios, the basic dichotomy is between specimens obtained for infectious versus noninfectious reasons. With the exception of testing for red blood cells (RBCs) and white blood cells (WBCs), most of the noninfectious tests (e.g., ketones, glucose, bilirubin, protein) are not affected by the collection method. Urine specimens collected to diagnose infection can be contaminated in a number of ways, and the choice and interpretation of tests are intricately influenced by the clinical scenario.


Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are either symptomatic or asymptomatic, and the symptoms determine which collection method is required (Fig. 67-1). With symptomatic UTI, extremely low levels of bacteriuria (102 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL) and pyuria are of clinical significance.1,2 This may be obscured in some clinicians’ minds by an alternative, more widely promulgated fact: in asymptomatic patients the threshold for “significant bacteriuria” is 1000-fold higher at greater than 105 CFUs/mL.3,4 Symptomatic patients constitute a clinically distinct group who require a urine test that is much more sensitive and thus will render a false-positive result with much lower levels of contaminants. Although many studies do not show a statistically significant increase in contamination rates with less stringent urine collection techniques, most show increased accuracy with more meticulous or invasive collection methods.5–8 Because it takes only marginally longer, it makes sense to always strive for the highest-quality urine specimen available, especially in view of the delays, repeated testing, and additional cost entailed by false-positive results. A frequent misconception is that contaminated specimens are characterized by the isolation of multiple pathogens, but in fact, up to 50% of symptomatic women may have polymicrobial infections.1,9



The issue of whether a patient is “symptomatic” might appear trivial, but the clinical practice of checking for UTI in most patients with any type of abdominal pain has important implications. Studies of urine collection and testing in symptomatic patients focus on the classic signs and symptoms of UTI (e.g., urgency, frequency, dysuria, flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness) and do not include patients with nonspecific abdominal pain. Whether undifferentiated abdominal pain or fever constitutes a “symptom” of UTI has never been studied, and how to apply the results of studies done on patients with classic symptoms to those with nonspecific symptoms is unclear.10 Patients with classic symptoms need the most careful urine collection method because they have the most riding on the outcome of the test. This group of patients should include those with systemic signs of infection (e.g., fever and chills) who are unable to accurately report their symptoms and patients in whom failure to diagnose asymptomatic bacteriuria would be potentially dangerous (e.g., the immunocompromised, neonates and infants, pregnant patients, diabetics) or for whom urine cultures are going to be necessary because of a history of relapsing, recurrent, complicated, or childhood UTI.9,11


In cooperative, motivated males and females with symptoms of uncomplicated lower UTI or pyelonephritis who are capable of diligently performing the necessary maneuvers, a midstream clean-catch (MSCC) specimen is as accurate as a catheterized specimen, especially when the possibility of urethral or prostatic trauma and patient discomfort are considered.12 In patients unable to provide an MSCC specimen, a catheterized specimen is usually warranted.


If no symptoms of UTI are present, the urine examination can be considered a “screening” test. In asymptomatic patients, routine screening for bacteriuria is unwarranted in all but two clinical situations: pregnant women and all patients scheduled for urologic surgery.13,14 If only a urine culture is to be performed, some would argue that any spontaneously voided specimen would suffice since the diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria depends on 105 or more CFUs of a single pathogen per milliliter of urine. With such criteria, contaminants are usually easily identified.8 Because performing cultures on all such patients is prohibitively costly, dipstick testing, urinalysis (UA), or both are commonly used for screening.15,16 With these tests, contamination by bacteria, leukocytes, or erythrocytes results in diagnostic confusion. The advantages of a less contaminated specimen are worth the minimal, extra effort of asking the patient to provide an MSCC sample. The approach in Figure 67-1 covers the vast majority of situations. A few circumstances and techniques deserve special mention.



Bladder Percussion and the Midstream Specimen in Infants


The emergency clinician is familiar with how frequently a urine stream is generated in infants confronted by the alarming emergency department (ED) environment and a cold stethoscope. Rather than wasting a potentially perfect MSCC specimen on a laboratory coat with an ensuing delay in obtaining urine, the clinician can exploit the situation by approaching an infant with an open sterile urine container in hand in case the urine stream is spontaneously forthcoming. The process is facilitated by the application of cold povidone-iodine to the genitalia. Such an approach has been shown to generate a urine sample in a median time of 10 minutes.17 This is less than the typical time needed for straight catheterization or suprapubic aspiration (SPA), and it can be performed concomitantly with the history and physical examination and thereby circumvent an invasive procedure. If the urine specimen is not immediately forthcoming, a parent can be equipped with a sterile container and be instructed on collection of an ensuing specimen to free up ED staff for other tasks. Two techniques to actively induce voiding in infants have been described. The first, which is useful in newborns, exploits the Perez reflex.18 After cleansing the genitalia, hold the infant in one hand while stroking the paraspinal muscles in a cephalad to caudad direction. This causes extension of the back and flexion of the hips and induces micturition in less than 5 minutes in the majority of cases.18 The second technique is known as “bladder tapping.” After urethral cleansing, if there is still no urine, use two fingers to tap on the suprapubic area at a rate of approximately once per second for a full minute, followed by a minute’s rest. Repeat the cycle until urine is produced. The mean time before the production of a urine sample is about 5 minutes. This technique, though not practicable for the staff in a busy ED, can provide an infant’s parents with a task that invests them in the clinical process. This clinical pearl may expeditiously furnish a specimen with significantly less investment of staff time than required for more invasive techniques.19



Bag Collection in Non–Toilet-Trained Children


The incidence of unsuspected UTI in a febrile neonate or infant is about 5%.20 A true UTI in an infant or child requires subsequent evaluation for urinary tract pathology, and the disease may produce significant morbidity (e.g., hypertension, renal disease). One must be certain of the presence or absence of infection in this subgroup. Numerous studies have demonstrated the disutility of urine specimens obtained for culture from a collection bag stuck to an infant’s perineum.18,19,21–23 Bag specimens may be more sensitive than catheter specimens when used for UA or microscopy to identify infection in children at low or moderate risk for UTI.24 In this group it is acceptable to perform screening UA, microscopy, or both on a bag specimen.25,26 If negative, UTI is ruled out. If positive (leukocyte esterase or nitrite present or more than 5 WBCs/high-power field [HPF] on spun urine or bacteria on an unspun Gram-stained specimen), it is followed by catheterization and culture, with treatment usually pending the results of culture.21,25–27 If a urine specimen is needed solely for chemical analysis (e.g., glucose, ketones, specific gravity), a bag specimen will suffice.



Urine Specimens from Patients with Chronic Urinary Drainage Systems


Urine obtained from any part of a chronic urinary drainage system is highly inaccurate for bacteriologic purposes. If UTI is suspected, insert a new catheter and obtain a fresh bladder urine specimen.28 A small study advocating replacement of a chronically applied “Texas sheath” catheter with a fresh one was performed on subjects who did not have symptoms of UTI.29 Such a method might be sufficiently accurate for screening asymptomatic patients, but a Foley catheter should be used to obtain urine from patients with sheath catheters who have signs or symptoms of acute UTI and are unable to provide an MSCC specimen.



Catheterization and SPA


The low levels of bacteriuria found in 2% to 8% of patients after straight catheterization are generally below the threshold that defines the presence of UTI.30 Catheterization can cause minor local injury, as reflected by low-level hematuria in 15% of patients.30,31 SPA continues to be advocated by some for neonates in cases in which accurate diagnosis is essential and the risk for infection must be minimized. Both SPA (see Chapter 55) and catheterization have an approximately 25% “failure rate” as a result of an empty bladder.32 This problem and associated complications can be avoided by performing bedside ultrasound before the procedure.32–34 SPA may spuriously lower leukocyte or bacterial colony counts because of the necessity of filling the bladder before performing the procedure.35 A study in infants demonstrated that the discomfort associated with SPA is greater than that with catheterization.36 Surprisingly, however, older men who underwent both catheterization and SPA strongly preferred SPA.5



Urine Dipstick


Urine dipstick tests are available to test 10 separate parameters. The unassuming appearance and commonplace use of the urine dipstick might lead one to mistakenly underestimate its technical sophistication. Each colored square on a urine dipstick involves a biochemically complex assay, and therefore it is essential to meticulously follow the manufacturer’s instructions for storage and use.37 Even with optimal storage and testing conditions, the false-negative and false-positive rates of these tests are problematic. In addition, most of the tests are susceptible to interference from a variety of substances (Table 67-2).



TABLE 67-2


Overview of Urine Dipstick Tests















































  SOURCES OF ERROR AND ARTIFACT COMMENTS
Glucose False positive with peroxide, hypochlorite, ketonuria, levodopa, and the dipstick exposed to air
False negative with ascorbate, ketones, uric acid, and high specific gravity		 Hypothermia may cause glycosuria despite hypoglycemia
Glycosuria without hyperglycemia suggests renal tubular dysfunction
Ketones False positive with ascorbate, low pH urine, high specific gravity, levodopa, valproate, phenazopyridine, N-acetylcysteine, high-protein diet, phenylketonuria, phthalein compounds Very susceptible to deterioration with humidity and delay in analysis, which can cause false-negative results
Nitrites False positive with phenazopyridine
False negative high specific gravity, frequent urination, ascorbate, high urine pH, and urine standing in the specimen cup >2 hr		 75% false-negative rate when exposed to air for 15 days
Does not detect reductase-negative bacteria
Protein False positive with pH >7 and chlorhexidine
False negative with low pH, very dilute urine		 Only reliable for albumin (glomerular proteinuria)
Does not detect Bence-Jones protein
Positive with pyuria, rarely with hematuria
Blood False positive with povidone-iodine, certain (peroxidase-producing) bacteria, hypochlorite
False negative with high specific gravity and high concentrations of urinary nitrites, ascorbate, or captopril		 Positive test with speckles or dots implies nonhemolyzed blood
Positive test with a diffuse pattern implies hemolyzed red blood cells or high levels of myoglobin
Bilirubin False positive with iodine, stool contamination, chlorpromazine, mefenamic acid
False negative after prolonged standing		 Hard to read with agents causing marked urine discoloration
Urobilinogen False positive with phenazopyridine, sulfisoxazole, sulfonamides, porphyrin, methyldopa, procaine, aminosalicylic acid, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid
False negative with sulfisoxazole and phenazopyridine		 Use a fresh specimen: rapidly broken down by light and in acidic urine
Leukocyte esterase False positive with vaginal contamination, oxidizing agents, eosinophils in urine, Trichomonas
False negative with high glucose, ketones, protein (especially albumin), pH, and specific gravity, as well as with cephalexin, tetracycline, oxalates, ascorbic acid, neutropenia		 Sterile pyuria seen with tuberculosis, nephrolithiasis, interstitial nephritis
pH Urea-splitting bacteria elevate pH
Run off from the protein strip can falsely lower pH		 Use a fresh specimen: standing raises pH by loss of CO2
Specific gravity Overestimates specific gravity with low pH, ketoacidosis, and protein
Underestimates specific gravity with glucose, urea, or pH >7		 Not reliable at specific gravity >1.025
Elevated with use of dextran, intravenous contrast material, proteinuria


Method


Test urine specimens as soon as possible after they are collected. If the urine has been standing, stir or shake the specimen well because cells sink rapidly in a container. Immerse the test strip completely for 1 second or less. Draw the edge of the strip along the rim of the specimen container and lightly tap it to remove excess urine, thus avoiding mixing the reagents between different test patches. Next, hold the strip horizontally or place it on a clean gauze pad until the recommended time has elapsed. Most strips are designed so that all the test results can be read together after 1 to 2 minutes (Fig. 67-2).




Interpretation



Glucose: The urine glucose test is normally negative. Urine glucose testing has limited usefulness in quantitative testing because the serum glucose level at which spillage occurs varies (although in most patients it starts at between 180 and 200 mg/dL).38 Changes in urine glucose lag behind changes in blood glucose by approximately half the interval between voids.39 Glycosuria in the absence of hyperglycemia suggests renal tubular dysfunction. Glycosuria may occur in hypothermic patients in the absence of hyperglycemia and indeed may actually occur with hypoglycemia in such patients.40




Leukocyte Esterase: This portion of the dipstick test is designed to detect enzymes from the azurophilic granules in neutrophils. Normally the test is negative. Studies report a wide and clinically important range of thresholds for the sensitivity of dipstick testing, from 10 to 100 WBCs/µL urine.15,16 Studies suggest that the test is between 50% and 96% sensitive in detecting infection.2,42,43 Its specificity for the presence of WBCs is between 91% and 99%. The most common cause of a false-positive leukocyte test is vaginal contamination.



Nitrites: Normally, urine does not contain nitrites. Nitrites are specific (≈95%), but not sensitive (≈45%) indicators of UTI.13,44,45 Urinary nitrates are converted to nitrites most strongly by enteric coliform bacteria, thus explaining the nitrite test’s 90% sensitivity in detecting UTI caused by Escherichia coli. Enterococcus, a moderately frequent urinary pathogen, Pseudomonas species, and Acinetobacter lack the reductase enzyme and are not detected. False-negative results also occur because of the lack of dietary nitrate, frequent voiding, and diuresis. Early morning–voided specimens are ideal because they allow time for conversion of nitrate to nitrite, but they are rarely available in the ED. If possible, a specimen obtained more than 4 hours after the last voiding is preferred.



Protein: Proteins with a molecular weight below 50,000 to 60,000 daltons can pass through the glomerulus to be reabsorbed in the proximal tubule. Normal passage of protein in urine is less than 150 mg/24 hours, or approximately 10 mg/dL of urine. About 10% to 33% of urinary protein is albumin, 33% is Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (secreted by renal tubular cells), and the balance is made up of a variety of immunoglobulins and other proteins. Proteinuria is a finding noted in about 5% of routine urine screens in men.46 This may represent a normal variant since 3% to 5% of healthy adults have postural proteinuria (proteinuria when standing but not when recumbent).38 Proteinuria is rarely clinically significant unless 3+ or greater on the dipstick, although lower levels are still indicative of some degree of renal dysfunction (see later). The dipstick detects negatively charged proteins more strongly than positively charged ones; it is therefore most sensitive to albumin. A study of ED patients with severe acute hypertension identified renal dysfunction, defined as elevated serum creatinine, with 100% sensitivity when using urine dipstick detection of 1+ proteinuria or hematuria.47 Along similar lines, in patients being considered for radiographic contrast-enhanced studies who do not have a serum creatinine measurement, a negative dipstick test for protein or blood combined with the absence of prior renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and age younger than 60 years effectively excludes renal insufficiency.48 The urine dipstick test is positive for protein with pyuria of greater than 6 WBCs/HPF.49 This is a false-positive finding for protein but is helpful when the urine dipstick is being used to screen for UTI since the threshold for leukocyte esterase is often significantly higher. Hematuria only slightly elevates urine protein levels.


In assessing a patient with proteinuria, it is helpful to divide the list of causes into those that are and those that are not associated with hematuria. These are listed in Box 67-1. Elevated urinary protein is more commonly due to renal than to systemic causes. The source is either glomerular, with passage of normally unfiltered proteins, or tubular, with failure to reabsorb physiologically filtered, low-molecular-weight globulins. The former condition causes albuminuria. Renal tubular proteinuria is characterized by low levels of urinary albumin and is therefore more likely to be missed.



Box 67-1   Some Causes of Proteinuria with and without Hematuria




Proteinuria Usually with Hematuria



Proteinuria Usually Without Hematuria



Infectious Diseases



Multisystem Diseases



Primary Glomerular Diseases


Systemic Conditions



Medications, Drugs, and Toxins



Renal Diseases




“Blood”: The blood section of the urine dipstick is positive if exposed to RBCs, hemoglobin (Hb), or myoglobin. Urine in healthy volunteers contains fewer than 7 RBCs/mL. Studies have shown that the urine dipstick is very sensitive to 10 RBCs/mL. False-negative results are confined to clinically insignificant hematuria.50 The dipstick pad should be inspected for discrete positive “dots,” indicative of nonhemolyzed RBCs. Moderate intravascular hemolysis does not cause hemoglobinuria because Hb is tightly bound to haptoglobin and is therefore not filtered. Massive intravascular hemolysis gives rise to free plasma Hb with a molecular weight of 32,000 daltons, which easily passes through the glomerulus. Myoglobin has a molecular weight of 17,000 daltons, which also allows easy glomerular passage, but the dipstick has been shown to have a sensitivity of only 14% with heat-induced rhabdomyolysis, as reflected by serum creatine phosphokinase levels of up to 1000 U/L.51 Guidelines for distinguishing hematuria, hemoglobinuria, and myoglobinuria are outlined in Table 67-3. In asymptomatic men older than 50 years, significant disease can be signaled by intermittent hematuria, thus mandating follow-up of patients with this incidental finding.52



Dipsticks are vitiated by humidity and air, which can cause false-negative results after improper storage.53 Because RBCs may lyse rapidly, delays in performing UA may misleadingly suggest myoglobinuria or hemoglobinuria. Microscopy or dipstick testing of a freshly obtained specimen can clarify this issue. Conversely, high specific gravity or low pH can inhibit lysis of erythrocytes, which is necessary for the dipstick chemical reaction to occur, thus causing false-negative results.53a A study reproducing clinical conditions has demonstrated that povidone-iodine does not cause false-positive results on the dipstick.53b Iatrogenically caused trace positive results may occur after catheterization in 15% of cases.31




Urobilinogen: In a healthy person, conjugated bilirubin is excreted in bile. In the colon it is broken down into a number of compounds, including urobilinogen. Most of these compounds are excreted in stool, which is the source of its characteristic color. A small amount of urobilinogen is absorbed from the colon, and if it is not taken up on the first pass through the liver, it enters the circulation. Ultimately, some of this urobilinogen may enter the urine, so it is normal to have zero to moderate levels of urinary urobilinogen on dipstick testing. Most diseases that cause hepatocyte dysfunction (hepatitis, cirrhosis, passive liver congestion, etc.) increase urinary urobilinogen excretion by impairing hepatic uptake of urobilinogen. As a qualitative test with a wide range of normal values, it is rarely helpful, but in evaluating a patient with jaundice, it can have diagnostic significance (Table 67-4).




pH: The average daily excretion of 50 to 100 mmol of H+ in urine gives rise to a typical urine pH of around 6 with a range from 4.5 to 8. Dietary protein lowers urinary pH, whereas fruit (especially citrus) and vegetables tend to raise it. The significance of pH testing is in the assessment of normal renal function. In most states of alkalosis and acidosis, healthy kidneys maintain homeostasis by conserving or excreting H+. Failure to do so suggests renal disease, especially renal tubular acidosis. An exception is the “paradoxical aciduria” of hypokalemic alkalosis secondary to volume contraction, hypercorticism, or diuretics, where the highest priority of the renal tubule is to conserve sodium. pH is elevated by the action of urea-splitting bacteria, especially Proteus species. This can occur with “stasis” of urine, either in the bladder or in specimen cups. A persistently alkaline urine is seen in patients with struvite (triple phosphate) urolithiasis.




Microscopic UA


Microscopic UA is performed to identify cells, bacteria, and other microbes, as well as formed elements such as casts and crystals (Fig. 67-3). The following discussion focuses on the findings of significance in diagnosing UTI: WBCs, bacteria, and WBC casts. The presence of WBCs with bacteria distinguishes infection from colonization (bacteriuria without pyuria). Some authorities state that significant infection without pyuria occurs in less than 5% of cases, thus making pyuria alone a sensitive marker of infection.53,55 Other studies do not support reliance on pyuria by itself as an indicator of infection.2,3,5,27 The presence of WBC casts distinguishes pyelonephritis (“upper UTI”) from cystitis (“lower UTI”).



Microscopic UA is performed by one of five methods. Traditionally, the most common technique has been examination of unstained centrifuged urine. It has the advantage of concentrating formed elements that might otherwise be missed. Its disadvantage is that the presence and quantity of elements in a specimen will depend on many uncontrolled factors: the volume of the specimen, the duration and speed of centrifugation, the fragility of the formed elements, the volume of the “drop” in which the pellet is resuspended, and the size of the microscope’s HPF.14,56,57



1. Examination of unspun urine in a hemocytometer counting chamber. A hemocytometer is a precisely milled slide etched with measured squares, which allows exact enumeration of the cells in each square. Because the distance between the etched surface and the coverslip is known exactly, it is possible to determine the number of cells per unit volume of specimen. Enough fresh unspun urine is placed on the slide to fully cover the counting area, and the cells are counted. There should usually be less than 1 WBC/µL, although more than 10 WBCs/µL and more than 5 RBCs/µL are unequivocally abnormal.58 The threshold for diagnosing UTI is usually set at 8 or more WBCs/µL.9,22,56,59,60 Bacteria do not sink to the surface of the hemocytometer, so counting them through the many focal planes of the chamber is not possible, although methods to estimate the bacterial count per unit volume have been described.57


    The hemocytometer is accurate, fast (time need not be spent on staining or centrifugation), and relatively easy to master. Its major drawbacks are cost (around $150 for the slide and cover slip) and fragility (easily destroyed if dropped). These characteristics are problematic given the conditions and resources in many EDs, although their use has been advocated by some.61 Formed elements other than WBCs and RBCs (e.g., casts) occur in such low concentrations that they are encountered in the hemocytometer only by chance, and therefore microscopy of spun urine is needed for their identification.


2. Examination of unspun, unstained urine placed on a regular microscope slide. This qualitative method is sometimes used for the diagnosis of UTI. Using 1 organism/HPF as a positive result, the sensitivity and specificity of detecting 105 CFUs/mL are between 60% and 90%.62 This method identifies only 1 WBC/HPF with the highly pyuric state of 250 WBCs/µL,60 which has led some to advocate the use of more than 1 WBC per low-power field as a criterion for infection.58


3. Examination of unstained, centrifuged urine. With this method, 10 mL of urine is centrifuged at approximately 450g (1000 to 4000 rpm) for 3 to 5 minutes. Roughly 9 mL of supernatant is poured off, and the pellet is resuspended in the remaining fluid. This suspension is placed on a slide with a coverslip and examined. The larger formed elements, especially casts, tend to migrate to the edge of the coverslip, and they can be seen with low magnification. One or two casts, depending on the clinical context, may be normal; more are not. The morphology of the more commonly encountered formed elements of urine sediment is shown in Figure 67-3. The significance of each is beyond the scope of this text, but this information can be found in a standard textbook of clinical laboratory procedures and diagnostic testing.38,39 When examining centrifuged urine, more than 5 WBCs/HPF in the middle of the coverslip has traditionally been taken as being indicative of abnormal pyuria. Most authors have estimated that 10 WBCs/µL is equivalent to approximately 1 WBC/HPF; thus, this oft-cited threshold for diagnosing UTI is actually equivalent to 50 WBCs/µL in unspun urine.56,58,59 Since the gold standard for the diagnosis of UTI is more than 8 WBCs/µL of unspun urine, many infections will escape detection with this method. Various numbers of bacteria per HPF have been used as criteria for the diagnosis of UTI. A threshold of 10 to 20 organisms/HPF has been recommended to rule out bacteriuria at the 105-CFU/mL level.62 As noted previously, this threshold would not exclude infection in symptomatic patients.


4. Examination of Gram-stained, uncentrifuged urine. Also a semiquantitative measurement, it is estimated that 1 bacterium/HPF is equivalent to 105 CFUs/mL in bacterial culture.38,62 A drop of urine is placed on the slide, allowed to air-dry, and then heat-fixed and Gram-stained.


5. Examination of Gram-stained, centrifuged urine. This method is probably the optimal technique, short of culture, for the assessment of bacteriuria. It is more than 95% sensitive and more than 60% specific at 104 CFUs/mL—an order of magnitude lower concentration of bacteriuria than the previously described methods.63 Detection of 1 organism per oil-immersion field constitutes a positive result. Specificity is increased to 95% if 5 organisms/HPF are seen.62



Summary of Tests Used in the Diagnosis of UTI


The three tests commonly used to evaluate a patient for the presence or absence of UTI are urine dipstick, microscopic UA, and urine culture. Each represents an increasing degree of expense, delay, and resources.64 A brief discussion of their relative strengths and weaknesses ensues.



Urine Dipstick


Dipstick testing of urine is faster than microscopic UA, is less labor-intensive and cheaper, and circumvents multiple sources of potential and proven error. Is it sufficiently accurate to replace UA, however? If either leukocyte esterase or nitrites are used to indicate infection, the dipstick is only 50% to 90% sensitive for culture-proven infection.15,43,44,63,65 This is not adequate to rule out infection in symptomatic patients, in whom the prevalence of disease is high, but may be acceptable in asymptomatic patients, in whom the test has a serviceably high negative predictive value of 95% to 99%. In symptomatic men, sensitivity is enhanced by taking a positive result in any one (or more) of either leukocyte esterase, nitrites, protein, or blood as an indication of UTI.15,66–68 This process can be augmented by allowing extra time before reading the strip. For women with symptoms of UTI, empirical treatment is recommended because no test can rule out infection.64 A negative dipstick test in a patient with a high pretest probability of UTI should prompt a search for an alternative source of the patient’s symptoms. Maneuvers to enhance dipstick sensitivity diminish its specificity, which may be as low as 26%.10 This has led some to advocate microscopic UA on all urine specimens that are found to be abnormal by dipstick,67 but this probably adds little to a carefully performed dipstick test.



Microscopic UA


If the urine dipstick has such poor specificity when it is used as a test with adequate sensitivity, should it be discarded altogether and microscopic UA be relied on instead? Apart from the hemocytometer, the most reliable method for identifying significant bacteriuria is oil-immersion microscopy of Gram-stained, centrifuged urine.62 Nonetheless, the practice in most hospital laboratories is to examine a resuspended pellet of unstained, centrifuged urine. The problems with this method have been discussed. In various studies a range between 1 and 10 organisms/HPF or 5 WBCs/HPF has been considered a “positive” test (as the threshold number rises, so does specificity, at the price of sensitivity). In aggregate, the accuracy of microscopy in the diagnosis of UTI is similar to that of the dipstick alone, with 22% false-positive and 23% false-negative rates when compared with culture.53,57,64 Microscopic UA, like the dipstick, cannot rule out infection in symptomatic patients. The specificity of pyuria will be improved when viewed as a marker of all genitourinary infections, including urethritis, prostatitis, epididymitis, vaginitis, and cervicitis. These diagnoses should always be entertained in patients with urinary symptoms, especially those with sterile pyuria.




The Bottom Line


It is well established that female patients with symptoms of uncomplicated lower UTI can be treated without culture since the prevalence of disease is 50% or greater in women with classic urinary symptoms.14,45,69,70 Treatment is generally benign, and 95% of urine cultures that are positive will yield a limited number of organisms with predictable antibiotic susceptibilities. Some authors recommend dipstick or microscopic UA (or both) because a negative test might prompt more careful consideration of alternative diagnoses in this group with a high incidence of sexually transmitted disease.14,45 If none is found, such patients can be treated empirically. Traditionally, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was recommended, although increasing resistance to this drug has lead to levofloxacin (itself with unacceptably high resistance rates in many locations) being the current choice of empirical antibiotics.71,72


Urine testing is more likely to influence clinical management in patients with an intermediate pretest probability of infection.10 Urine microscopy may also help in distinguishing pyelonephritis (WBC casts), vaginitis (absence of pyuria or hematuria in a meticulous MSCC or catheterized specimen), and urethritis (pyuria, rarely hematuria) from cystitis (pyuria and often hematuria).14,45 In the ED, the ease of performing a dipstick test argues for its use without UA since it is equally sensitive unless formed elements such as casts, crystals, Trichomonas, or other parasites are suspected. In patients with pyelonephritis, urine cultures are warranted because they alter therapy in about 5% of cases.73 In most asymptomatic patients, a negative dipstick or UA result has sufficient negative predictive value to rule out disease unless the patient is pregnant or undergoing urologic surgery. Special clinical considerations in some patients (e.g., the immunocompromised, diabetic females at high risk for UTI) may mandate adjustments to this approach.15 Recommendations vary regarding infants. Cultures are recommended for all febrile infants younger than 2 months and for children who appear sick or have a high pretest probability of infection.21,23 In a recent study, combined microscopic and dipstick UA was only 64% sensitive (and 91% specific) for culture-proven UTI in febrile infants younger than 24 months, thus suggesting the use of culture unless an alternative source of infection is clear.74



Testing for Pregnancy


Some investigators have found female patients reliable in determining their own pregnancy status.75,76 Others have not.77 With respect to ordering of radiographic studies on women of childbearing age, clinicians should determine from their own practice experience the reliability of patient history in this regard. If in doubt and with the potentially lethal outcome of an ectopic pregnancy, it might be prudent to use an objective test. Pregnancy tests are based on the detection of β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) in serum or urine. β-hCG is secreted by trophoblastic cells of the placenta starting from the time of implantation of the blastocyst. Qualitative serum and urine tests can detect β-hCG levels of between 15 and 25 mIU/mL (Fig. 67-4).78 The concentration of β-hCG is usually lower in urine than in serum, which accounts for the slight advantage of serum tests in detecting early pregnancy. Optimal results on urine pregnancy tests are obtained with first-voided, concentrated morning specimens. It has recently been established that whole blood is a reliable specimen for the bedside dipstick tests used in most EDs.79,80 This alternative may be lifesaving in timely recognition of an ectopic pregnancy in a hypotensive female with pelvic complaints and unknown pregnancy status when a urine specimen is unavailable or results in significant delay.



If fertilization has occurred, β-hCG levels of 5 to 8 mIU/mL (the threshold of the quantitative serum test) correspond to the 9th to 11th day after ovulation (23 to 25 days after the first day of the last normal menstrual period). In a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), the β-hCG level doubles approximately every 2 days during the first 4 weeks of gestation and reaches a serum level of greater than 25 mIU/mL, which is detectable by virtually all pregnancy tests on the first day of the missed menstrual period. The doubling rate declines to every third day thereafter.81,82 β-hCG reaches a peak of between 100,000 and 200,000 mIU/mL between the 10th and 14th gestational weeks and declines to 10,000 to 20,000 mIU/mL for the rest of the pregnancy (Table 67-5). There is a wide range of β-hCG levels in different women at the same stage of gestation, thus making definite clinical determination on the basis of a single quantitative test impossible.83,84 False-positive test results have been described in association with molar pregnancy, choriocarcinoma, teratoma, occasional malignancies outside the genitourinary tract, and very high levels of proteinuria. There is one report of a positive urine β-hCG finding (but normal serum β-hCG) associated with a tuboovarian abscess.85



Although a previous quantitative β-hCG level is rarely available to the emergency clinician, doubling rates are an important part of the assessment of a healthy first-trimester pregnancy. Fetal nonviability, ectopic pregnancy, and intrauterine demise are signaled by abnormalities in the predicted rise in quantitative β-hCG.86,87 A serum quantitative β-hCG level that does not increase by 66% every 48 hours has a 75% chance of being a nonviable pregnancy.87,88 β-hCG levels in a healthy IUP and associated sonographic findings are listed in Table 67-5.


The rate of decline in quantitative β-hCG after gestation depends on the reason for the conclusion of the pregnancy. After a term delivery, β-hCG falls to zero in 2 weeks; after surgery for an ectopic pregnancy, the range is 1 to 31 days, with a median of 8.5 days; after a first-trimester spontaneous abortion, the range is 9 to 35 days (median, 19 days); and after a first-trimester elective abortion, the range is 16 to 60 days (median, 30 days).38


The association between β-hCG levels and gestational dates has led to the concept of the “discriminatory zone.” In a normal pregnancy, a quantitative β-hCG level of 1000 to 2000 mIU/mL should be reflected by the presence of a double decidual sac (at the least) on transvaginal ultrasound (and on transabdominal ultrasound with levels higher than 6500 mIU/mL).89 The clinician should beware of several potential pitfalls in applying this concept. First, it applies only to the double decidual sign, itself subject to interobserver variation among sonographers. The discriminatory zone cannot be extrapolated to the expected levels at which any of the more definitive sonographic signs of IUP such as yolk sac, fetal pole, or cardiac motion should be seen. Second, although it is true that if the double decidual sign is absent at these thresholds the pregnancy is almost certainly abnormal with a significant possibility of being ectopic, the converse—that it is pointless to perform ultrasonography if the quantitative β-hCG level is lower than 1000 mIU/mL—is not true. This is because the discriminatory zone does not preclude the possibility of identifying an ectopic pregnancy (or an IUP) before the quantitative β-hCG level reaches 1500 mIU/mL. Ectopic gestational sacs are pathological and therefore do not display β-hCG levels according to nomograms established for normal IUPs, and advanced ectopic pregnancies may have low β-hCG levels. One percent of ectopic pregnancies have a quantitative β-hCG level of less than 10 mIU/mL, and approximately a third of ectopic pregnancies are diagnosed in patients with a quantitative β-hCG level lower than 1000.90–93 Even if no definitive diagnosis can be made, the clinician should be aware that pregnant ED patients with pelvic complaints and a β-hCG level of 1000 mIU/mL or lower have a fourfold increased risk for ectopic pregnancy in comparison to those with the same symptoms and a β-hCG level higher than 1000 mIU/mL.94


In summary, the “discriminatory zone” provides a basis for interpreting the ultrasound image, but not a basis for deciding whether to perform it.89,90,95 Although the percentage of patients below the “discriminatory zone” who will receive a definitive diagnosis by ultrasound is much lower than the percentage in those above the discriminatory zone (25% versus 90%), even a 25% diagnosis rate would seem to merit pursuit for a potentially lethal condition, especially since follow-up for patients whose evaluation is “indeterminate” on their ED visit is time-consuming and resource-intensive.90,96



Blood Cultures in the ED



Indications


Blood cultures are indicated when the clinical findings suggest an otherwise unidentifiable bacteremic state (Box 67-2). Twenty-five percent of patients with documented bacteremia have periods without fever.97 In the elderly the proportion is even higher, with 50% of bacteremic patients older than 65 having a temperature between 97.1°F (36.2°C) and 100.9° F (38.3°C) and at least 13% with no documented temperature higher than 99.1°F (37.3°C) at any time.98–101 In the elderly, increasing age, vomiting, altered mental status, urinary incontinence, presence of a Foley catheter, or greater than 6% band forms is predictive of a positive blood culture.99,102 The subjective impression of “having fever” in adults is not a reliable indicator of the presence of fever, although the subjective impression of “no fever” is much more likely to be accurate.103 Prediction models to optimize the use of this costly test have been explored but are cumbersome, add little to educated clinical judgment, and lack widespread validation or acceptance.104–106 Many studies have shown that blood cultures in patients with uncomplicated pneumonia or pyelonephritis are of very limited clinical value,107–118 although a recent prospective investigation of patients with upper UTI found that malignancy, an indwelling urinary catheter, and ongoing antimicrobial treatment were clinical conditions that made it significantly more likely that blood cultures would be discordant with urine cultures and that they would reveal clinically important additional information.119 Blood cultures are obtained during 2.8% of all ED visits in the United States, and in a single recent 3-year period this rate increased by 33%.120 Since disease prevalence is unlikely to have changed so rapidly, this increase is probably due to changes in practice. These changes have been coincident with regulatory agency–mandated blood cultures in patients being evaluated for pneumonia and have led to calls for more stringent criteria for obtaining blood cultures.



Box 67-2   Summary of Indications for Obtaining Blood Cultures




In children, the traditional teaching that blood cultures are indicated for all patients younger than 2 years with fever higher than 38.6°C (>101.5°F) and without an obvious source is being modified by the widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate (PC) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (HIB) vaccines.121,122 In the post-PC and post-HIB vaccine era, the incidence of occult bacteremia in otherwise well-appearing febrile children is probably lower than 1%, thus making the false-positive rate at least four times as high.121–123 It seems reasonable to withhold blood cultures and empirical antibiotic coverage in otherwise well-appearing febrile children with reliable parents. The risk for bacteremia in a child is positively correlated with the degree of fever, WBC count, and rapidity of onset of the illness. It is inversely proportional to the patient’s age.124–127 In infants younger than 2 months with temperatures higher than 38°C (>100.5°F), some authorities would recommend blood cultures regardless of the presence or absence of a source, although this approach is subject to modification by experienced clinicians based on the patient’s age and clinical setting. A child with a normal temperature in the ED and a history from the parents of a tactile fever needs to be approached in the same way as a patient with fever documented on physical examination. Parents’ tactile impression of fever is reliable, and bacteremic children, like adults, have intermittent fever, with up to 50% afebrile rates in children with demonstrated bacteremia.128,129



The Controversy Regarding “Outpatient Blood Cultures”


There is a long-standing debate regarding the utility of outpatient blood cultures (i.e., blood cultures on patients who are discharged from the ED pending results). Arguments for and against outpatient blood cultures are summarized in Box 67-3. Opponents cite medicolegal issues, problems with follow-up, high contamination rates, low rates of positive cultures, and even lower rates of frequency in patients in whom therapy is changed because of culture results.130–133 Proponents also cite medicolegal concerns, positive rates similar to those seen with inpatient blood cultures, cost savings, and the benefit of diagnosing significant, yet subtle bacteremic states (such as endocarditis).134,135 They also point out that the high false-positive rates seen in many ED series should be an indictment of poor technique, not of the test itself.



Box 67-3   Summary of Arguments for and against the Performance of Outpatient Blood Cultures




On the basis of current data, it seems fiscally extravagant to admit all patients in whom a bacteremic state is possible and injudicious to deny blood cultures solely on the basis of a patient not appearing “toxic enough” to warrant admission. Societal and economic pressures to avoid hospital admission buttress these clinical considerations. Outpatient blood cultures, with due attention to collection technique, patient selection, and arrangements for follow-up, have a place in emergency practice. This approach is reflected by the fact that fully half of ED blood cultures are obtained on patients who are not admitted to the hospital.120



Technique for Obtaining Blood for Culture


Studies have demonstrated sources of contamination at every stage of the process of performing and processing blood cultures. In addition to obvious sources of contamination from the patient’s and phlebotomist’s skin, antiseptic agents and gloves have been implicated.136,137 Some authorities have argued that the primary source of contamination is in the laboratory processing of specimens.138 The consensus is that the most common source of contamination is the process of phlebotomy and inoculation of blood culture bottles.139 Obviously, this is the single step over which emergency clinicians have control, either directly or via protocols of technique for blood culture phlebotomy. Contamination rates are typically between 1.5% and 3%,121,140,141 although many ED series show much higher rates.132,142


A high degree of sensitivity is required for blood cultures. Many significant bacteremic illnesses have been documented with as little as 1 CFU/10 mL of blood.143,144 In a cadaver study, human skin has been shown to have a bacterial concentration of between 103 and 106 CFUs/mL on the forearm and groin, respectively.145 Designed to detect vanishingly low concentrations of bacteria, the test is clearly susceptible to false-positive results (impaired specificity) when blood must necessarily be obtained by passing a needle through the skin. Eighty percent of the skin flora is transient, superficial, and removable; 20% inhabit the sebaceous ducts and hair follicles and cannot be removed without destroying the skin.145,146 The former group consists of predominantly gram-positive and gram-negative aerobes and is the target of skin disinfectants.


The primary agents for skin disinfection are iodine compounds, alcohols, chlorhexidine, and hexachlorophene. Iodine solution remains a gold standard and kills bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses but has been replaced in many institutions because of concern about skin burns and allergic reactions. Reports of the former were probably due to the use of 7% solution. The risk for a burn or an allergic reaction is thought to be negligible with the currently available 2% preparation.139 The most effective cleansing agent is tincture of iodine, which is a mixture of 2% iodine solution and 70% alcohol.147,148 Povidone-iodine 10% solution (Betadine) has a much lower free iodine concentration than iodine solution and is therefore less potent. Iodine is superior to hexachlorophene and chlorhexidine in killing gram-negative bacteria. Iodine, like other antiseptic agents, is inhibited by the presence of organic matter and thus requires thorough skin cleansing before the application of any skin disinfectant.


Ethyl or isopropyl alcohol should be used in a 60% to 80% solution. Alcohol prep pads, which generally contain 70% isopropanol, have solved traditional concerns regarding evaporation of alcohol from cotton balls stored in jars. Alcohol is a less powerful germicide than iodine in vitro and kills only 90% of surface bacteria after a full 2 minutes with reapplication to prevent drying.149 Alcohol foam applicators can avoid premature drying. Alcohol is inactive against fungi, spores, and viruses, but in vivo studies of blood culture contamination rates have shown it to compare favorably with iodine.147,150 Because iodine solution is often not available and iodophor solutions are less potent, alcohol still has an important place in skin antisepsis. In addition, alcohol is an excellent solvent, so alcohol pads may assist in skin preparation by removing dirt- and microbe-laden skin oils before the application of iodine compounds.


Chlorhexidine (Hibiclens) and hexachlorophene (pHisoHex) are antiseptics that are more effective against gram-positive than gram-negative bacteria. Both agents are absorbed intradermally, thereby offering prolonged antimicrobial activity, which is the basis of their popularity as surgical scrub and operative site preparations. This also makes them preferable agents when indwelling lines, especially central lines, are being placed.151 For routine blood culture phlebotomy, they are not as effective as alcohol and iodine combinations, although they are superior to povidone-iodine solution.141 Most studies show chlorhexidine to be more potent than hexachlorophene, and it has not been associated with induction of seizures in infants.


Box 67-4 presents a skin preparation protocol. Optimal results seem to be obtained with alcohol-iodine mixtures.145,148,152,153 The most important concept in skin disinfection is that bacteria do not die at the instant of contact with disinfectant agents. Iodine (2%), which is twice as potent as 10% povidone-iodine, requires at least 90 seconds in contact with the skin to kill 90% of surface bacteria.149 In many ED patients it will be necessary to use alcohol prep pads to remove gross dirt and debris from phlebotomy sites before initiating the steps of formal skin preparation.



Box 67-4   Skin Preparation and Technique for Drawing Blood for Culture




Cleanse the skin with alcohol swabs three times or until the swabs appear entirely free of surface dirt.


Allow to dry.


Apply 10% povidone-iodine or (preferably) 2% iodine solution or (ideally) 2% tincture of iodine in 70% alcohol three times in centrifugal circles from the anticipated site of venipuncture.


After the third swab, allow to dry for at least 60 seconds. During this period:


Related posts:

  1. Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
  2. Cricothyrotomy and Percutaneous Translaryngeal Ventilation
  3. Special Neurologic Tests and Procedures
  4. Alternative Methods of Drug Administration

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Tags:
Sep 17, 2016 | Posted by in SUGERY, ORTHOPEDICS & ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Bedside Laboratory and Microbiologic Procedures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access