Bacterial Infections

section epub:type=”chapter” id=”c0040″ role=”doc-chapter”>



Bacterial Infections



Carolyn R. O’Brien


Abstract


Bacterial infections are typically caused by either inherently pathogenic bacteria or opportunistic commensal or environmental organisms that have been able to take advantage of inherent or acquired deficiencies in the immunologic defenses of the host. Fortunately, there are a relatively small number of bacterial organisms that act as primary feline pathogens. Some of these infections are geographically restricted whereas others appear to be ubiquitous in the global feline population. This chapter covers selected feline bacterial pathogens in detail and others are presented in summary.


Keywords


Mycobacteria; Streptococcus; streptococcal toxic shock syndrome; necrotizing fasciitis; cat scratch disease; Bartonella; bartonellosis; Nocardia; Rhodococcus; Actinomycetes.


INTRODUCTION


Bacterial infections are typically caused by either inherently pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Mycobacterium bovis, Yersinia pestis) or opportunistic commensal or environmental organisms that have been able to take advantage of inherent or acquired deficiencies in the immunologic defenses of the host. Fortunately, there are a relatively small number of bacterial organisms that act as primary feline pathogens. Some of these infections are geographically restricted whereas others appear to be ubiquitous in the global feline population. Several organisms that are significant causes of disease in dogs (e.g., Ehrlichia canis, Brucellosis canis, Borrelia species) either do not, or rarely, appear to cause overt disease in cats (although domestic cats may play a role as a maintenance host species for the latter two organisms). Likewise, the role of domestic cats in the epidemiology of rickettsial species, particularly Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia felis, and also that of Coxiella burnettii, the causative agent of Q-fever, are the subject of ongoing investigation. This chapter covers selected feline bacterial pathogens in detail, others are presented in summary in Table 40.1. Information on bacterial pathogens with significance to specific organ systems are covered in other chapters. Box 40.1 contains additional resources. More information on bacterial zoonotic diseases is found in Chapter 42: Feline Zoonotic Diseases and Prevention of Transmission.



Table 40.1





























































Key Aspects of Selected Feline Bacterial Infections in Cats.
Disease and References Agent Clinical Signs Diagnosis Treatment Comments
Plague (Black Death)134136


Gentamicin is the treatment of choice, particularly in the septicemic form. Doxycycline may be effective for treatment of bubonic form. Endemic to Asia, Africa, and North and South America. Transmission via flea bites (especially Xenopsylla cheopis) or by ingesting diseased rodents or lagomorphs. Ctenocephalides felis is thought to be a poor vector because continuous feeding behavior prevents the bacterium from establishing a biofilm in the gut.
Tularemia137140




Melioidosis141143
Variable spectrum of clinical syndromes: sepsis with hepatic and/or splenic abscessation, neurologic involvement, unilateral panophthalmitis.
Treatment is prolonged (12 to 20 weeks), often unsuccessful, and relapses may occur. Susceptible in vitro to trimethoprim-sulfonamides, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin-clavulanate or piperacillin-tazobactam, some third generation cephalosporins (but not cefovecin), tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, some fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. Affected animals should be closely monitored for relapse. Likely to be vastly under-reported especially in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia; sporadic human cases reported from the Caribbean, Central and South America, Africa, Indian subcontinent, and Middle East. Nosocomial transmission of infection is suspected. The organism has survived in a parenteral anesthetic solution and possibly an antiseptic cleaning agent containing cetrimide 3% and chlorhexidine 0.3%.
Pasteurellosis144 Pasteurella multocida. Gram-negative, nonmotile, non–spore-forming, facultative anaerobic bacillus. Subcutaneous abscesses, pyothorax (usually mixed with other anaerobic bacteria). Occasionally causes pneumonia, meningoencephalitis, and spinal empyema. Culture of exudate. Based on drug susceptibility testing, although it may not be readily available. Amoxicillin-clavulanate, fluroquinolones, cephalosporins, clindamycin. Commensal of the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract. Zoonotic risk associated with bite wounds or contact with saliva (e.g., open sores/wounds, especially in immunocompromised people).
Leptospirosis145,146
Mostly subclinical. May cause renal disease. Microagglutination antibody testing; can be difficult to identify causative serovar. Detection of organism via molecular methods, microscopy (ideally involving immuno-staining), or culture (many false negatives). Initially, IV ampicillin or amoxicillin, then oral doxycycline for 3 weeks. Supportive therapy for renal dysfunction as required.
Tetanus147




Q Fever148,149 Coxiella burnetii. Infection may be common but most cases are subclinical; may be associated with abortion. Not routinely performed; PCR and IHC may be useful. No treatment is necessary for subclinical infections; for clinical cases, oral doxycycline (10 mg/kg, every 24 hours, for 2 weeks) is recommended.

IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SC, subcutaneous.


STREPTOCOCCUS


Streptococci are gram-positive, facultative anaerobic cocci that are frequently cultured as part of the normal microflora of feline epithelial surfaces. The Lancefield classification system based on cell wall antigens (groups A through W) and hemolytic activity (nonhemolytic, alpha-hemolytic, beta-hemolytic) is commonly used to group species of streptococci. Most infections in cats are caused by species in groups C and G. The most commonly isolated species in cats is Streptococcus canis (beta-hemolytic, Lancefield group G).1 Occasionally, species more common in humans, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (Lancefield group A) and Streptococcus agalactiae (Lancefield group B) can be cultured from cats, and have been known to cause polyarthritis, bacteremia/septicemia, necrotizing fasciitis, peritonitis, and placentitis.24 These infections are considered to be a reverse zoonosis. Pets may play a role in maintaining a reservoir of infection for humans,5 but this is likely to be an uncommon event.6,7


Streptococcus suis (Lancefield group D), normally a pathogen of pigs, has also been isolated occasionally from normal cats and those with skin, central nervous system (CNS), and lower respiratory tract infections.8,9 These S. suis isolates are typically a range of serotypes (4, 9, 20, 22, 26), whereas the most common strain ­isolated from pigs—and affected people—is serotype 2. Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus (SEZ), typically associated with horses, is an emerging pathogen in cats.10,11


A summary of medically significant streptococcal infections is presented in Table 40.2.



Table 40.2









































Medically Significant Streptococcal Species in the Cat.
Streptococcus species Lancefield Cell Wall Antigen Group Hemolytic Activity Incidence and Diseases Reported in the Cat Comments
S. pneumoniae A Alpha-hemolytic. Rare. NF, septicemia, polyarthritis. Not normally part of the feline bacterial flora.
S. agalactiae B Alpha- or beta-hemolytic. Rare. Peritonitis, septicemia, placentitis, pododermatitis. Causative agent of bovine mastitis. Isolates from cats are genetically closer to isolates from people than from cattle.
S. equi. ssp. zooepidemicus C Beta-hemolytic. Uncommon. Sinonasal, meningoencephalitis. Predominately found in the caudal reproductive tract of mares. Can cause disease in people and dogs. Carrier state uncommon in cats, even those in close proximity to horses.
S. suis D Typically nonhemolytic. Rare. Sepsis. Normally a pathogen of pigs. Has been isolated from the tonsils, skin, and anogenital region of normal cats.
S. canis G Beta-hemolytic. Most common. Otitis media/interna, meningoencephalitis, STSS, NF. Normal commensal of the feline nasopharynx, gastrointestinal tract, anogenital region, and skin.

NF, Necrotizing fasciitis; STSS, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.


Reports of epizootic beta-hemolytic streptococcal feline infections date back to the 1920s,12 although it is unclear which streptococcal species were the causative agent(s) in these early studies. Numerous reports of the involvement of alpha-, beta- and non-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. in both cutaneous (e.g., pyoderma, furunculosis13) and internal infections (e.g., cholangiohepatitis,14,15 bacteremia,16 urinary tract infections, etc.) exist where the causative organism is not identified to the species level.


Streptococcus canis


Epidemiology and Pathogenesis


Streptococcus canis is a common skin commensal (particularly in the peri-anal region), upper respiratory tract (URT), oropharynx, rectum, and urogenital tract of clinically normal cats. It is also known to cause outbreaks of severe disease in group-housed cats.17,18 Prevalence is particularly high in the caudal reproductive tract of breeding colony queens <2 years of age, with rates of 70% to 100% reported.19 Outbreaks of disease in kittens may be seen when subclinical carriers are introduced into naïve breeding colonies.


The dichotomy of S. canis as both a harmless common commensal and the causative agent of devastating epizootics has prompted researchers to explore potential strain-related differences in virulence. Streptococcus canis lacks the phagocytosis-inhibiting capsular proteins of Lancefield A and C organisms and appears to be readily engulfed by neutrophils. Several Streptococcus species, including S. canis, can express M-protein on their surface. Variants of the M-protein can bind host mini-plasminogen, a cleavage product of serine protease plasmin. Active plasmin can thence be recruited, which enhances the ability of the bacterium to invade host tissues via the degradation of fibrinogen, and to survive in the blood by inhibition of complement opsonization. Streptococcus canis M-protein can also bind host-specific immunoglobulin G, which may interfere with antibody-mediated killing of the organism.20 A study has shown that isolates of S. canis associated with feline disease are mostly biotype 1 and express M-protein encoded by a particular allelic variant.21 Biotypes suspected to be less virulent were only isolated from healthy cats (e.g., biotype 2). Host factors such as suboptimal passive transfer of maternal antibodies, genetic predisposition, or stressful events such as concurrent infectious diseases, overcrowding, poor hygiene, and inadequate nutrition may all contribute to enhanced disease prevalence and morbidity.


Clinical Presentation


Streptococcus canis is a significant problem in kittens that acquire the infection from the genital tract of the queen during birth or via the oropharynx during grooming. The organism gains entry via the umbilical cord and then either directly infects the peritoneal cavity and/or enters the systemic circulation. Neonatal kittens may suffer overwhelming peritonitis and/or sepsis and this agent may be a cause of the so-called “fading kitten” syndrome or peracute deaths (Fig. 40.1). Swelling and exudate may be observed at the umbilicus (omphalophlebitis), and peripheral lymphadenopathy, joint effusion, or pneumonia may also be clinical features. The organism can cause pyometra in queens.22



Infected juvenile kittens (3 to 7 months of age) typically develop a uni- or bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, presumably secondary to pharyngeal colonization.


Older cats may also be sporadically affected, typically due to a breach in the host’s normal defense mechanisms (e.g., cutaneous wounds, immunosuppressive conditions, viral infections, etc.). Clinical conditions associated with S. canis in adult cats include chronic rhinosinusitis,23 otitis media and meningitis,24 discospondylitis,25 osteomyelitis, endocarditis,26 and myocarditis.27


Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome and Necrotizing Fasciitis


There are occasional reports of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS), necrotizing fasciitis (NF), and multiple organ dysfunction in cats caused by S. canis.2830 Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is a multisystem syndrome characterized by the sudden onset of shock and organ failure that was first recognized in humans in 1978. In humans, STSS is typically caused by group A streptococci (especially Streptococcus pyogenes) and about half of patients have concurrent NF.


Feline and canine cases of STSS and NF bear striking similarity to human cases although not enough cases have been studied to determine predisposing factors. In human medicine, scoring systems have been developed to help physicians distinguish early NF lesions from other less aggressive infections. However, no scoring systems have been developed for veterinary patients. Therefore, NF in cats is initially suspected based on the physical findings (e.g., local erythema, edema, severe pain, sometimes with signs of shock) and surgical findings (e.g., easy separation of fascia from other tissues, copious exudate that is thin and malodorous).31 Tissue for culture and histopathology should be taken from the leading edge of the lesion.


Most cases of STSS/NF documented in the veterinary literature involve canine patients. Canine STSS cases caused by S. canis were first identified in Ontario, Canada, in 1995.3234 Diagnosis of STSS was established if the animal had evidence of hypotensive shock and involvement of at least one organ or system in association with isolation of S. canis from a normally sterile site. Many cases had both STSS and NF, which appeared to increase mortality as it does in humans. Necrotizing fasciitis lesions often involve limbs and are characterized by intense pain with localized swelling that requires extensive drainage and débridement. Also similar to human cases, onset of clinical signs is sudden, disease progression is rapid, and the mortality rate is high.


A toxic shock–like syndrome associated with septicemia caused by a group G Streptococcus species was reported in three related kittens that presented with depression, pyrexia, respiratory signs, and limb swelling (although findings were not compatible with NF).28 Two of the three kittens died. Sporadic case reports of NF in cats appear in the literature associated with various pathogens, including Prevotella bivia,35 Acinetobacter baumannii,36 and Fournier’s gangrene.37,38 A few reported cases involved S. canis, including one fatal case of NF and necrotizing myositis with pneumonia30 and another case that survived after extensive débridement and negative pressure wound management.29


In contrast to individual case reports, reports of invasive streptococcal disease resembling STSS/NF affecting large numbers of intensively housed shelter cats have been reported in the United States with mortality rates up to 30%.17 Two distinct presentations have been noted. In two shelter outbreaks, skin ulceration and chronic respiratory infection progressed to necrotizing rhinitis/sinusitis and suppurative meningitis. Skin ulceration was most often found on distal limbs, and two or more limbs could be affected. Necrosis and perforation of the nasal bone overlying the frontal sinus were seen with subsequent cellulitis and edema of subcutaneous (SC) tissues causing the nasal bridge area to swell. In another shelter, rapid progression from NF with skin ulceration (Fig. 40.2) to toxic shock–like syndrome, sepsis, and death occurred.



These shelter outbreaks share some common and alarming characteristics. Although upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) was endemic in both shelters, S. canis was typically the sole pathogen reported in these cases. Although the S. canis isolates were sensitive to multiple antibiotics in vitro, treatment of patients was not always successful. Also, extensive environmental cleaning was often unable to prevent persistence of the bacteria in the environment. In an older report of an outbreak in a closed specific pathogen-free colony, only depopulating the affected building stopped the outbreak.39


The factors that allow a typically commensal organism to cause invasive life-threatening disease are not well-understood. Little is known about S. canis virulence factors in severe disease. All affected cats in one study carried almost identical isolates based on molecular typing, suggesting a clonal origin and spread of a virulent strain.40 Other factors could include shelter management practices, stressors, and antibiotic therapy for other conditions. Control measures for shelter outbreaks are discussed later.


Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus


Epidemiology and Pathogenesis


Reports of acute, fatal necrohemorrhagic pneumonia and septicemia associated with SEZ in dogs first appeared in racing kennels in the United Kingdom and in research colonies in the early 1980s.41,42 Since 2010, SEZ has been an important emerging pathogen in cats in shelters and large-scale hoarding situations. A large outbreak of upper and lower respiratory tract disease involving SEZ was reported in an Israeli cat shelter.10 Similarly, 55% of 81 cats with URTD rescued from four hoarding situations in the United States were positive for the organism (along with other common feline URT pathogens) on oropharyngeal and conjunctival swabs submitted for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and the authors speculated that this might have contributed to the particularly severe nature of the rhinosinusitis observed in these cats.43 Isolated cases have occurred in Canada11 and the United States.44 None of the cats had known exposure to horses.


A surveillance study of the prevalence of Lancefield group C streptococci via oropharyngeal swabbing of healthy dogs, cats, and horses in New Zealand showed no tendency for cats to be colonized by this organism, regardless of contact with equines.45


Clinical Presentation


In cats, SEZ lacks the hemorrhagic component seen in dogs. Mild to severe rhinitis and sinusitis is a common feature (Fig. 40.3). Postmortem findings include severe acute diffuse bronchopneumonia; some cases also have pleuritis, peritonitis, or pyogranulomatous meningoencephalitis.10 Co-infection with other organisms (e.g., calicivirus, herpesvirus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma felis) is common.



In addition to severe upper and lower respiratory tract disease, SEZ has been isolated from two cats with acute, fatal meningitis, which was likely secondary to the rapid spread of contiguous rhinitis.11 Progression to the brain from otitis media/interna was also documented in one successfully treated indoor cat.44


As in canine outbreaks of disease due to SEZ, contributing factors in feline outbreaks are not well-understood. There is evidence that some canine outbreaks may be due to virulent SEZ strains, and molecular analysis of feline isolates has demonstrated that members of the ST173 clonal complex are involved as in dogs.46 Environmental and management factors, as well as coinfections, may also play a role in feline disease outbreaks as most cases are reported in intensively housed populations. Unfortunately, there is a lack of knowledge about the incubation period and ease of transmission outside of the shelter environment, as well as the frequency and manner of shedding after recovery for highly pathogenic S. canis and SEZ infections in dogs and cats.


Diagnosis of Streptococcal Infection


The diagnosis is made by the observation of chains of gram-positive cocci in samples or occasionally within circulating phagocytes on examination of blood smears.47 Confirmation can be achieved via culture and/or molecular techniques performed on exudates, lung wash fluid, oropharyngeal swabs, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, urine, and/or fresh tissue samples.


Treatment


Antimicrobials


Lancefield group G streptococci are typically sensitive to penicillins, erythromycin, and clindamycin. Systemic and/or CNS infections require high-dose antibiotic therapy (e.g., intravenous penicillin or ampicillin sodium, trimethoprim–sulfonamide, a cephalosporin, or clindamycin) along with intensive supportive therapy. Drug doses are listed in Table 40.3.



Table 40.3





























Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Feline Streptococcal Infections.
Drug Dosagea Side Effects and Comments
Amoxicillin and clavulanate. 11 to 22 mg/kg, PO, every 12 hours. Vomiting and diarrhea (may be reduced by administration with food), inappetence, cutaneous drug reactions.
Cephalexin 22 to 30 mg/kg, PO, every 12   hours. Vomiting and diarrhea (may be reduced by administration with food).
Clindamycin 5 to 11 mg/kg, PO, every 12 hours. Vomiting and diarrhea, esophageal irritation. Administer immediately before food or a water bolus.
Penicillin G (potassium) 40,000 U/kg, IV, every 6 to 8 hours. Intravenous administration preferable for sepsis.
Trimethoprim/sulfonamide 15 mg/kg, PO, every 12 hours.  

IV, Intravenous; PO; per os (by mouth).


aDuration of treatment is dictated by the clinical presentation; a minimum of 2 weeks is suggested.


Control in Breeding Catteries


Breeding catteries with an endemic problem associated with neonatal and juvenile S. canis infections should implement preventative measures of swabbing the navel and umbilical cord of newborn kittens with 2% tincture of iodine solution and treatment with amoxicillin at birth.


Prevention of neonatal infection in endemic environments has been described by treating the queen with 1.0 mL/cat SC injection of a combined benzathine/procaine penicillin (300,000 International Units/mL) at the time of delivery.48 Newborn kittens are treated with the same product (diluted 1 : 6 with sterile 0.9% saline, 0.25 mL/kitten, SC). It is important to note that this protocol will not eliminate the carrier state, but it may reduce the bacterial population enough to protect neonates. Affected juveniles and adults can be treated with penicillin or its derivatives at relatively high doses (as the organism can be harbored in the tonsils).


Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome and Necrotizing Fasciitis


Successful treatment of NF and/or STSS in veterinary patients parallels recommendations for humans. Saving the patient’s life depends on prompt initiation of aggressive therapy that must be based on a presumptive diagnosis before test results are available. Treatment includes complete surgical débridement of necrotic tissue (often requiring multiple procedures or limb amputation), hemodynamic support, nutritional support, and analgesia. Antibiotic therapy is based on culture results, but broad-spectrum treatment is begun in the interim. Recommended drug regimens based on experience with human cases include a combination of penicillin, an aminoglycoside, and clindamycin.31 Fluoroquinolones are not recommended despite in vitro bacterial susceptibility. In fact, the use of enrofloxacin in dogs with S. canis infections is suspected to have contributed to the emergence of canine STSS/NF because fluoroquinolones may induce bacteriophages encoding superantigen genes and enhance virulence.49 Wound management techniques such as active closed-suction drainage50 and negative pressure wound therapy29,51 have been associated with success in veterinary patients.


Controlling Shelter Outbreaks


Control of SEZ and S. canis shelter outbreaks involves isolation of infected cats as the bacteria are shed in respiratory secretions.52 Clinically affected and exposed but apparently healthy individuals should be treated with an appropriate antibiotic as early as possible; duration of treatment is suggested to be 2 weeks.53 If humane care and adequate housing cannot be provided (e.g., for feral cats), euthanasia is recommended. Recovered cats should be quarantined for 2 weeks following complete resolution of clinical signs. Steps should be taken to prevent fomite transmission; environmental cleaning and disinfection are very important. Streptococcal species are inactivated by commonly used quaternary ammonium compounds and oxidizing agents. They are also susceptible to phenol-based compounds, but they are toxic for cats. Although antibiotic choices for treatment of S. canis are predictable, little has been published about antimicrobial susceptabilities for SEZ in cats. In general, group C isolates are expected to be susceptible to penicillin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol (with complete blood count monitoring), and cephalosporins.


Public Health Aspects


Sporadic reports of pet owners infected with S. canis and SEZ appear in the literature, but cases are typically associated with dogs54,55 and horses56 (and in one instance, a guinea pig57). Regardless, it would be prudent for veterinarians to take precautions against inadvertent infection of skin breaks or cuts when treating animals with STSS/NF by wearing medical gloves and protective clothing.


BARTONELLA


Epidemiology and Pathogenesis


Bartonella are small gram-negative proteobacteria with worldwide distribution that have a tropism for erythrocytes and endothelial cells of mammalian hosts. These organisms are transmitted via a variety of insect vectors, and several Bartonella species are known to infect people and animals. Perhaps the best known of these is Bartonella henselae, the causative agent of cat scratch disease (CSD) in people. Quite a few of the Bartonella species are known zoonoses. Cats are the primary reservoir for B. henselae (and may be co-infected with genotypes I and II);58,59 Ctenocephalides felis is the main vector.60 Bartonella henselae is also known to infect dogs, horses, and several wild animal species. Other species associated with human disease that have been isolated from cats include Bartonella clarridgeiae,61 Bartonella koehlerae62 and Bartonella rochalimae;63 however, the epidemiologic significance is unknown. Likewise, cats may be infected with Bartonella quintana,64 Bartonella vinsonii subspecies berkhoffi65 (the species most commonly isolated from dogs), and Bartonella bovis, but do not appear to be reservoir hosts for these species.63


Bartonella species are present in cat populations throughout the world, and prevalence appears to be highest where environmental conditions favor the multiplication of cat fleas. In the United States, B. henselae genotypes I and II, B. clarridgeiae, and B. koehlerae are found in cats in most of the country with the highest prevalence in the South.66 However, some parts of northern Europe have reported high seropositivity (e.g., 52% in the Netherlands67). Prevalence studies vary in methodology (e.g., serosurvey, blood culture, molecular methods) which makes comparison difficult, as does the intermittent nature of the bacteremia.


Transmission of Bartonella species requires a vector. Bartonella organisms within erythrocytes are ingested by arthropod vectors (primarily fleas, lice, sand flies, biting flies, and ticks) during feeding on blood. The organisms are then transmitted to a reservoir or accidental host when the arthropod attaches to its next victim. For example, contaminated flea feces on a cat’s skin end up under the cat’s claws during grooming. Transmission occurs when Bartonella-contaminated arthropod feces are inoculated into a skin wound when a host scratches another animal. A host animal may also infect itself by contaminating a wound while scratching at the site of an arthropod bite. Tick bites are suspected in the transmission of Bartonella to dogs and humans in the absence of other vectors. Notably, transmission of Bartonella via blood transfusion has been documented experimentally in cats.68 In one study of 180 shelter cats in the United States, Bartonella DNA was detected in oral swabs from 38% of cats.69 Bacteremic cats were almost three times more likely to have positive oral swabs than non-bacteremic cats. This raises the possibility that transmission may occur from exposure to saliva of infected cats.


Flea-bite transmission to humans or animals has not been confirmed. At least one case report where a veterinarian was infected through a needle-stick injury has been published.70 A study of veterinarians in Spain that found a high prevalence of infection with Bartonella species (73%) suggests that veterinary workers have a higher exposure risk than the general population.71


Young cats are more likely to be bacteremic than older cats.72 Kittens appear equally likely to be infected with B. henselae genotypes I and II, whereas young adult cats are commonly infected with genotype II.73 Cats can be subclinically infected with B. henselae and B. koehlerae for months, perhaps years.74 Infection of pregnant queens with B. henselae genotype II leads to transfer of maternal antibodies to some kittens, lasting up to 6 weeks of life. Although antibodies cannot prevent infection, they tend to be protective against high levels of bacteremia.75


Clinical Presentation


The significance of Bartonella as a pathogen of cats is unclear, despite numerous failed attempts to determine a cause and effect relationship between the organism and several feline diseases such as chronic gingivostomatitis,76 uveitis,76,77 degenerative joint disease,78 neurological disease,79 URT,80 and chronic kidney disease.76 There is also no association between fever and Bartonella antibody–positivity.81 Some studies have shown an association between Bartonella seropositivity and lower urinary tract disease, but the link between these two conditions, if any, is unclear.76,82,83 Feline diseases that have a more convincing link with Bartonella infection include endocarditis,84 myocarditis, diaphragmatic myositis,85 and possibly osteomyelitis.65 Bartonella may be responsible for some illnesses in immunocompromised cats, such as those with retrovirus infection. In one study of cats seropositive for Bartonella, feline immunodeficiency (FIV)-infected cats had an increased risk of lymphadenopathy86 compared to cats without FIV infection.


Most cats that are positive for B. henselae on blood culture or PCR are healthy carriers, reflecting a long-term host–parasite relationship.87 Some clinical signs have been associated with experimental infection, such as transient lethargy, fever, mild to moderate anemia, and neurologic dysfunction.61 In experimental infections, pyogranulomas have been observed in internal organs (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, heart, lymph nodes) at necropsy.61 It must be noted that many experimental studies have involved parenteral inoculation at much higher doses that would be encountered naturally, and despite this, most cats with experimental infection have no clinical signs or mild, self-limiting disease.


Diagnosis


Testing for Bartonella infection in cats is typically performed only for screening purposes; for example, to select suitable cats for blood donation, as part of preventative care for an immunocompromised owner, or if an owner is suspected of having bartonellosis. Serology for Bartonella antibodies has good specificity and can be useful to confirm a prior or current infection; however, sensitivity is poor.82 High antibody titers in cats often correlate with a positive blood culture or a positive PCR test.88 A negative antibody titer appears to correlate well with the absence of bacteremia in cats. However, there are some sick bacteremic cats that do not have detectable Bartonella antibodies for reasons that are not well-understood.89


Blood culture is considered the gold standard diagnostic test; however, waning of bacteremia can cause false negative results. Likewise, false negative results can occur with PCR testing. Due to the high prevalence of infection, especially in young cats, positive results on any test do not confirm that Bartonella is the cause of the cat’s clinical signs.


Given the challenges of interpreting test results, the definitive diagnosis of Bartonella infection as the cause of illness in sick cats remains difficult. A favorable response to therapy is considered important in establishing a diagnosis, especially in cats with clinical syndromes that have been associated with Bartonella infection and if a positive result has been recorded with serology, PCR, or culture. Table 40.4 presents options for treatment decisions based on the results of diagnostic testing. When healthy cats must be screened for Bartonella before blood donation or other reasons listed previously, testing should be performed using serology and culture and/or PCR.



Table 40.4





























































Treatment Decision Options Based on Results of Testing in Sick Cats with High Suspicion for Bartonellosis.
Diagnostic test result Infection Status Treatment Decision Options
Culture PCR Serology
+ + + Confirmed Treat
+ + Confirmed Treat
+ Confirmed Treat
+ + Confirmed Treat
+ + Confirmed Treat
+ Confirmed Treat
+ Bartonellosis not excluded; repeat culture and PCR if clinical suspicion is high. Do not treat now or treat empirically if disease progresses.
Bartonellosis not excluded; repeat serology in 2 to 3 weeks or perform culture and PCR in a few days if clinical suspicion is high. Do not treat now or treat empirically if disease progresses.

–, Negative; +, positive; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.


Adapted from: Álvarez-Fernández A, Breitschwerdt EB, Solano-Gallego L. Bartonella infections in cats and dogs including zoonotic aspects. Parasit Vectors. 2018 Dec 4;11(1):624.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 30, 2025 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Bacterial Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access