Antibiotic Resistance Profiles in Relation to Virulence Factors and Phylogenetic Groups of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Dogs and Cats



Fig. 9.1
Frequency of the antimicrobial resistances (%) in UPEC strains isolated from dogs and cats



A large number of isolates were resistant to cephalosporins, specifically to the third-generation drugs, while the lowest level of resistance was found to SXT.

E. coli strains isolated from dogs and cats showed similar antimicrobial profiles, and no statistically significant differences between two species were observed, except for cefovecin (p < 0.05).

Antibiotic-resistant isolates belonged to all phylogenetic groups (57% B2; 43% non-B2), while susceptible strains were associated almost exclusively in group B2 (90%) with a smaller percentage in group D (10%; Table 9.1).


Table 9.1
Distribution of virulence factors (VFs) and phylogenetic groups in relation to antibiotic-resistance profiles of E. coli strains (n = 40) examined
















































 
Gene

Susceptible strains (n = 10)

Resistant strains (n = 30)

VFs

papC

4 (40%)

11 (37%)

cnf1

6 (60%)

15 (50%)

sfa

6 (60%)

17 (57%)

fimA

9 (90%)

25 (83%)

iutA

2 (20%)

13 (43%)

hlyA

3 (30%)

 8 (27%)

cdt

0

 3 (10%)

afa

0

 1 (3%)

Score (median)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 17, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Antibiotic Resistance Profiles in Relation to Virulence Factors and Phylogenetic Groups of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Dogs and Cats

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access