Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections

CHAPTER 27 Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections



This chapter is designed to aid the veterinary clinician in collecting samples for bacterial culture, understanding the methods used to detect bacteria, interpreting results, and ensuring that optimal results are received from the microbiology laboratory.



DIRECT MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION


The direct microscopic examination of samples taken from sites of suspected bacterial infection is an essential component for detection and interpretation of microbial isolation and identification results. A variety of staining methodologies can be used to examine clinical specimens. The most common methods include the Gram stain and Wright’s (or Diff-Quik) stain. Less frequently used stains include acid-fast and silver stains.


Samples should be examined for the presence and type of inflammation. Wright’s or Giemsa stain is preferred for this evaluation because most cells are poorly recognized with Gram stain. The smear should be evaluated for inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and macrophages and the morphologic condition of the cells. Degenerate cells, characterized by swollen nuclei, loss of cytoplasmic detail, and nuclear destruction, are highly suggestive of a septic process and indicate that a culture should be performed on the sample. Wright’s stain will also detect bacteria, although the Gram-staining characteristics will not be apparent. The presence of both intracellular and extracellular bacteria is consistent with an infection rather than mere contamination. Bacteria are frequently observed when samples are obtained from normally colonized sites such as mucous membranes; however, they should not be accompanied by inflammation if only normal flora is present.


If fixed tissue sections are the only sample available for evaluation, several staining techniques can be used. With the standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain, bacteria will appear blue in color. Several silver-based staining methods are available to better visualize bacteria. These stains may be particularly helpful to observe leptospiral organisms in tissues. Available tissue Gram-staining techniques include the Brown and Brenn method, which can be used to identify the Gram reaction of organisms in fixed tissues.


Every sample submitted for bacterial culture should receive a Gram stain to facilitate detection of bacteria. This methodology is rapid, is simple to perform, and can give vital information regarding the potential pathogens present. Examination of the Gram-stained specimen can indicate the relative number of bacteria present. The Gram reaction, either gram positive or gram negative, and bacterial morphology can be used to develop a list of possible etiologies that can be used for empiric antimicrobial drug selection (Table 27-1). The observation of bacteria with specific morphologic and staining characteristics is consistent with the presence of anaerobic bacteria and indicates that the sample should also be incubated anaerobically (Fig. 27-1). For example, observation of large, gram-positive rods or long, tapered gram-negative rods suggests Clostridium spp. or Fusobacterium spp. infection, respectively. Failure to observe bacteria on a Gram stain does not rule out an infection because bacteria need to be present in fairly high numbers, 104 to 106/mL, to be detected.


Table 27-1 Gram Stain Reaction and Morphology of Common Bacterial Pathogens of Horses





























































PATHOGEN MORPHOLOGY
Gram-Positive Organisms
Streptococcus equi subsp. equi Cocci, often in long chains
Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus Cocci, often in short chains
Rhodococcus equi Pleomorphic coccobacilli
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Pleomorphic coccobacilli, diphtheroid
Dermatophilus congolensis Cocci, “railroad track”
Actinomyces spp. Rods, coccobacilli to filamentous and branching
Staphylococcus aureus Cocci
Clostridium difficile Rods
Gram-Negative Organisms
Escherichia coli Rod
Klebsiella spp. Rod
Actinobacillus spp. Rod
Pasteurella spp. Rod
Salmonella spp. Rod
Pseudomonas spp. Rod
Leptospira spp. Curved rods
Bacteroides spp. Rod
Fusobacterium necrophorum Rods, tapered ends


Some artifacts appear similar to bacteria in a Gram stain. As noted, the Gram stain is not particularly useful for identifying inflammatory cells because they usually stain gram negative with poor detail. Portions of cells, particularly the nucleus, can stain gram positive and may even look similar to dense clumps of gram-positive cocci in thick preparations. Therefore, it is best to look for bacteria in areas of the smear that are less dense. Equine respiratory secretions contain abundant mucus that stains gram negative. Occasionally, these strands can appear as long, gram-negative rods. They can be differentiated from true bacteria by their variation in size and length and irregular thickness.


Acid-fast (Ziehl-Neelsen) or modified acid-fast (Kinyoun) stains can be used to help identify members of the nocardioform-actinomycete group of bacteria, including Mycobacterium spp. (acid fast), Rhodococcus equi (weakly acid fast), and Nocardia spp. (weakly acid fast). Bacteria that are acid fast retain the stain carbolfuchsin and appear bright pink because of the waxy outer membrane containing mycolic acid (Fig. 27-2).



Direct detection of bacterial antigen in a sample can be accomplished using immunologic techniques such as direct immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. These techniques utilize antibody specific for the target organism and bind bacteria within the specimen. Bound antibody is subsequently visualized using fluorescent or light microscopy, respectively. Diseases for which these techniques are used include detection of Leptospira in urine and Clostridium in tissues such as liver or muscle. Fluorescent antibody testing can be a rapid means for diagnosis of specific infections, but it requires antibody specific for the organism and fresh or frozen specimens or tissues.



SAMPLING FOR BACTERIAL CULTURE




Samples Most Appropriate for Culture


Ideally, specimens from sites that are normally sterile, such as joint fluid, peritoneal fluid, and blood, are the best samples to collect for culture because any bacteria isolated are likely causative. Culture of clinical samples obtained from sites that are colonized with bacterial flora, such as nasal or oral mucous membranes, will usually yield normal bacterial flora of that region (Box 27-1). This may result in spending the client’s money and expending the laboratory’s efforts needlessly to identify many nonpathogenic bacteria. Because many of these bacteria can also be opportunistic pathogens, it is difficult to determine if they are causing the clinical condition. For example, collection of purulent discharge from the nasal passage of a horse will certainly yield bacteria that are potentially pathogenic, such as Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, but their detection does not mean this bacterium is the cause of the discharge. It is preferable to identify the specific site of infection, such as sinus, guttural pouch, or lung, and collect the sample for culture from that location.



Several exceptions to this rule can be made. In general, if the clinician is trying to detect a pathogen not present in colonized sites in clinically normal animals, the laboratory can specifically target identification efforts toward that organism or use selective media to enhance pathogen detection. Detection of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi from a nasal or pharyngeal swab would be appropriate because the microbiology laboratory can focus on β-hemolytic streptococcal isolates for definitive identification. Box 27-2 provides a list of specimens to be collected for bacterial culture of different body systems.




Methods for Collection


Tissue (collected as an aspirate or biopsy) and fluids are the best samples to collect for bacterial isolation. In general, larger samples increase the likelihood that a causative pathogen will be isolated because the sample can be centrifuged to concentrate any bacteria. Samples should be collected as aseptically as possible and placed in a sterile container. Submission of samples in a syringe is acceptable, but the needle should be removed and the syringe capped to avoid inadvertent injury and introduction of bacteria to personnel. Swabs are not the best choice for sampling because they hold only a small amount of material, and some swabs are made of substances that inhibit bacterial growth. Occasionally, however, a swab will be the only choice for sampling. Swabs are often not appropriate for fecal or intestinal cultures because of their inadequate sample volume. It is best to submit multiple samples in individual containers to eliminate the possibility of cross-contamination.



Suspected Anaerobic Infection


The clinician should decide before submission whether anaerobic culture is necessary so that the sample can be handled appropriately (see Chapters 44, 45, and 48). For example, when emphysema is detected within a tissue, such as in necrotizing myositis, anaerobic culture would be indicated. Likewise, anaerobic infections are common in abscesses, pneumonia, and pleuritis of horses. Anaerobic culture of tissues from an animal that has been dead for many hours may not be worthwhile because anaerobes will proliferate and disperse throughout the carcass. For example, observation of gram-positive rods typical of Clostridium spp. in muscle in a 24-hour-old carcass would not be indicative of clostridial myonecrosis.


Many anaerobes are highly sensitive to oxygen and will die during transport if not protected appropriately. Therefore, they should be stored and transported in an environment that minimizes their exposure to the atmosphere. Tissues or a generous volume of fluid (several milliliters) are the best samples for anaerobic culture. If a swab must be used for an anaerobic culture, it should be placed in a semisolid transport medium, such as anaerobic transport media or Port-a-Cul (BD Diagnostic Systems), to minimize air exposure. Tissues should be at least 1 × 1 cm. If very small tissue or fluid samples are available for sampling, they should be placed in transport media as well. Aerobic swabs are unacceptable for anaerobic culture and will not be set. Even anaerobic swabs poorly support anaerobic organisms and should only be used for short-term (a few hours) transport to the laboratory. Similarly, liquid should be placed on top of the transport media and pushed down into the gel to preserve the anaerobic environment.



Blood Culture


Neonatal foals are the equine patients at greatest risk for septicemia or bacteremia (see Chapter 6). However, blood culture may also be considered in older foals and adults when bacteremia or septicemia is suspected. Many systems are available for culturing blood, including conventional broth-based, biphasic broth-based, and lysis-concentration/filtration methodologies.


The conventional broth-based method

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 8, 2016 | Posted by in EQUINE MEDICINE | Comments Off on Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access