Meryl S. Cohen The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Common atrioventricular canal defects are a group of cardiac anomalies characterized by abnormalities of endocardial cushion‐derived structures during embryologic development of the heart. The essence of the abnormality is that both atria are connected to a common (single) atrioventricular valve annulus or junction. Typically there are deficiencies in the atrial and ventricular septa as well as abnormalities of the atrioventricular valves along with the common annulus. Of note, there are several different terms used to describe this defect including atrioventricular septal defect, endocardial cushion defect, and common atrioventricular orifice. For the remainder of this chapter the term common atrioventricular canal defect (CAVC) will be used because it is inclusive of the abnormality of the atrioventricular valve. CAVC is a spectrum of disease from an exclusive atrial communication to a large ventricular communication. Importantly, all have a common annulus with an elongated left ventricular outflow tract. The septal defects usually dictate the physiology and the clinical course. There is also a range of abnormalities of the common atrioventricular valve and incompetence of the valve is typical. CAVC is commonly associated with Down syndrome. At least 40% of children with Down syndrome have congenital heart disease and of those, CAVC is one of the most common lesions seen, along with isolated ventricular septal defect (VSD) [1]. The incidence of CAVC is approximately 34.8 per 100,000 live births (range 24.2 to 39.6 per 100,000), representing the ninth most common congenital heart lesion [2]. The incidence is likely higher in the fetal population since termination of pregnancy is sometimes performed if congenital heart disease or a chromosomal abnormality such as Down syndrome is detected before birth. A strong link exists between CAVC and Down syndrome (trisomy 21); the risk of CAVC is 1000‐fold compared with those with normal chromosomes. Despite this known association, the responsible gene on chromosome 21 has yet to be identified. DSCAM (Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule) has been proposed as a possible candidate gene [3]. CAVC can also have an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance or occur sporadically [4]. An association with chromosome 8p deletion and familial clusters with different modes of inheritance have also been reported [5,6]. CAVC is seen frequently in association with the heterotaxy syndrome, particularly the asplenia (right isomerism) type. Prior to the formation of the endocardial cushions, cardiac jelly expands in the region between the atria and the primitive ventricles, the so‐called atrioventricular canal. The endocardial cushions are the primordia of the valves and septa of the developed heart which form as a result of epithelial to mesenchymal transformation [7]. The process of normal atrioventricular septation requires: (i) fusion of four mesenchymal masses or “cushions” in the middle of an initially common atrioventricular junction or canal; (ii) a mesenchymal cap on the leading edge of the (primary) atrial septum; and (iii) normal formation of the dorsal mesenchymal protrusion or vestibular spine (Figure 16.1). The process of fusion needs to take place along with rightward expansion of the atrioventricular junction and perforation of the superior margin of the primary atrial septum in order to create both normal atrioventricular connections and alignments as well as access of oxygenated blood from the ductus venosus to the left heart through the oval fossa. Once fused, the four mesenchymal cushions form an anchor point around which separate right and left atrioventricular junctions can expand, off‐setting of the atrioventricular valves can develop and the aortic root can move into a central “wedged” position. The cushions themselves form the fibrous or membranous components of the atrioventricular septum, including the central fibrous body, as well as the septal leaflet of the tricuspid and anterior leaflet of the mitral valves. Abnormal development of these components results in CAVC. Detailed description of development of the endocardial cushions can be found in several publications [7–9]. Common atrioventricular canal defects are categorized in several ways. The deficiency in the atrioventricular septum is typically the same in all forms, with the relationship of the atrioventricular valve within that defect being variable. Indeed, if the atrioventricular valve leaflets are removed from a heart specimen with CAVC, it is not possible to distinguish between the various subtypes. The complete form of CAVC is characterized by an interatrial communication anteroinferior to the margin of the fossa ovalis and adjacent to the atrioventricular valves, along with a large posterior VSD along the septal leaflet of the atrioventricular valve extending into the membranous septum, giving the ventricular septum a scooped‐out appearance (Figures 16.2 and 16.3). The atrial and ventricular communications are contiguous with each other and only divided by the atrioventricular valve as a result of absence of the canal portion of the septum. Instead of two distinct atrioventricular valves with separate annuli or junctions, there is a common atrioventricular valve with a common annulus. Typically there are two mural or lateral leaflets positioned exclusively over the right ventricle and one mural leaflet positioned exclusively over the left ventricle that can be variable in size [10]. In the normal heart, the aorta sits wedged between the mitral valve and the tricuspid valve annuli (Figure 16.4a). In CAVC, there are two leaflets that bridge the crest of the ventricular septum in the superior and inferior position (Figure 16.4b). The common annulus results in anterior displacement (“unwedging”) of the aortic outflow tract. This displacement elongates the left ventricular outflow tract, making it vulnerable to obstruction (Figure 16.5) [11]. The inferior bridging leaflet has extensive chordal attachments to the crest of the ventricular septum while the chordal attachments of the superior bridging leaflet are variable and have been subclassified by Rastelli and colleagues (Figure 16.6) [12]. In Rastelli type A, the superior bridging leaflet is divided at the crest of the ventricular septum; some describe this as minimal bridging (Figure 16.7a and c). In type B arrangement, the rarest form, division of the superior bridging leaflet occurs at a right ventricular papillary muscle which is often displaced onto the septal surface of the right ventricle. In type C, the superior bridging leaflet is undivided or “free floating;” it can also be described as extreme bridging. This is the most rudimentary form of CAVC and common in Down syndrome (Figure 16.7b and d). Rastelli type A is more commonly associated with preoperative left ventricular outflow obstruction in part because of increased elongation of the outflow tract [13]. The complete form of CAVC is typically seen in children with Down syndrome but can be seen in children with normal chromosomes as well. In a more unusual form of complete CAVC, the atrioventricular valve sits superiorly in the atrioventricular septal defect attached to the atrial septum such that the atrial communication is trivial or absent and the ventricular communication is large (Figure 16.2). Even rarer is the CAVC defect where atrioventricular valve tissue fills in the atrial and ventricular communications and there is no shunting whatsoever. The partial (also known as incomplete) form of CAVC is characterized by an interatrial communication in the canal portion of the atrial septum (located between the anteroinferior margin of the fossa ovalis and the atrioventricular valves) with a common atrioventricular valve annulus divided into two atrioventricular valve orifices at the ventricular septum (Figure 16.2c). This subtype is often called ostium primum atrial septal defect. However, this term does not fully describe the atrioventricular valve abnormality or the fact that the defect in the atrioventricular septum is the same as in the complete form of CAVC. The distinction is that the atrioventricular valve tissue is adherent to the crest of the ventricular septum forming a connecting tongue, thus allowing no ventricular level shunt and dividing the common annulus into two orifices (Figure 16.3). Although the two orifices are separate, the valves do not resemble normal tricuspid and mitral valves. In particular, the left atrioventricular valve has a trifoliate rather than a bifoliate appearance. Where the superior and inferior bridging leaflets meet at the ventricular septum is often called a “cleft” but is usually not a true deficit of tissue but rather a commissure (Figure 16.8). Atrioventricular valve regurgitation at the level of apposition of the superior and inferior bridging leaflets (the so‐called “cleft”) in CAVC is typical. There is an intermediate form in the spectrum of CAVC known as transitional type typified by significant chordal attachments of the superior bridging leaflet to the ventricular septum with restrictive shunting through these chordae at the ventricular level. The VSD component is typically small enough that the right ventricle is at subsystemic pressure. Other rare intermediate types include variants where there is a large atrial and ventricular component but the superior and inferior bridging leaflets are fused together resulting in a common annulus with two atrioventricular valve orifices. In CAVC, the relationship of the atrial septum to the common atrioventricular valve may be balanced or unbalanced. In the balanced form, the atrial septum sits over the ventricular septum with relatively equal distribution of atrial inflow to the right and left side of the atrioventricular valve. Rarely, the atrial septum is malaligned in relation to the ventricular septum (known as “double‐outlet atrium”) such that the atrial septum is deviated predominantly towards the left atrial inflow (double‐outlet right atrium) or the right atrial inflow (double‐outlet left atrium) (Figure 16.9). Inflow into the contralateral ventricular may be limited in some cases. Maldistribution of the atrioventricular valve over the ventricles occurs much more commonly than double‐outlet atrium and accounts for 10% of all cases of CAVC [14]. When the atrioventricular valve sits more over one ventricle than the other, the contralateral ventricle is typically hypoplastic (Figures 16.9 and 16.10). Unbalance to the right (with left ventricular hypoplasia) is more common and is often associated with other levels of left‐sided obstruction such as subaortic stenosis or coarctation of the aorta. In its most extreme form, unbalance to the right is a variant of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, sometimes with no left ventricular cavity seen. Unbalance to the left (with right ventricular hypoplasia) can be associated with pulmonary outflow obstruction. In CAVC, the left ventricular anterolateral papillary muscles are often more closely spaced than normal [15]. Left atrioventricular valve abnormalities can also be seen in approximately 5% of CAVC, most typically double‐orifice or single papillary muscle (parachute) types [16]. These lesions are more common in partial CAVC and can also be seen in association with unbalanced defects to the right with concomitant left ventricular hypoplasia. Such valve abnormalities may complicate surgical repair with possible residual left atrioventricular valve regurgitation, stenosis, or both [16,17]. Frequently associated lesions include tetralogy of Fallot (usually seen in children with Down syndrome), patent ductus arteriosus, coarctation of the aorta, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Ostium secundum atrial septal defects and additional VSDs can also be seen. In heterotaxy/isomerism, CAVC is common particularly in the right isomerism (asplenia) type. Inlet‐type VSD (otherwise known as atrioventricular canal‐type VSD) can exist as an entity without a common atrioventricular junction. These are defects along the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve often with straddling of the tricuspid valve chordae into the left ventricle. Often the ventricular septum is malaligned from the atrial septum with concurrent right ventricular hypoplasia. These defects are frequently seen in association with complex congenital heart disease. The clinical course of a patient with a CAVC defect is variable and depends on the magnitude of atrial and ventricular level shunting, the severity of atrioventricular valve regurgitation, the degree of unbalance at the level of the ventricles if present, and other associated lesions. In the balanced form of CAVC, ventricular level left‐to‐right shunting is determined almost exclusively by the pulmonary vascular resistance since the defect is large and unrestrictive with right ventricular and pulmonary artery pressure at the systemic level. In the early newborn period, symptoms are few but as the pulmonary vascular resistance decreases over the first 6–8 weeks of life, the amount of left‐to‐right ventricular shunting increases with a concomitant increase in pulmonary blood flow and volume overload to the left atrium and ventricle. If left uncorrected, this defect will result in symptoms of congestive heart failure including growth failure, respiratory symptoms, and tachycardia. When the atrial septal defect is the predominant lesion, the left‐to‐right shunt is determined primarily by the relative compliance of the right and left ventricles. Shunting increases over the first few months of life as right ventricular compliance increases. Atrial level shunting causes dilation of the right atrium, right ventricle, and pulmonary arteries. If atrial level shunting is in isolation, most young children tolerate this increased pulmonary blood flow well and are asymptomatic, but dyspnea or growth failure can occur in some cases [18]. In those with transitional type of CAVC, restrictive ventricular level shunting is seen in combination with the atrial level shunt. Depending on the magnitude of the ventricular level shunting, some will have evidence of heart failure while others with smaller shunts will not. Atrioventricular valve regurgitation particularly of the left atrioventricular valve can also cause an undue volume burden on the left atrium and ventricle resulting in cardiomegaly and symptoms of heart failure. If CAVC is not surgically addressed, pulmonary vascular disease will likely ensue. This will occur earlier (within the first year of life) in those with large ventricular communications but can also occur in those with exclusive atrial communication in later decades of life. Although the restrictive VSD in the transitional type of CAVC can close spontaneously over time with atrioventricular valve tissue, the ostium primum atrial septal defect and the large CAVC‐type VSD do not typically close spontaneously. Those children with Down syndrome and CAVC are at higher risk for the development of pulmonary vascular obstructive disease within the first year of life. Studies of children with and without Down syndrome have demonstrated that those with Down syndrome are more likely to have elevated pulmonary vascular resistance at the time of surgical repair [19]. Noncardiac issues may come into play in Down syndrome including chronic airway obstruction and central hypoventilation. Common atrioventricular canal defects are imaged from multiple acoustic windows. 2D imaging provides excellent visualization of the anatomy in CAVC and is utilized along with color and spectral Doppler techniques to perform a comprehensive anatomic and physiologic evaluation of the defect. 3D echocardiography augments 2D imaging by demonstrating details of atrioventricular valve anatomy, etiology of atrioventricular valve regurgitation, level of shunting, and assessment of the left ventricular outflow tract. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), often used to assess surgical repair of CAVC, can be utilized as a diagnostic tool in patients with suboptimal transthoracic windows or inconclusive diagnosis. Rarely, cardiac catheterization is required before surgery to augment the information provided by the echocardiogram. Subxiphoid imaging provides excellent windows to evaluate the atrial septum and the relationship of the common atrioventricular valve to the septum. In particular, the subxiphoid frontal (long‐axis) view (Video 16.1) and the “in‐between” left anterior oblique (LAO) acoustic sweep demonstrate the size of the ostium primum‐type atrial septal defect (Figure 16.11, Video 16.2
CHAPTER 16
Common Atrioventricular Canal Defects
Definition
Incidence
Etiology
Morphology and classification
Developmental considerations
Anatomy
Pathophysiology
Imaging
Transthoracic imaging
Complete CAVC
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel