Natalie Karla Fisk1, Lisa Harrison1, Rosina Lillywhite2, Marie Rippingale3, and Nicola Rose4 1 Rossdales Equine Hospital & Diagnostic Centre, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK 2 VetPartners Nursing School, Greenforde Business Park, Petersfield, UK 3 Bottle Green Training Ltd, Derby, UK 4 Ash Vale, Guildford, Surrey, UK The process involved in admitting the surgical patient will depend on individual practice policy. This policy will dictate who admits these patients and whether this is a registered veterinary nurse (RVN) or a veterinary surgeon (vet), the role is an important one. The admission period is a vital time to gather patient information, which can be used to enable the practice to deliver the best care possible to each individual patient. As part of this process, a preoperative check takes place to ensure that the horse is in a condition suitable for GA; this may include a physical examination and blood tests [3]. Before the horse is admitted to the hospital, the person responsible for the admission needs to consider: Upon arrival, the client should be greeted in a friendly, welcoming way to ensure they feel comfortable. When admitting any patient, it is essential that the client does not feel rushed or unwelcome; this is especially relevant for surgical admission, as clients may be apprehensive about the procedure. The RVN must acknowledge why the client has come to the hospital, as the client will want to know that their horse will be cared for by the best team of people. When admitting horses, it is generally good practice to place the horse in a selected stable and then take the client to a quiet area away from the horse. This will reduce the chances of the client being distracted by the horse and will help them focus on the admission process. The admission process should include the following: Questions should include the following: After the client leaves, a complete clinical examination should occur; this may be done by an RVN or vet, depending on practice policy. All clinical parameters should be assessed (see Chapter 17). Emphasis should be put on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The musculoskeletal system should also be assessed to check for pre‐existing lameness. If the initial assessment highlights any areas of concern, these should be investigated prior to anaesthesia. This may require further diagnostic tests to be performed, such as electrocardiography (ECG), radiography, ultrasonography, haematology and biochemistry. The decision to perform further diagnostic tests will be at the discretion of the case vet. Blood samples may be taken for haematology to check for any underlying diseases and ensure the horse is fit for a GA. Typically, equine patients being admitted for surgery are admitted the day before surgery; this allows the horse time to settle and adjust to the surroundings; some horses will have travelled long distances or maybe unsettled travellers. Admission, the day before surgery, also ensures that the practice has time to carry out the necessary preoperative checks. However, this may not be the case for several reasons: Each surgery will require specific perioperative care; as an RVN, it is important to understand the requirements for the different procedures performed in practice [4]. Minor surgery generally includes minimally invasive surgeries with a low risk to the patient’s health and welfare. This may be performed under standing sedation or GA [13]. Common minor surgeries may include: Standing surgery is a procedure that is performed under local anaesthesia and standing sedation. Procedures using this technique can be classified as minor, but some are also major surgeries [13]. Common standing surgeries include: A GA is carried out for any surgeries that require the horse to be fully unconscious for the procedure; for more information on GA, refer to Chapter 10. Horses carry a high mortality rate compared to humans and small animals; because of this, a GA must be used only when necessary to carry out a procedure [11]. Common surgeries completed under GA include [12]: When preparing for any surgical procedures, it is important that the RVN is organised and understands the procedure that is due to happen; the following should be considered for all surgeries: Once all these points have been discussed as a team and a surgical plan has been created, the horse can be prepared for surgery. This will include the following: The starvation of surgical patients is a much‐debated topic, with some guidance set at starving for 6–12 hours prior to surgery. After the patient has metabolised the anaesthetic drugs, food is slowly introduced post‐anaesthetic. Traditionally, starving equine patients before GA has been suggested to reduce diaphragmatic splinting and vena cava compression by an otherwise full gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [11]. This reduction during recumbency (particularly dorsal recumbency) is hoped to preserve pulmonary functional residual capacity (FRC), alveolar ventilation and venous return during GA [11]. However, there is a lack of evidence to support the starvation of equine patients prior to GA. Evidence suggests that starving horses increases circulating catecholamines (catecholamines are important in stress responses [15], and high levels can cause high blood pressure or hypertension). Another reason for not starving prior to GA is that it may increase the chance of post‐operative ileus and/or caecal impactions. This has led to some hospitals now not having a starvation period. Specific, evidence‐based guidelines for the starvation of equine patients prior to GA are not available at the time of writing. However, the following guidance can be considered when deciding on a starvation protocol [11]: If access to food is to be restricted, the patient should be put in a stable containing nonedible bedding such as shavings or cardboard. Whichever starvation protocol is used within the practice, there are some instances where starvation is generally avoided regardless [12]: Table 12.1 identifies some possible advantages and disadvantages of starvation versus non‐starvation of equine patients before a GA. As previously stated, there are arguments for either, which should be decided upon using the best evidence‐based practice and statistics available [12]. Some surgeries require starvation to facilitate access to the surgical site, for example, a cystotomy. Under GA, the patient may need to be put into the Trendelenburg position (this is a term used to describe when the horse’s head is lower than the body) to access the bladder. Other surgeries will require extended periods of starvation to enable a procedure to take place. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopy may be required to have a starvation period of between 24 and 48 hours [12]. This reduces the ingesta in the colon and cecum, allowing the surgeon access to the upper caudal abdomen. Table 12.1 Advantages and disadvantages of starvation versus non‐starvation before surgery. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. It is vital to remember that horses do not require water removal before a GA. Shoes should be removed before GA to reduce the risk of injury to the patient and to protect the floor of the knockdown box from damage. The feet must then be pared and thoroughly scrubbed clean and, after induction, covered with rectal sleeves prior to hoisting into the theatre to prevent contamination [3]. If shoe removal is not possible, the shoes can be taped up with adhesive tape before induction. Scrupulous preparation is essential for surgery involving the foot or a structure close to the foot [3]. Bacterial numbers can be significantly reduced by removing the superficial hoof surface, for example, paring the feet with a hoof knife, applying a povidone‐iodine scrub and using a 24‐hour povidone‐iodine soak. However, bacterial populations can persist after these disinfection techniques [4]. Chlorhexidine gluconate could be considered for pre‐surgical foot preparation, as chlorhexidine has a residual activity against bacteria and is not inactivated by organic material, unlike povidone‐iodine. This, along with paring the feet before surgery, could be a useful and effective cleaning technique, although there is currently no empirical evidence to support this. Regardless of the cleaning technique, a foot dressing should be applied after cleaning, then covered with an empty drip bag, and secured with an adhesive bandage to keep the area clean and dry [3]. The horse should be groomed thoroughly to prevent contamination of the theatre. Some horses, especially those with long coats and feathers, may require bathing to facilitate asepsis [3]. The mane should be plaited if long, and the tail should be tied up and covered with a bandage or rectal sleeve. The surgical site must be identified with the vet before surgery and documented in the relevant places according to practice policy. Best practice may include having standard operating procedures (SOPs) for routine procedures. Diagrams and explanations of the clipping and prepping process could be provided to ensure this is standardised throughout the hospital to minimise human error. When using clippers for surgical skin preparation and intravenous (IV) catheter placement, the recommended blade size is 40. Previously, it was thought that 50 blades were suitable as they clipped the hair closer to the skin. However, these blades can clip too closely to the skin, sometimes resulting in post‐operative skin abrasions and acute dermatitis. When clipping the patient, the blades must be flat to the skin and used gently. Clipping too vigorously can damage the skin, causing abrasions that increase the risk of bacterial colonisation from bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus; this type of bacteria is commonly found in normal skin and only causes an issue if the skin becomes damaged [12]. Clipper blades must be cleaned between patients to prevent cross‐contamination. Diseases such as dermatophytosis (ringworm) and lice are easily passed from patient to patient by inadequate cleaning and disinfection of clipper blades. The clipper blade cleaner used must be fungicidal, virucidal and bactericidal, and act as lubrication for the clipper blades. If the blades are not adequately lubricated, they can cause excess tissue drag and damage the patient’s skin. Blades must be changed frequently, as blunt blades can cause skin trauma. Clipper blades should be sent off regularly for routine sharpening [1]. The surgical site should be clipped as much as possible before GA to minimise anaesthetic time. Equine patients are not ideal candidates for GA due to their large size. Clipping the day before surgery is considered controversial; some research suggests that the skin trauma caused by clipping causes residual skin bacteria to come to the surface and increases the risk of a surgical site infection (SSI). The hair protects the patient’s skin surface, often shielding it from dirt [18]. Removing the hair the day before surgery and leaving the skin open to a contaminated, stable environment may lead to an increased risk of an SSI. However, it has also been suggested that clipping the night before and the minimal risk this poses to SSIs is outweighed by the benefits of reducing anaesthetic time. When the patient is clipped, will depend on individual practice policies, which should be linked to the best available evidence‐based research [19]. When clipping for a surgical procedure, there should be a circumference of at least 5–10 cm around the patient’s surgical site where possible. In some instances, such as young Thoroughbreds that are going to the horse sales, a smaller clip patch or none at all may be required to ensure that it is less visible when the horse is sold; this may be requested by the owners/trainers; this is a decision to be made by the vet. Vascular access should be secured before any equine patient is anaesthetised [2]. This ensures that the anaesthetist has consistent IV access throughout the procedure, and this increases the safety of the patient and all theatre personnel. A wide‐bore catheter is usually placed around the time of premedication. Please see Chapter 17 for further information on IV catheter placement. The catheter should be placed into the left jugular vein if the horse is positioned in dorsal recumbency or the uppermost vein if the horse is positioned in lateral recumbency [3]. The application of a tail bandage aids in reducing microorganisms and contaminants entering the surgical theatre space; it also helps to ensure the tail does not contaminate the surgical site when moving the horse out of the theatre at the end of surgery and when recovering. Tail bandages come in a range of types. They can be a reusable, clean tail bandage, crepe bandage or self‐adhesive bandage; whichever is chosen, it should be appropriately placed so that it does not interfere with the blood supply to the tail [2]. Rinsing the horse’s mouth is vital to prevent the patient from aspirating food material during endotracheal tube placement [3]. A large dental syringe can be used for this, and the water should be warm. Mints or a small amount of mint oil can be added to the water to flavour it and make it more palatable to the patient. This will make the experience more positive for the patient. A leather padded headcollar should be applied to equine patients prior to induction. Leather is less likely to cause trauma, such as friction burns, when compared to nylon‐webbing material [2]. The padding on the headcollar protects the superficial nerves near bony prominences from the metal rings on the headcollar. This helps to reduce the chance of the patient developing facial paralysis following anaesthesia. However, removal of the headcollar following induction is the only way to prevent this entirely. Organisation and preparation of the operating theatre should take place the day before surgery where possible. It is important to be prepared and have all the necessary surgical instruments ready for the procedure. Sterilisation dates of all instruments and equipment to be used should be checked beforehand. Setting the room up before the patient and surgeon arrive helps to prepare prior to the procedure [4]. Preparations may include: The World Health Organization (WHO) has encouraged the use of SSCs to decrease errors and increase teamwork and communication in surgery [20]. Several human studies have shown a significant reduction in surgical‐related morbidity and mortality (between 43% and 62%) following the implementation of and adherence to SSCs. These SSCs are designed to minimise/erase human factors (human factors are those things that affect an individual’s performance). Research by Oxtoby et al. [21] suggests that 80% of adverse events are primarily related to human factors. Factors that the use of an SSC may eliminate include [22]: The benefits of an SSC may arise from the opportunity for the team to pause for a moment and communicate in a busy setting, which encourages the sharing of collective responsibility within the surgical team. An SSC should be a simple checklist of instructions that are carried out at three intervals throughout the surgical period and should include the following considerations [20]: Before the horse is induced: Before skin incision: Before the patient goes into recovery: A SSC should always be read aloud with the whole room pausing to listen and answer when appropriate; just using it as a tick list is not appropriate. If one person ticks these during the surgery, it will not prevent adverse events from happening. For more information on human factors or SSCs, please refer to VetLed and the WHO [22, 23]. Sedation prior to GA is covered in detail in Chapter 10. Commonly used sedative drugs include the following: A deeper level of sedation is usually required for standing surgery due to the horse being conscious. The surgeon may have to get themselves in dangerous positions to operate. Different sedation protocols are needed for different procedures, and the right sedation for the right procedure must be selected. A sedation plan should be made when discussing the procedure with the surgeon [15]. A combination of IV, intramuscular and constant‐rate infusions may be used. Xylazine is rarely used in standing surgery, as it is short‐acting, so it does not give a good enough level and depth of sedation even for short procedures [15]. For any procedures that are going on for some time or that use loud, noisy equipment, a CRI is typically a good method of administering sedation. It is created using a bag of saline spiked with a sedative (typically detomidine). It allows for a continuous delivery system of sedation to the patient to keep the patient on a level sedation plane without the patient transitioning between light and deep sedation, which can be a problem with ‘top‐up’ sedation. CRIs are administered IV and require the following preparation [15]: Local anaesthesia is essential for many surgeries; using anaesthesia locally in the area that is being operated on can reduce the amount of analgesia used, reduce the chance of wind‐up or a chronic pain state developing and ensure that the horse has a more comfortable post‐operative experience. It can also make a standing procedure safer for the surgeon as the horse cannot feel discomfort during the surgery. Types of local anaesthesia used include [15]: The most common local anaesthetics used are as follows [15]: Lidocaine with adrenaline is not for use in the skin as it has a vasoconstrictive effect and can cause tissue necrosis. Lidocaine with adrenaline increases the duration of anaesthesia; when used for local infiltration, its vasoconstrictive effect is an added benefit as it provides a bloodless operating field. Because of this, it is more commonly used in laparoscopic surgeries for desensitising internal structures and local infiltration during sinus surgery, throat surgery and perineal surgery [12]. When preparing local anaesthesia for a procedure, the correct type should be selected to prevent errors from developing. More information can be found in Chapter 10. Figure 12.1 Needle placement for an epidural in the horse. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. Epidural anaesthesia is most commonly used in standing procedures for rectovaginal fistula repairs in mares post‐foaling and any procedures in the perianal area. The caudal epidural space is most frequently used; it is found by lifting the tail, creating a divot that can be palpated. Xylazine is the preferred drug for perineal analgesia; its analgesic effect lasts longer than detomidine and romifidine and is thought to last around 2.5 hours [24]. Morphine can be used for an epidural but is more commonly used to manage severe pain or painful long‐term procedures. A long‐term epidural can be achieved by placing an epidural catheter into the caudal epidural space. If using an epidural in horses, it is important not to overdose as this can affect the sensory and motor function of the hindlimbs [12]. It is important for RVNs to know the landmarks for this procedure when assisting the vet, as they will be involved with patient preparation. Figure 12.1 shows the different areas where an epidural can be placed; the first position is between the sixth lumbar vertebrae L6 and the first sacral dorsal spinous process S1; this is used for catheter placement for continuous caudal epidural anaesthesia (technically demanding, infrequently performed). The second position is between the first and second coccygeal vertebrae (C1 and C2). Needle placement for caudal anaesthesia perpendicular direction. Once the needle is inserted, anaesthesia administration can occur, or a catheter can be introduced over 10–30 cm into the epidural space. After placement of the catheter, the needle can be removed and the catheter can be secured to the skin [24]. Surgical site preparation aims to remove debris and microorganisms from the dermal surface, reducing the risk of SSIs. The antimicrobial scrub used initiates this process aided by a validated scrubbing technique [25]. Complete sterilisation of the skin is impossible, and gradual recolonisation will occur. Whether using chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) or povidone iodine (PI), the most crucial factor is that the two skin preparations are not mixed. The two products are considered incompatible and deactivate each other. CG is cationic (positively charged) and PI is anionic (negatively charged). The manufacturers recommend not using them together for this reason [1]. Both CG and PI are suitable for surgical skin preparation. Many studies have been conducted to determine which skin preparation is superior. CG is often considered superior due to its prolonged residual action [26]. PI has a short residual activity compared with CG. There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that PI is less of an irritant to the skin in comparison to CG. Some research papers have reported a higher incidence of acute contact dermatitis in dogs with the use of PI. In human medicine, strong ratios of PI have been known to cause chemical‐type burns and contact dermatitis and strong solutions are also considered corrosive, so using the correct dilution rates is essential [26]. Alcohols such as ethyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol are also used as disinfectants and antiseptics. Water is necessary to increase the microbial efficacy of alcohol and formulations of 60‐90% are most effective [27]. The concentration of the product is more important that the type of alcohol used however, isopropyl alcohol has a greater bactericidal action than ethanol [27]. Alcohol can be used in combination with another antiseptic during skin preparation, for example CG. It can also be used to rinse off detergent left over from scrubbing with another skin antiseptic. Some studies have suggested that CG should be rinsed off with saline rather than alcohol [27]. Recolonisation of bacteria on the surface of the skin has been shown to be more aggressive post‐operatively when prepped with CG and rinsed with alcohol than if it had been prepped with CG and rinsed with saline. More research is needed into this area as the manufacturer recommends rinsing with alcohol. In contrast, some studies looking at the effect of commercially available preparations of 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol found that alcohol enhanced the residual activity of CG [27]. Clearly, there is a need for more research in this area before a standardised skin preparation protocol can be produced for veterinary practice. Until more information is available, practices should continue to use skin protocols that are in place, if they are effective, but pay particular attention to correct dilution rates and contact times for skin antiseptic solutions. CG should not be used in the skin preparation protocol for head and neck surgery, as it can cause ototoxicity (ear toxicity). This can induce hearing loss and balance problems. It is also very irritant to ocular surfaces and mucous membranes and can provoke ulcers, so PI is recommended for any surgery around these areas [12]. The scrubbing procedure may begin in the preparation room and be completed in the theatre, or the whole process may take place in the theatre. As there currently is no standardised skin preparation protocol for veterinary practice, the following steps should be treated as guidelines only [27]: Once the surgical site has been prepped, it should not be touched. The final surgical prep should be repeated if there’s a break in asepsis. The practice protocol for skin preparation should be followed in most cases. However, if an increase in SSIs is seen, a clinical audit should be carried out, and the skin preparation regime should be changed if considered appropriate. This should then be followed by another clinical audit to ensure that the changes have been effective. Gauze swabs should be folded into quarters by bringing the four corners together and holding by the corners. This produces a smaller contact area that is easier to control and limits the chance of fingers touching the patient. Move the gauze back and forth at the proposed incision site for approximately 15 seconds. It is the back‐and‐forth action that provides most of the cleaning. Discard the swab and select a new one. Gradually move out from the incision, keeping that back‐and‐forth action going, changing swabs regularly. Never return a dirty swab back to the incision site. A pattern of L and C shapes will keep the back‐and‐forth action going while enabling the swab to move away from the centre. This technique uses firm pressure as well as back‐and‐forth motion; evidence has shown that this method can penetrate the first five dermal layers [27]. Also known as the singular or concentrative pattern, historically, RVNs have used the circular scrub technique, which has often been favoured in the veterinary profession. Some evidence suggests the back‐and‐forth technique is superior to the circular scrub technique. This will vary on the particular area of the patient being prepared. The circular motion technique starts with a centre point (where the incision is to be made) and moves outwards away from the centre point in a circular motion to the clipped edge. Once the edge is reached, or the swab is contaminated, it must be discarded [27]. Excessive pressure is unnecessary and will abrade the skin, causing inflammation and the incision may be more prone to healing complications if the dermal layer is compromised. It will also cause the native skin microbes to rise to the surface. Figure 12.2 shows the two scrub patterns used in the equine patient when preparing for a surgical procedure [27]. Figure 12.2 Surgical scrub patterns: (a) The back‐and‐forth technique for the surgical preparation of the patient and (b) the circular technique for the surgical preparation of the patient. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. For ophthalmic surgery, a PI solution should always be used as CG has been shown to be more irritant to the surface of the cornea. Alcohol based solutions should not be used in this area [1]. PI should be used as follows [29]: Some surgeons do not advocate clipping around the eye for intraocular surgery and opt to use adhesive drapes instead to protect the eye from hair and skin [1]. Other surgeons prefer to clip a minimal amount of hair around the eye. A water soluble gel can be applied to the hair and into the eye prior to clipping. The skin surrounding the eye is thin and sensitive, so a well functioning set of clippers and clean blades should always be used. The eye should be irrigated with saline several times following clipping to wash away any hair and remaining lubricant. The eye can then be irrigated with a dilute a 0.1‐0.2% PI solution if required [1]. This section will concentrate on preparing wounds for surgical procedures. For information on preparing wounds that do not require surgery, please see Chapter 13. Hydrogels are helpful to place into the wound to prevent further dirt, hair and contaminants from tracking deep into the wound when clipping and prepping around the area as it creates a barrier and rehydrates the wound. A hydrogel protects the wound, keeps it moist and aids wound healing [12]. PI can be used for preparing contaminated, chronic and acute wounds as it has a broad antimicrobial spectrum, lack of resistance, efficacy against biofilms and is tolerated well [30]. If appropriate, a PI solution can be used on contaminated wounds; iodine scrub should only be used on intact skin. This can be difficult when preparing a large area of skin with wounds and intact skin. The PI scrub is used to lift the dirt and grease from the skin; without its use, the preparation of the area can take longer. When preparing two separate areas due to intact skin and multiple wounds, the wound should be covered with sterile saline‐soaked swabs, and then intact skin should be prepped with PI scrub [30]. This is then rinsed with sterile saline, and then the skin and wounds are prepared with a PI solution. PI has low cytotoxicity compared to CG, which has high cytotoxicity. The PI solution can be used to cleanse contaminated wounds before closure. A ratio for wound irrigation of PI solution (10%) should be applied in a 0.1–0.2% concentration. s. PI 7.5% scrub contains detergent and is unsuitable for cleansing wounds [31]. Saline is widely used for cleansing clean wounds and is often preferred due to its isotonic nature, which makes it non‐toxic to tissues. This characteristic helps maintain cellular integrity and prevents additional tissue damage during wound care. Unlike tap water, saline does not contain various compounds that might irritate the wound or disrupt the osmotic balance. In contrast, tap water can be beneficial for the initial cleaning phase of heavily contaminated wounds. Its abundance and cost‐effectiveness make it a practical choice for flushing out debris and contaminants. However, tap water should be used cautiously because it is not isotonic and may contain minerals and other substances. After the initial decontamination with tap water, switching to an isotonic solution like saline is advisable to promote optimal healing conditions and avoid potential tissue irritation. It’s important to note that tap water should only be used when a constant supply of potable drinking water is available, ensuring it is free from harmful microorganisms. The primary advantage of tap water lies in its affordability and ready availability, making it a convenient option for the initial management of contaminated wounds [31]. Sometimes, it is necessary to mark the surgery site with staples preoperatively. If this needs to be done, the skin should be clipped, shampooed rinsed and an initial skin prep should be carried out before staple insertion. The staples are then included in the skin preparation for surgical site preparation. Care should be taken when scrubbing, as it is easy to loosen the staples [12]. Recolonisation of the surgical site will gradually occur after antiseptic preparation. The time this takes will depend on several factors, including, but not limited to, antiseptic preparation used, length of surgery time and type of drape. It is essential to know how these factors can affect the efficacy of the products used, as re‐colonisation will increase the chance of SSIs. The occurrence of an SSI can cause major post‐operative problems for a patient and can be caused by the patient, the surgical team, as well as the environment [30]. To minimise this risk, correct surgical attire must be worn when scrubbing a patient (see Chapter 11 for more information). RVNs should remain bare below the elbows, and hats and masks should be worn from the point of scrubbing to the end of closure to minimise airborne microorganisms from staff. SSIs have various causes staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria associated with SSIs and is derived from the patients own skin flora.[12]. If the patient’s skin is damaged from excessive scrubbing or clipping, this encourages bacteria to come to the surface, and increases the risk of a SSI developing. Plastic drapes are more likely to increase the risk of SSIs; however, iodophor‐impregnated incise films are thought to reduce the risk, having shown fewer colonies of bacteria developing in the studies conducted [30]. Hair shafts and sweat glands go deep within the dermis; the longer a surgical site is left covered by a drape, the more likely the patient is to sweat and cause bacteria to resurface from the hair shaft or sweat gland. It is almost impossible to penetrate deep within the hair follicles. Prepping the surgical site just before the incision is made helps to prevent SSIs. If alcohol is used as a rinsing agent, it must be allowed to dry before the surgical incision is made. If diathermy or a laser is being used, alcohol should be avoided as it can cause burns [25]. A wound is a disruption of the anatomical and cellular continuity of tissue. Wounds can be created accidentally or intentionally [1]. An example of an intentional wound is a surgical incision. Wound healing is broken down into four stages: haemostasis, inflammatory, proliferation and maturation; these stages occur in an overlapping sequence of events that result in the repair of the damaged tissue. The healing process is initiated as soon as the injury occurs [12]. The basic physiology of wound healing remains the same for various tissue types: haemostasis, inflammation followed by proliferation and maturation. However, the length of time may differ considerably for the type of damaged tissue and the extent to which that tissue has been affected. Muscles and tendons generally take longer to heal due to the structural demands that are placed on them. These tissues require healing to a high level of strength and function. Muscle tissue should heal quickly, and immobilisation can help to allow strength to develop in the scar tissue [2]. The healing process for tendon and ligament injuries is slow, and rushing this process will only cause delays to the whole healing process. A tailored rehabilitation programme will often be needed for these types of injuries. Tissues in the GIT, urinary and reproductive tract heal more rapidly than the skin. The colon has the slowest healing time compared to the urinary bladder, which heals the fastest [2]. RVNs must understand the healing times of different tissues to ensure that rehabilitation plans and nursing care are tailored to the individual patient and are as effective as possible. Table 12.2 shows the average healing times for different tissue types; these times can be affected by external factors such as age, health status and SSIs [25]. RVNs should carefully monitor any wound, be it surgical or otherwise, for complications. Factors to look out for include [32]: The wound should be assessed carefully and treated accordingly if any of these factors are identified. Table 12.2 Tissue healing times. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. Wound types can be divided into open or closed wounds [12]. Closed wounds are injuries where the entire skin thickness has not been separated. A wound can be classified as follows: Understanding the type and classification of the wound being dealt with is essential, as this has implications for the equipment and methods required for treatment. The classification of the wound will impact the best management approach. There are different types of wound closure. These are as follows: Many factors could cause a delay in wound healing; some of these complications can derive from the patient itself, for example, self‐mutilation, systemic disease or other factors such as surgical complications, infection or poor wound management. The RVN plays a significant role in monitoring and assessing the progress of the wound during the healing process; it is essential to recognise complications as they arise to allow for a change in management as soon as possible, should it be required. Please see Chapter 13 for more information on the factors that delay healing [12]. Drains can be a helpful addition in wound management and healing in wounds where excess fluid accumulation is anticipated, predisposing the patient to seroma formation or where the infection is present, and drainage is beneficial. However, close monitoring and post‐operative care are essential in ensuring the selected drain works correctly and, therefore, does not adversely affect the wound healing process [12]. Equine patients occasionally present with large, traumatic, open wounds, which can create large areas of dead space. Dead space develops between tissues after the disruption of subcutaneous connective tissues. This is undesirable because the fluid that typically fills this void provides a prime medium for bacterial growth [4]. Drains are often used in these situations to prophylactically reduce the chances of excess fluid accumulation. A drain should be sutured proximally, traverse the wound and exit through a small incision separate from the wound [3]. Drains are classified by their action, which is either passive or active [5]. Passive drains use gravity and capillary action to allow fluid to drain freely from the wound. Active drains require ‘active’ suction to remove fluid or exudate. An active drain can be intermittently drained via a syringe or a chamber‐like device for continuous drainage. Table 12.3 shows the different drains available for use in equine patients, the mechanisms by which they work and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Figure 12.3 shows a Penrose drain on the left and a Jackson‐Pratt drain on the right. Figure 12.4 shows a Jackson–Pratt drain placed in a large wound surgically repaired under GA. As mentioned previously, drains require careful post‐operative monitoring and care. Things to monitor for are as follows [12]: Drains should be checked daily to ensure that they are still working correctly and are still patent. They should also be cleaned daily. During cleaning, the drain should be moved slightly to break any seal formed between the drain, the exudate and the surrounding skin [3]. Drains, although often placed to prevent problems, may occasionally cause further complications such as: If complications of drains are not identified and addressed promptly, the outcome of the wound healing and, therefore, the patient’s comfort and healing time can be significantly impacted. Timing of drain removal is essential, as premature removal of the drain will be counterproductive unless complications have been encountered. Drains should not be left in situ for an excessive length of time. Drains are usually left in place for 24–48 hours but longer if drainage persists [3]. Active drains allow for a more precise assessment of drainage reduction. In comparison, passive drains rely on a subjective visual assessment of drainage reduction and improved exudate appearance. When the drain is removed, the skin suture is cut and the drain is pulled out swiftly [2]. It is important to pull the drain out in the correct direction, for example, with gravity, to avoid pulling the most contaminated end of the drain back through the wound. Table 12.3 Types of surgical drain. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. Figure 12.3 Left Penrose drain, right Jackson–Pratt drain. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. Figure 12.4 Placement of a Jackson–Pratt drain. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. A skin graft is the term used when a portion of skin is detached and relocated from one site to another. The aim is to significantly reduce the skin deficit, which should hasten wound healing [3]. Grafting is useful for distal limb wounds in horses when healing is delayed due to reduced blood supply and poor wound contraction [3]. There are different classifications of skin grafts. These are as follows: Free Grafts: Pinch grafting is a commonly used technique in equine medicine due to its cost‐effectiveness and relative ease of execution. It involves the removal of small pieces of skin (usually with a punch tool) from a healthy donor site and transferring them to the recipient wound bed. These grafts are particularly useful for smaller wounds where a limited amount of skin is required for coverage. Punch grafting involves the use of a punch tool to extract circular sections of skin from the donor site. These grafts can vary in size depending on the diameter of the punch used. They are versatile and can be applied to wounds of different shapes and sizes, offering a tailored approach to equine wound management. Tunnel grafting involves creating tunnels beneath the recipient wound bed and inserting strips of donor skin into these tunnels. This technique is advantageous for wounds with irregular or undermined margins, as it allows for more extensive coverage and facilitates the establishment of a new blood supply. Full‐thickness sheet grafts involve transplanting entire layers of skin from the donor site to the recipient wound bed. These grafts provide comprehensive coverage and are suitable for larger wounds or those requiring structural support. They can be further classified as meshed or unmeshed depending on whether the graft is expanded to cover a larger area by creating perforations. Partial‐thickness sheet grafts involve transplanting only the epidermis and a portion of the dermis from the donor site to the recipient wound bed. These grafts promote faster healing and minimise donor site morbidity compared to full‐thickness grafts. Similar to full‐thickness grafts, they can be meshed or unmeshed depending on the specific requirements of the wound. Pedicle grafts remain connected to the donor site by a vascular pedicle, which supplies blood to the graft during the initial stages of healing. However, in equine medicine, the use of pedicle grafts is limited due to the inelastic nature of equine skin, which makes it challenging to mobilise sufficient tissue for grafting without compromising vascular integrity. Additionally, the risk of vascular compromise and graft failure is higher with pedicle grafts in horses compared to other species. Skins grafts should be dressed with a sterile, non‐adherent dressing and bandaged to immobilise the graft site. This may sometimes require a Robert Jones Bandage (RJB) or a cast. If nosocomial infections associated with streptococci or pseudomonas are present in the hospital, the bandage should be changed daily for at least five or six days [1]. If nosocomial infections are not a concern, the bandage should be left in place for four to five days to avoid unnecessary disruption to the delicate vascular attachments to the graft [1]. A bandage should be placed on the limb until the wound has completely epithelised. The patient should be carefully monitored for complications, and regular pain scoring should occur. Figure 12.5 shows the structure of an equine long bone; for more information on the structure and function of bone, see Chapter 4. However, this figure can be used as a reference point throughout this section. Bone structure can renew and remodel to repair its surface; this is called bone activation. Bone can regenerate itself rather than healing through the production of scar tissue like a tissue wound [1]. Once the bone structure has healed, it can resume 100% of its former strength again. The three main components of bone include: Figure 12.5 The structure of a long bone. Source: Rosina Lillywhite. Cortical bones are characterised by their compact structure and higher density levels, compared with cancellous bone, which is less dense and features a more porous composition[33]. Anatomical terms are often used to describe the location of a fracture:
12
Surgical Nursing and Patient Care
Glossary
12.1 Admitting the Surgical Patient
Before Admission
Admission
Post‐Admission
12.2 Preparing the Surgical Patient
Minor Surgery
Standing Surgery
GA
Starvation
Starvation 6–12 h
Advantages
Starvation 6–12 h
Disadvantages
No starvation
Advantages
No starvation
Disadvantages
Reduces gut fill and, therefore, pressure on the diaphragm during anaesthesia
It can affect the horse’s behaviour and increase stress levels which may mean that anaesthetic drugs are less effective
Horses are less stressed which means that the anaesthetic drugs are more likely to be effective
More intestinal gut fill and therefore more pressure on the diaphragm during anaesthesia
Reduces the weight of the abdomen on the lumbar musculature. Possibly reducing the chance of myopathy, especially in dorsal recumbency
Increase in stress hormones
Stress hormones are not as elevated
There may be a higher chance of myopathies and neuropathies due to the weight of the abdomen on lumbar musculature
It may decrease the chances of aspiration pneumonia due to reflux
Increased chances of hyperlipemia in some patients, e.g. donkeys
Reduced chances of hyperlipemia
There may be a higher chance of aspiration pneumonia
Reduced chance of rupturing the stomach on induction
It may cause equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS)
Reduces the chance of EGUS developing
Increased chance of stomach rupturing on induction if full
Reduces the risk of aspiration of food material when the endotracheal tube is placed as there is no food material in the oral cavity (this risk can also be reduced with mouth cleansing prior to induction)
There may be an increase in post‐operative ileus leading to pelvic flexure and caecal impactions
Increases the risk of aspiration of food material when the endotracheal tube is placed as there will food material in the oral cavity (this risk can also be reduced with mouth cleansing prior to induction)
There may be a reduction in post‐operative ileus reducing the chances of pelvic flexure and caecal impactions
Shoe Removal and Foot Preparation
Grooming
Site Identification
Clippers
IV Catheter Placement
Tail Bandaging
Mouth Cleansing
Padded Headcollar
Preparation of the Operating Theatre
Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC)
Sedation Considerations
Constant‐Rate Infusion (CRI)
Local Anaesthesia
Types of Local Anaesthetic
Epidural Anaesthesia
Surgical Site Skin Preparation
Scrubbing patterns
‘The Back‐and‐Forth Technique’
The Circular Scrub Technique (Target or Bullseye)
Skin Preparation for Ocular Surfaces
Skin Preparation for Wounds
Skin Marking
Bacterial Colonisation
12.3 Wounds
Physiology of Wound Healing
Healing Times of Different Tissues
Wound Healing Complications
Tissue type
Healing average healing time
Mucosa and skin
5–7 days
Subcutaneous and peritoneum
7–14 days
Fascia
14–28 days
Muscle
At least 60 days
Types of Wounds
Open Wounds
Closed Wounds
Classification of Wounds
Wound Closure Methods
Drains
Types of Drains
Management of Drains
Passive drains
Type of drain
Material
Action and function
Advantage
Disadvantage
Gauze drains
Fine mesh gauze
Gravity
Capillary action
Economical
Step‐by‐step removal
Adherence of fibrin clots to gauze
Risk of gauze fraying
Latex Penrose drain
Soft, pliable latex
Gravity
Capillary action
Mostly extraluminal drainage
Economical
Many applications
Kinks easily
Not applicable in body cavities
No suction possible, collapse
It may facilitate ascending infection
Silicone Penrose drain
Soft, pliable, nonreactive silicone
Capillary action
Mainly extraluminal drainage
Minimal tissue irritation
Use in latex‐sensitive patients
Radiodense marker
Not applicable in body cavities
No suction possible
Rubber tube drains
Red Rubber
Gravity
Capillary action
Because of relative stiffness, it is rarely compressed or occluded
Suction possible
Increased foreign body reaction
Sheet drain
(‘well [wave] drain’)
Waved sheet of stiff red rubber
Gravity
Capillary action
Because of relative stiffness, it is rarely compressed or occluded
Can be cut to size
Increased foreign body reaction
Flexi‐drain
12 parallel joined silicone tubes of 3‐mm diameter
Gravity
Capillary action
Good drainage along the tubes where they join
Suction possible
Can be cut to size
Mainly extraluminal drainage
Active drains
Type of drain
Material
Action and function
Advantage
Disadvantage
Redon drain
Round, multi‐fenestrated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with non‐fenestrated extension tube
Intraluminal drainage
Excellent for evacuation of fluids from body cavities
No collapse
Used for lavage and drainage
Stiff
Fenestrations may occlude
Jackson‐Pratt drain
Flat silastic, multi‐fenestrated drain with a non‐fenestrated extension
Intraluminal drainage
Excellent for evacuation of fluids from body cavities
Minimal tissue irritation
Expensive
The suction function is only possible when implanted in an airtight space
Blake drain
Round or flat pliable silastic drain with longitudinal slits and protected spaces with a non‐slit extension
Drainage through the longitudinal slits
Multifaceted slits reducing the risk of occlusion
Minimal tissue irritation
Radiodense marker
No collapse possible
Expensive
Voluminous
The suction function is only possible when implanted in an airtight space
Trocar catheter
Round, multi‐fenestrated tube
Inserted with blunt trocar into body cavity
Drainage of body cavity
Intraluminal drainage
Minimal tissue irritation
Used for fluid drainage and lavage
Relatively easy dislodgement and interruption of adequate drainage
Occlusion
Skin Grafts
Types of Skin Graft
Aftercare for Skin Grafts
12.4 Fracture Repair
Bone Structure and the Response to Injury
Anatomical Orientation of a Fracture
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree