Tumors of the Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses

15 Tumors of the Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses








5. How are nasal neoplasms differentiated from other nasal diseases?

The complete workup for a dog with a nasal discharge typically involves radiographs, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy (either blind or with rhinoscopy). Plain radiography will help confirm the presence of nasal/paranasal sinus disease but often does not help differentiate among infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic diseases. Evaluation of nasal exudates obtained by swabbing or a saline solution flush is most often unrewarding. Aerobic culturing generally results in an abundant yield of normal bacterial flora or bacterial pathogens representing a secondary infection that accompanies the primary disease process. Fungal infections may be differentiated from neoplasia, bacterial infection, and allergic nasal disease with a combination of radiographic signs, rhinoscopic examination, and serologic examination. Cryptococcus organisms may be easily identified on cytologic examination of exudates; however, a cytologic diagnosis of nasal cancer from exudate examination alone is made infrequently. Fungal hyphae (Aspergillus spp.) may be observed in the exudates of healthy dogs. Penicillium and Aspergillus may be grown in cultures from healthy dogs or dogs with a variety of other nasal diseases. Unfortunately, fungal serology is only reliably useful for Cryptococcus.


Histopathologic examination of tissue from the nasal cavity is often the only way to differentiate between the varieties of nasal diseases, particularly nasal cancer. Few laboratory abnormalities are associated with the most common nasal tumors of dogs. On careful oral examination, palpation may reveal a mass in the pharynx or deviation of the hard palate or signs of dental disease may be noted in the maxillary arcade on the same side as the nasal discharge. Although thoracic metastasis at the time of presentation is uncommon, a suspicion of nasal or paranasal cancer warrants three-view thoracic radiographs to assess for metastasis.




8. What does advanced imaging (CT or MRI) contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of nasal neoplasms?

Plain radiography is an adequate screening test to rule out some causes of epistaxis or nasal discharge; however, advanced imaging is needed to assess the disease more completely. CT with and without contrast/enhancement is more accurate for determining the extent of local tumor infiltration than is plain radiography (Fig. 15-3). Furthermore, the length of survival is related to the extent of tumor involvement based on CT findings for dogs treated with radiation therapy.



Dogs with neurologic abnormalities referable to the central nervous system should undergo CT and/or MRI to determine the extent of invasion into the calvarium. Unfortunately, as with plain radiography, there is no pattern of CT abnormalities consistently associated with nasal and paranasal sinus neoplasms. CT guidance of the biopsy instrument enhances tissue sampling accuracy. In general, soft tissue details are better imaged with MRI than with CT. MRI is superior to CT and plain radiography for demonstrating the extent of tumor invasion into the frontal and olfactory lobes. Because CT or MRI provides a better view of tumors than plain radiography, it is a prerequisite for radiation therapy. Computed tomography findings are used to calculate the radiation dose and the field for radiation treatments in most treatment centers. CT findings can help in estimating the extent of radiation damage to normal tissues, particularly the eye.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 31, 2016 | Posted by in INTERNAL MEDICINE | Comments Off on Tumors of the Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access