Peter Green, Jamie Cordery and Alex Barlow Peter Green The principal statute in England and Wales governing wild deer is the Deer Act (1991), amended by Statutory Instrument (SI) 2183 (2007). Free-living wild deer in the open countryside do not belong to anyone; they are not in the ownership of the landowner until they are ‘reduced into possession’. This means that wild deer become the property of the landowner when either they die on his/her land or are caught alive on that land. The Deer Act and SI 2183 specify certain legally enforceable rules about wild deer management. It is unlawful to catch wild deer by nets, traps or stupefying drugs unless a licence to do so is issued by Natural England (NE) or Natural Resources Wales (NRW). Similarly, it is unlawful to cull wild deer during the specified ‘close seasons’ or to cull them at night unless specifically licenced to do so by NE or NRW. ‘Night’ is defined as the period between one hour after sunset and one hour before sunrise. Arrows, crossbow darts, air guns and smooth-bored firearms may not lawfully be used to cull deer; minimum rifle calibres and muzzle energies are specified by the legislation. However, to relieve suffering, any ‘reasonable’ method may be used to dispatch injured or diseased deer at any time. Under section 7 of the Deer Act, deer may be culled out of season (including by shotgun) if they are causing crop damage, although this is judicially regarded as a defence to a legal action brought under the Deer Act, not as permission or an excuse to be able to shoot deer out of season at will. Farmed deer are provided with certain exemptions. The legal status of deer in deer parks is considered in Chapter 5. In Northern Ireland, similar provisions are made under the Wildlife Northern Ireland) Order (1985) and its subsequent amendments. In Scotland, similar regulations are provided by the Deer Scotland Act (1996) and its subsequent amendments. Scotland is unique in the United Kingdom because, under the Wildlife and Natural Environment Act (2011), landowners have a duty of care to safeguard the welfare of wild deer on their property if, by virtue of overpopulation of deer or other land management factors, deer welfare is compromised. In 2024, Scotland abolished all close seasons for male deer. Other English and Welsh legislation that governs the treatment of deer includes the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981), which deals with trapping, snaring and the use of decoys to catch wild animals, and the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act (1996), which prohibits the kicking, beating, stabbing, impaling, burning, crushing, stoning, dragging, asphyxiating or drowning of any wild mammal. Under the Hunting Act (2004) it is unlawful to use dogs to hunt and kill deer, although a maximum of two dogs may be used to flush out deer or to aid in legal deer stalking. Wild deer taken into captivity, for whatever reason, become ‘protected animals’ under the terms of the Animal Welfare Act (2006). Under the Animal Health Act (1981) it is compulsory to notify the authorities of certain diseases, such as Foot and Mouth Disease, Rabies, Tuberculosis and Anthrax. These may affect wild deer. The arrangements, controls and powers for each specific disease are set out in Statutory Orders and Regulations, which are regularly revised. Such Orders and Regulations have been issued for emerging diseases, such as in the Bluetongue Order (2007) and the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies Regulation (2008). Epizootic haemorrhagic disease has been made notifiable under the Exotic Animal Disease (Amendment) (England) Order (2022). It is notoriously difficult to count wild deer populations. For many years, the British Deer Society (BDS, https://bds.org.uk/science-research/deer-surveys/deer-distribution-survey/) has published and regularly updated deer distribution maps for each of the six deer species found in Britain. These have been based on surveys and reports by informed BDS members, academic researchers and students. The maps clearly show that all the deer species have expanded their ranges in the twenty-first century, with Reeves’ muntjac and roe deer becoming established widely compared with their distribution in 2000. These surveys do not, however, provide an estimate of numbers or deer densities. The BDS is therefore attempting to gather abundance data together with distribution. The Mammal Society (2018) estimated the total population of deer in the United Kingdom to be approximately two million, a very significant increase since the turn of the century. At such levels, wild deer are having an adverse impact on native habitats. The Woodland Trust has made clear that ‘Deer are an important part of the UK’s woodland ecology and can have a vital role to play in balanced woodland and wood-pasture ecosystems. However, with numbers thought to be higher than at any time in the last 1,000 years, in many parts of the UK they have reached levels where they seriously threaten the habitats that they and other species depend on. Browsing by deer is now a major threat to the health and resilience of woodlands’ (Woodland Trust 2020). The drive to plant and grow millions of trees in the United Kingdom is unlikely to succeed in the face of wild deer numbers that have increased by more than 400% since the 1970s (Defra 2020). The browsing by deer upon trees and shrubs not only inhibits growth and may kill the trees, it also has very serious effects upon populations of native birds (Holt et al. 2013). In urban and peri-urban areas, wild deer are becoming established in gardens, parks, cemeteries, roadside amenity plantings and other habitats. Increased road traffic accidents and browsing damage to gardens, exhibition parks, horticulture and market gardening are problematic. Scotland was aware of the problems that were arising early in the twenty-first century (Dandy et al. 2009); these problems have increased and are not unique to the United Kingdom (Putman et al. 2014). In England the species most likely to become urbanised is the Reeves’ muntjac. Deer management in urban areas cannot be based on the use of high-velocity firearms. Appropriate deer-proof fencing is usually the only solution if deer are causing damage. A novel deer repellent has been reported to show some potential for limiting damage to shrubs (Curtis and Eshenauer 2022). Several colleges of further and higher education in the United Kingdom offer courses in gamekeeping, countryside management or forestry that include formal teaching in the management of wild deer. A not-for-profit limited company ‘Deer Management Qualifications’ (DMQ Ltd.) provides a system of qualifications for deer stalkers and deer managers in the United Kingdom. This trains and assesses candidates in a wide range of skills, including the ecology and biology of deer, marksmanship, law, safety, animal welfare in culling deer and dealing with carcase hygienically. Qualifications are at two certificate levels: the Deer Stalking Certificate Levels 1 and 2 (DSC 1 and 2). DSC 1 is usually undertaken and assessed over a residential week course, starting with formal classroom sessions, a written examination and concluding with a rifle marksmanship test on the range. The qualification includes a food hygiene element that satisfies current food hygiene regulations concerning wild game. DSC 2 takes the candidate further and involves a real-life deer stalk in which a wild deer is culled. This is observed and scrutinised by an independent, approved witness who reports back to DMQ Ltd. An assessor then interviews the candidate, usually remotely, to evaluate knowledge, experience and reflection of the witnessed stalk. There are currently (September 2024) some 33 000 DSC 1 certificate holders and some 6000 holders of DSC 2. DMQ also offers a separate wild boar certificate. Professional and recreational deer stalkers who are working for landowners, fulfilling contracts for land-owning charities or applying for sporting deer stalking leases are increasingly required to hold the DSC 2 as part of their portfolio. The United Kingdom is unusual, amongst European countries, in not having a statutory hunting test as a prerequisite to shooting wild deer. The BDS offers an Advanced Deer Management Course taught over a three-day programme. It includes deer census techniques, population dynamics, impact assessments, cull planning and deer in forestry and agriculture. Candidates sit an examination and are awarded a certificate recognised by Lantra, an independent training provider for land-based industries. As the DSC 1 course includes teaching on the basic biology, ecology and anatomy of deer, these elements of the course are often taught by veterinarians with an interest in deer. Under the Animals Scientific Procedures Act (1986), often referred to as ASPA, a veterinarian is required to oversee procedures that come within the terms of the Act. When research involving wild deer is proposed, veterinarians with experience or expertise in deer work may be called upon to be the nominated veterinarian for the research project. Such nominees may be staff members of the university faculty undertaking the research, but they may also be veterinarians in private practice who work with wild deer in both a commercial and recreational manner. A particularly contentious area of work is the use of darts and darting to immobilise and catch wild deer for either research or translocation purposes. In the United Kingdom, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) has determined that an intramuscular injection is an act of veterinary surgery and cannot be undertaken by a layperson. The exemptions for farmers treating livestock and veterinary nurses are not available or applicable to laypersons darting wild deer, even if a veterinarian is present. The Deer Act (1991), the Deer Scotland Act (1996) and the Wildlife Northern Ireland Order (1985) prohibit the use of stupefying drugs to catch deer unless licensed by NE, NRW, NatureScot or the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and, in any event, laypersons cannot hold or administer the prescription-only medicine (POM) drugs necessary for the darting of deer unless licensed by the Home Office. Further difficulties arise because drugs such as tiletamine, zolazepam and atipamezole, widely used in deer darting, have no established maximum residue levels (MRLs) under food standards legislation. Animals treated with these drugs must be withheld from the human food chain (Food Standards Regulation 37/2010). An increasing number of veterinarians are becoming involved in clinical work with deer in the United Kingdom, either because of services to clients with deer farms or because the deer park sector is realising that owners of enclosed and captive deer are considered by the statutory authorities to have responsibility for the health and welfare of their deer. The British Deer Veterinary Association promotes best practice in deer veterinary work and provides a platform for deer veterinarians to engage with each other. It also offers advice to veterinarians in general practice who may be required to deal with wild deer in the course of their work. Membership is open to veterinarians with an interest in deer. In the United Kingdom, deer stalkers are not required to pay an annual licence fee in order to hunt. There is no mandatory requirement to draw up or adhere to a deer management plan. There is no municipal or regional control of deer stalking or of management areas or their size. Landowners possess the stalking rights on their land irrespective of the size and can sell it, lease it or decide to undertake no deer management at all. Landowners are not required to cooperate or work together with respect to deer management. Deer stalkers who lease sporting rights can choose to cull as many or as few deer as they please, subject to the landowner’s instructions or conditions of the lease. A brief outline of deer management and varying statutory regulations in some European countries is given in Table 7.1 (summarised from Apollonio et al. 2010). Table 7.1 A brief outline of deer management and varying statutory regulations in some European countries (summarised from Apollonio et al. 2010).
Chapter 7
Wild Deer in the UK (Health and Welfare, Deer-Vehicle Collisions and Disease Surveillance)
7.1 Wild deer in Great Britain–health and welfare topics
Statutory Regulation of Wild Deer and Their Management in the United Kingdom
Deer Abundance and Distribution in the United Kingdom
Qualifications for Deer Management in the United Kingdom
Veterinary Involvement in the UK Deer Sector
Deer Management in European Countries Other than the United Kingdom
Country
Ownership of deer and hunting rights
Who decides, seasons and quotas?
Who writes the Deer Management Plan?
Who culls the deer?
Austria
Landowner owns both
Each Province sets seasons
Each Province is divided into Hunting Districts. The cull plan for each District is drawn up by the hunters and approved by regional authorities
Hunters pay an annual licence fee to Provincial Government and then either individually or as a club lease Hunting Districts from landowners
Belgium
Landowner owns both
Flemish Government decides seasons
Game Management Units (GMUs) submit cull plan to District Forest Officer
Hunters are organised into GMUs. Hunters pay annual licence fee to Government and GMU pays lease fee to landowner
Denmark
Landowner owns both
Ministry of the Environment (ME) under the National Hunting Act (1993)
Regional Hunting Management Groups decide on cull quotas to be approved by ME
Approximately 170 000 hunters pay an annual licence fee to ME and a lease fee to the landowner
Finland
Government owns the deer. Landowner owns the hunting rights
Seasons set by the Department Fisheries and Game
Regional Game Management Districts (GMD) decide quotas
Approximately 300 000 hunters pay an annual fee to GMD and a fee for each animal culled
France
Landowner owns both
Minimum close seasons set by central Government. Each Départment may extend them
The Departmental Hunting Federation draws up management plans
Hunters pay the Départment an annual fee for administration, insurance and crop damage. Hunting clubs pay a lease fee to landowners
Germany
No one owns the live deer. Hunting rights owned by landowner
Each state sets seasons and minimum sizes of hunting areas (reviers)
Regional Authorities approve cull plans drawn up by groups of reviers acting together
Hunters pay an annual licence fee to the State and the revier hunting club pays a lease fee to the landowner
Italy
Deer are the property of the community. Hunting rights are held by Provincial Government
Minimum close seasons are set by Central Government. Each Provincial Government may extend them
Provinces are divided into General Hunting Districts or Alpine Hunting Districts, which decide management plans
Hunters pay an annual licence fee to the Provincial Government. They are then issued with licences that specify numbers, species and age of deer they can cull in their local Hunting District
The Netherlands
Government (the people) own the deer. Landowners and land users own the hunting rights
All deer species are fully protected by National Law and may only be killed if there is a definite reason for doing so (public health and safety, protection of crops); seasons are set by the Government
Hunters must be organised into Fauna Management Units (FMU) and have no less than 5000 ha under their control. The FMU writes the Fauna Management Plan (FMP)
Hunters pay an annual licence fee to the central Government and the FMU pays a lease fee to the landowner(s)
Norway
Landowner owns both
Municipal Wildlife Board (MWB)
Landowner, to be approved by MWB
Approximately 20 000 licenced hunters who pay a licence fee and pay a fee for each animal culled to MWB
Sweden
Landowner owns both
Swedish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) decides seasons on an annual basis
![]()
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access