Thoracoscopic Contraindications, Complications, and Conversion

31
Thoracoscopic Contraindications, Complications, and Conversion


J. Brad Case and Jeffrey J. Runge


Thoracoscopy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was first described in 1910 by H.C. Jacobaeus as a minimally invasive method for diagnosing and treating humans with pulmonary adhesions secondary to tuberculosis. Jacobaeus recognized very early the unique advantages of thoracoscopy and wrote: “Without doubt, the predominant value of endoscopy centres around the examination of the pleural cavities, the so-called thoracoscopy.” At the time, exploratory thoracotomy was not performed because of the exceptionally high morbidity associated with an open thorax. Jacobaeus went on to explain: “With regard to the chest cavity there is as we know, nothing corresponding to exploratory laparotomy.”1 Since the time of Jacobaeus, thoracoscopy has evolved immensely and is now described for a myriad of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in both human and veterinary surgery. Furthermore, the indications in veterinary medicine for VATS compared with traditional invasive procedures are constantly evolving. That said, specific indications and contraindications for VATS procedures are lacking in the veterinary literature. In human VATS, few explicit contraindications exist. These include diffuse body wall neoplasia, diffuse pleural adhesions, and lack of cardiopulmonary reserve to tolerate lung collapse.2 Currently, in veterinary surgery, patients are candidates for VATS if they are hemodynamically stable, have a disease that can be treated effectively and safely with VATS methodology, and have owners that have been counseled on the risks and potential for conversion to thoracotomy. Clearly, subjectivity exists when defining a patient as suitable for a particular VATS procedure because guidelines in veterinary medicine do not exist. The experience and training of the surgeon and surgery team, facilities and equipment, and capabilities for intraoperative as well as postoperative support further complicate the decision-making process.


Strategies to Avoid Complications


Preoperative Assessment


Dogs and cats undergoing VATS should have a thorough preoperative evaluation, including a complete physical and neurologic examination, complete blood count, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and thoracic imaging. Fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base abnormalities should be addressed before anesthesia. Anemic dogs should be transfused with erythroid-rich blood (packed red blood cells or whole blood) to maximize oxygen-carrying capacity before anesthesia and VATS. Significant hemorrhage or preoperative anemia can complicate the procedure and compromise the patient during VATS. Because oxygen delivery (CO × O2 content) to tissues is dependent on the oxygen content of blood (Hg × SPO2 × 1.34 + PaO2 × 0.003), most significantly hemoglobin, patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery should have a minimum preoperative hematocrit of 30% and blood transfusion should be considered in patients with marked intraoperative hemorrhage. A cross-match should be performed ahead of surgery, and donor blood should be readily available if needed in an emergency. Rupture of a great ­thoracic vessel may result in the near-immediate death of the patient if not dealt with rapidly, and the surgeon must avoid this complication by judicious preparation, careful attention to technique, and possessing the ability to convert to thoracotomy rapidly.


Depending on the underlying pathology or suspected pathology, survey thoracic radiography, echocardiography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be indicated. In general, dogs with pericardial effusion should undergo echocardiography in addition to survey radiography and electrocardiography before VATS pericardectomy and pericardoscopy. If diastolic function is compromised by cardiac tamponade, pericardiocentesis should be performed before surgery. Echocardiography is more sensitive in detecting epicardial masses if ­pericardial fluid is present.3 MRI does not appear to be reliable in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic causes of pericardial disease in dogs.4 In dogs with a pronounced pneumothorax or pleural effusion, preoperative thoracocentesis or placement of a thoracic drain should be accomplished before VATS. Thorough preoperative assessment facilitates patient selection for a VATS approach and therefore reduces the risk for conversion to thoracotomy and allows for more accurate surgical planning.


Patient Preparation and Conversion


Dogs and cats undergoing VATS are prepared similarly to those undergoing traditional thoracotomy. This is because general surgical principles apply to both open and VATS operations and because VATS may require elective or emergent conversion to an open thoracotomy if complications such as inability to complete the procedure or major hemorrhage occur. It is therefore mandatory that the minimally invasive thoracic surgeon has a secondary site prepared for an open conversion for all VATS procedures. Finocietto retractors, electrosurgical capabilities, vascular forceps and clip applicators, vessel-sealing devices, and staplers normally used for open thoracic surgery should be made available in the operating suite ready for immediate use.5 For patients in which a median sternotomy may be used for conversion, an oscillating saw should be present. After the VATS patient is induced, a wide surgical clip is completed, which includes the regions that may be needed if conversion becomes necessary. Thoracic surgical site infections have the potential to progress to pyothorax if not detected early and treated effectively. Thus, careful attention to surgical asepsis and patient preparation should be considered paramount in patients undergoing thoracic surgery even if a minimal VATS approach is used.


Antimicrobial Prophylaxis


Perioperative antibiotic administration is recommended in VATS patients just as it is recommended in patients undergoing open thoracic surgery to reduce the risk of surgical wound infection.6 All surgical wounds are contaminated by bacteria, but only a small fraction of these become infected. VATS is likely associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection compared with thoracotomy or median sternotomy.7 The risk of developing a postoperative infection varies greatly with the nature of the operation and the characteristics of the patient undergoing the procedure. The optimal timing for the preoperative dose of antibiotics is within 30 to 60 minutes of the start of the surgical incision.8,9 In human surgery, repeat intraoperative antimicrobial dosing is recommended to ensure adequate serum and tissue concentrations of the antibiotic if the duration of the procedure exceeds two half-lives of the drug or if there is excessive blood loss during the procedure.8 In veterinary surgery, several different protocols have been suggested with most surgeons using preoperative cefazolin at 22 mg/kg intravenously and then every 90 minutes for the remainder of the procedure.10,11 The prophylactic antibiotic need not be administered beyond 24 hours postoperatively unless a major break in sterile technique or a change in contamination classification indicates that a therapeutic course of antimicrobials should be prescribed.


Exposure and Working Space


The initial requirement for any VATS procedure is an active pneumothorax. However, in some cases, increasing the amount of working space beyond that created by the initial pneumothorax may be necessary or beneficial for safe completion of a VATS procedure. Numerous factors play a role in limiting the actual amount of operable space during VATS, including patient size and morphology, positioning, instrumentation, and attributes of the patient’s underlying disease (e.g., adhesions, effusion, tumor size). Various techniques have been used to circumvent these limitations, including patient tilting or repositioning, organ retraction, intermittent ventilation, pleural space CO2 insufflation, and one-lung ventilation (OLV).


Pneumothorax causes retraction of the pulmonary parenchyma away from the thoracic wall, which generates the initial exposure and working space necessary to evaluate the pleural space. Pneumothorax also limits pulmonary expansion and therefore gas exchange at the blood–gas interface of the alveoli. Consequently, hypoventilation and hypoxemia will result if the patient is not adequately supported. Gas exchange is further impaired by positioning of the patient, use of pleural insufflation with CO2, and use of one-lung ventilation techniques.12,13-16 However, the addition of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation may minimize some of these untoward effects.13


images One of the simplest and safest methods for increasing working space in the thoracic cavity is by specific positioning or tilting of the patient. Trendelenburg principles also apply to the thoracic cavity during VATS. Using a mechanical tilt table, patients can easily be positioned into lateral-oblique, Trendelenburg, or reverse Trendelenburg recumbency during the procedure. Slight lateral tilting (∼20 degrees) of the patient while in dorsal recumbency is often helpful in shifting the heart and lungs to provide increased exposure in the thoracic cavity. However, the primary author of this chapter has seen acute desaturation because of bronchial obstruction of the ventilated lung in a dog that was tilted while undergoing OLV with a double-lumen endobronchial tube in place.17 This complication can also occur if an endobronchial blocker is used and becomes dislodged during patient positioning. It is therefore recommended that endobronchial blockers be placed after the patient has been positioned for surgery. Blockers that become dislodged or malpositioned during the procedure can be quickly addressed if a bronchoscope is available in the operating room to aid in rapid repositioning under direct visualization. Complete airway obstruction can be detected early by visualization of acute atelectasis and by a decremental or zero reading on capnometry. Working space in the thoracic cavity can also be improved through tissue retraction using instruments such as a fan retractor, blunt probe, or atraumatic tissue grasper. The pulmonary parenchyma is especially susceptible to iatrogenic damage (Figure 31.1), which can result in postoperative pneumothorax.5 Thus, extreme caution should be exercised during manipulation of the lung (Video Clip 31-1).

images

Figure 31.1 Intraoperative image of a thermally injured lung lobe during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Notice the discolored injured cuff of lung parenchyma. Saline was applied to this tissue during a breath hold to ensure that no evidence of rupture was present.


Several other options exist to help reduce the pleural space volume occupied by the lungs including intermittent ventilation, intrathoracic CO2 insufflation, and OLV. Intermittent ventilation is a safe method commonly used for many types of VATS procedures, but this method is labor intensive and is generally not practical for prolonged procedures.18 Unfortunately, studies have shown that intrathoracic CO2 insufflation is not well tolerated in clinically normal dogs even at low intrathoracic pressures because of significant cardiorespiratory compromise.19 It is for these reasons that OLV has generally been favored to increase working space within the thoracic cavity. OLV in veterinary surgery is becoming more common and has been used for a number of VATS procedures.12,20-23 There are three main methods for achieving OLV: selective bronchial intubation,24 endobronchial blockade,12,20,24 and double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLT).18,22 Selective intubation is a simple method of achieving OLV and is accomplished by placing the cuff of a long endotracheal tube into the mainstem bronchus of the selected lung. Endobronchial blockade requires tracheobronchoscopy to guide and position an inflatable balloon in the bronchus of the lung to be excluded. The lung is then blocked by inflating the balloon within the bronchus. Potential complications associated with this technique include overinflation of the balloon, resulting in obstruction of the contralateral bronchus at the carina,22 and entrapment of the guidewire within the surgical stapler.25,26 DLTs facilitates gas flow directly to a selected bronchus isolated from the contralateral lung by a dedicated lumen and an inflatable bronchial cuff. The contralateral lung is ventilated via a Murphey eye style opening and an independent lumen, which is positioned craniad to the endobronchial portion of the tube.16,18,27 The angled endobronchial tip can be positioned in either the left or right mainstem bronchus. After it has been positioned correctly, both cuffs (tracheal and bronchial) are inflated, and gas inflow is directed into either or both of the individual lumens as indicated by the particular VATS procedure.18 A dedicated anesthesiologist should be present to monitor and support the patient during OLV procedures, and time of OLV should be limited to the time required to complete the surgical dissection.16,21 OLV techniques have the ability to dramatically improve intrathoracic working space but can be associated with significant complications if not performed and monitored properly. It is therefore strongly advised that the minimally invasive surgeon and anesthesiologist work together to perform these procedures to improve patient safety and clinical outcome. For a more detailed discussion of anesthetic techniques for VATS procedures see chapter 29.


Complications


Port Placement


Appropriate port placement is critical to the success of a VATS procedure. In some instances, an exploratory thoracoscopy may be necessary before a definitive procedure such as lung lobectomy, or a targeted procedure such as lung lobectomy may be planned based on preoperative imaging. Regarding the former, ports should initially be placed to allow for triangulated evaluation of the major cardiopulmonary structures. After the target organ has been ­identified, additional ports can be placed as needed to perform the definitive treatment. If the definitive organ and procedure are known in advance, then the patient’s position and ports should be placed to best create triangulation around the region of interest. Inappropriate patient and port positioning may result in the inability to complete the VATS procedure and will increase the risk of complications.


images

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 27, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Thoracoscopic Contraindications, Complications, and Conversion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access